[Bug testsuite/55756] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/same_type_as_1.f03 -O (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55756 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2012-12-21 14:29:40 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Dec 21 14:29:34 2012 New Revision: 194663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194663 Log: 2012-12-21 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2012-12-21 16:51:41 UTC --- Sorry, I didn't look down the PR - I thought that we were just at the stage of your opening email :-( Paul

[Bug fortran/54992] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] Wrong offset in the array offset calculation when using nonclass%class(index)%nonclass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55172] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid: gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55172 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55172] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid: gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55172 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-04 20:50:23 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Jan 4 20:50:15 2013 New Revision: 194916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194916 Log: 2013-01-04 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55172] [4.7 only] [OOP] gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference in SELECT TYPE

gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot ||gnu.org Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] |[4.7 only] [OOP] |ICE on invalid: |gfc_variable_attr(): Bad |gfc_variable_attr(): Bad|array

[Bug fortran/55618] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-06 18:48:07 UTC --- Created attachment 29089 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29089 modified version of one of the failing tests Confirmed This is a failure of the scalarizer

[Bug fortran/55618] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite

||2013-01-06 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-06 21:12:31 UTC --- Created attachment 29091

[Bug fortran/54992] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] Wrong offset in the array offset calculation when using nonclass%class(index)%nonclass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54990] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in tree_operand_check on SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54990 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/53876] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with class array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54992] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] Wrong offset in the array offset calculation when using nonclass%class(index)%nonclass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54992 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-07 19:10:40 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jan 7 19:10:32 2013 New Revision: 194994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194994 Log: 2013-01-07 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/53876] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with class array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-07 19:10:39 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jan 7 19:10:32 2013 New Revision: 194994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194994 Log: 2013-01-07 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/54990] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in tree_operand_check on SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54990 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-07 19:10:41 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jan 7 19:10:32 2013 New Revision: 194994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194994 Log: 2013-01-07 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55618] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-08 06:14:01 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jan 8 06:13:52 2013 New Revision: 195004 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195004 Log: 2013-01-08 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

||2013-01-08 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-08 21:43:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29113

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-09 09:44:07 UTC --- Please find below my interpretation of the validity or not of the testcase for this PR. > The following test is probably invalid, but not rejected by recent trunk > versions:

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-09 13:07:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) snip > Huh? the interface of `x%p' is `a', not `iabs'. > I think the comments are correct; the former is valid, the l

[Bug fortran/55072] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing internal_pack leads to wrong code with derived type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-09 13:16:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > (In reply to comment #16) > > > > Question is: Is the packing needed here? I would guess that it isn't. > > > > > >

[Bug fortran/55868] [4.8 Regression] gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-12 12:52:45 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jan 12 12:52:41 2013 New Revision: 195124 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195124 Log: 2013-01-08 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55868] [4.8 Regression] gfortran generates for CLASS(*) __m_MOD___vtab__$tar on NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55868 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55618] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-13 07:51:30 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 13 07:51:26 2013 New Revision: 195129 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195129 Log: 2013-01-13 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-13 08:57:51 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 13 08:57:46 2013 New Revision: 195133 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195133 Log: 2013-01-13 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55618] [4.6 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-14 17:59:13 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jan 14 17:59:07 2013 New Revision: 195159 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195159 Log: 2013-01-14 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55618] [4.6, 4.7, 4.8 Regression] Failures with ISO_Varying_String test suite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55618 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-15 05:29:07 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jan 15 05:29:01 2013 New Revision: 195185 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195185 Log: 2013-01-15 Paul Thomas PR fortr

[Bug fortran/54286] [4.8 Regression] Accepts invalid proc-pointer assignments involving proc-ptr function result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-21 19:30:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Created attachment 29221 [details] > > Fix for this PR and PR 47517 > > I confirm for this PR. However while the original code of PR 47517 executes

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:09:12 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 27 07:09:06 2013 New Revision: 195492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195492 Log: 2013-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortra

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:09:12 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 27 07:09:06 2013 New Revision: 195492 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195492 Log: 2013-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:18:29 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 27 07:18:22 2013 New Revision: 195493 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195493 Log: 2013-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-27 07:37:40 UTC --- Sorry, the apparent fix in comment#5 is just noise. The real fix is on its way today. Paul

[Bug fortran/54107] [4.8 Regression] Memory hog with abstract interface

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56138] Deferred-length character RESULT: ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc

||2013-01-30 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-30 06:10:59 UTC --- Created attachment 29305

[Bug fortran/56138] Deferred-length character RESULT: ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||51976 --- Comment #2 from Paul Th

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

||2013-01-30 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Ever Confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/56138] Deferred-length character RESULT: ICE in gfc_add_modify_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56138 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2013-01-31 07:59:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > REOPEN. > > As Dominique showed (thanks!), this bug is not fixed. It is only fixed if the > function is 'contained' in another one (e.g. main program

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Jan 27 21:24:01 2016 New Revision: 232904 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232904&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Paul Thomas PR fortran/69385 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/69422] Unexpected result with allocatable character type component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 69422, which changed state. Bug 69422 Summary: Unexpected result with allocatable character type component https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #18) > Author: pault > Date: Wed Jan 27 21:24:01 2016 > New Revision: 232904 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232904&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > 2016-01-27 Paul T

