--- Additional Comments From per at bothner dot com 2005-04-05 22:12
---
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/19475
Neil Booth wrote:
> I think it gets confused by the column numbers; if you add
> -fno-columns (or whatever it is) the problem would probably
> go away.
Or
--- Comment #7 from per at bothner dot com 2005-10-12 05:13 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] line number 0 for
causes GAS to complain
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-12 00:15
> ---
> Per,
> A
--- Comment #9 from per at bothner dot com 2005-10-12 07:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] line number 0 for
causes GAS to complain
ppluzhnikov at charter dot net wrote:
> May I repeat my question:
> What is the problem of emitting '#1 ' anyway?
It's
--- Comment #10 from per at bothner dot com 2005-10-12 07:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] line number 0 for
causes GAS to complain
What about this patch:
Index: c-ppoutput.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/c
--- Comment #11 from per at bothner dot com 2005-10-12 16:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] line number 0 for
causes GAS to complain
I agree that -dD output should be preceded by a '#1 ' or
a '#0 ', since otherwise the output is a bit confusing:
# 1 "&q