[Bug fortran/69524] [6 Regression] [F08] Compiler segfaults on "module procedure"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/69524] [6 Regression] [F08] Compiler segfaults on "module procedure"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7) > I could be wrong but I do not agree that this is valid code. I will turn to > it tomorrow. I believe that a MODULE SUBROUTINE/FUNCTION declaration cannot > appear in

[Bug fortran/69566] [6 Regression] ICE with unlimited polymorphic array pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69566 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c === *** gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 233009) --- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(working copy) *

[Bug fortran/69566] [6 Regression] ICE with unlimited polymorphic array pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69566 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jan 30 17:44:56 2016 New Revision: 233011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233011&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/69566 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/69566] Failure of SELECT TYPE with unlimited polymorphic function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69566 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 37530 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37530&action=edit Patch to be committed For whatever reason that I cannot uncover, the part of the original patch in trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 31 10:22:05 2016 New Revision: 233016 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233016&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-31 Paul Thomas PR fortran/67564 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/67564] Segfault on sourced allocattion statement with class(*) arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67564 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 37531 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37531&action=edit Fix for 5-branch 5-branch requires a slightly different fix. For some reason, the argument to copy is not being g

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Dear Anthony, In reply to your email message, this one is high on my list of PRs to fix. A workaround, which could be permanent, is: program tester character(LEN=:), allocatable :: S S= test(2)

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to vehre from comment #4) > Hi Paul, > > I will have a look at it today. May be a fresh pair of eyes can be of help. > > - Andre Thanks. I haven't given it much attention yet. I diverted into recur

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to vehre from comment #6) > What I have learnt so far: > > When the gimple optimisation algorithm 'remove_unused_locals ()' in > gcc/tree-ssa-live.c is done, it has removed the temporary for the > _g

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 37686 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37686&action=edit Provisional patch for the PR I have reworked the handling of deferred string function results to fix this PR. Cl

[Bug fortran/69834] New: Collision in derived type hashes

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- As reported by James van Buskirk on clf https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/0bm3E5xJpkM module types implicit none type CS5SS integer x real y

[Bug fortran/64324] Deferred character specific functions not permitted in generic operator interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64324 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3) > Fixed on trunk. I will wait a few weeks before fixing on 5-branch. > > Paul This has been on hold awaiting a fix for PR69423 on trunk. It looks as if the wait is ne

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 20 18:26:59 2016 New Revision: 233589 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233589&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-20 Paul Thomas PR fortran/69423 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/69834] Collision in derived type hashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/69834] Collision in derived type hashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 37791 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit Better Patch I couldn't persuade the last patch to work on submodule_6.f08. Evidently, submodules wind up with th

[Bug fortran/69834] Collision in derived type hashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) Hi Dominique, I do not know what is going on here. > > Created attachment 37791 [details] > > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&act

[Bug fortran/69834] Collision in derived type hashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69834 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > Created attachment 37791 [details] > > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37791&action=edit > > Better Patch > > Withe patch applied to

[Bug fortran/70031] New: Error in recursive module subroutine declaration if declared as "module recursive"

NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- As reported by on This works: module test Interface Recursive Module Subroutine sub1 (x)

[Bug fortran/70031] Error in recursive module subroutine declaration if declared as "module recursive"

||2016-03-01 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- I pressed save too soon! As reported by "Bulova" on https://groups.google.com/for

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/61147] Incorrect behavior using function that returns deferred length character pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61147 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/6

[Bug fortran/49630] [OOP] ICE on obsolescent deferred-length type bound character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/6

[Bug fortran/60593] ICE with deferred length variable in FORALL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/6

[Bug fortran/64324] Deferred character specific functions not permitted in generic operator interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64324 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/6

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 --- Comment #33 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/60795] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong length when allocating character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Mar 9 20:49:58 2016 New Revision: 234093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk. PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/49630] [OOP] ICE on obsolescent deferred-length type bound character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 49630, which changed state. Bug 49630 Summary: [OOP] ICE on obsolescent deferred-length type bound character function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 54070, which changed state. Bug 54070 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 54070, which changed state. Bug 54070 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/60593] ICE with deferred length variable in FORALL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60795] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong length when allocating character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61147] Incorrect behavior using function that returns deferred length character pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61147 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64324] Deferred character specific functions not permitted in generic operator interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64324 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70031] Error in recursive module subroutine declaration if declared as "module recursive"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70031 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Mar 12 13:59:10 2016 New Revision: 234161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70031 * decl.c (gfc_ma

[Bug fortran/69524] [6 Regression] [F08] Compiler segfaults on "module subroutine"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Mar 12 13:59:10 2016 New Revision: 234161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234161&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-03-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70031 * decl.c (gfc_ma

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 69423, which changed state. Bug 69423 Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/43207] [OOP] invalid (pointer) assignment to and from abstract non-polymorphic expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43207 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Comment #3 f

[Bug fortran/59093] Segfault in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

||g, pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- It is the same as PR34640, which was already assigned to me, PR57116 and is related to PR40737. Paul

[Bug fortran/55427] [OOP] ICE with class-array-pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55427 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71156] PURE interface/definition inconsistency: accepts invalid, rejects valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/71156] PURE interface/definition inconsistency: accepts invalid, rejects valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 38527 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38527&action=edit Draft patch for the PR This regtests OK on 7.0.0. I want to check if there is a more elegant way of fixing the p

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >