[Bug fortran/87277] [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 11 15:59:07 2018 New Revision: 264210 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264210&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87277 * expr.c (is_sub

[Bug fortran/87277] [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 11 17:18:13 2018 New Revision: 264213 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264213&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87277 * expr.c (is_sub

[Bug fortran/87277] [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87277 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87284] New: [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

oduct: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reported by Andrew Baldwin on clf:

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 12 18:33:13 2018 New Revision: 264249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264249&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87284 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 12 18:53:50 2018 New Revision: 264251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264251&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87284 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Sep 13 19:46:05 2018 New Revision: 264288 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264288&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87284 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/87284] [7/8/9 Regression] Allocation of class arrays with mold results in "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44701 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44701&action=edit A fix for the PR This regtests OK. It needs one or two further tweaks before submission, which will occur tomorr

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 17 07:18:17 2018 New Revision: 264358 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264358&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85954 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Sep 17 11:22:27 2018 New Revision: 264365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264365&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/64120 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk. It only took 4 years :-( What are you up to these days, FX? Paul

[Bug fortran/87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument

||2018-09-18 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa - I

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 17:54:20 2018 New Revision: 264404 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264404&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85954 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 17:58:20 2018 New Revision: 264405 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264405&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87336 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 19:35:53 2018 New Revision: 264409 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264409&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87239 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > Duplicate of/ related to pr77325 and pr84109. > > PR84109 is completely different. The array descriptor 'elem_

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 19 17:44:36 2018 New Revision: 264427 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264427&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84109 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #5) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > > After generating a lot of module files with -fsyntax-only > > so make succeeds, and then running "make check" on the

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7) > Well, I can confirm this. Output from valgrind shows as the first error: > > Running test: event_transforms_1| Process library 'event_transforms_1_lib': > initia

[Bug fortran/87270] "FINAL" subroutine is called when compiled with "gfortran -O1", but not "gfortran -O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87270 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #2) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > This seems to have been fixed by revision r264008 on trunk > > Seems the segfault is 'fixed' due to the fact that th

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Sep 21 17:26:23 2018 New Revision: 264485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264485&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-21 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87359 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Juergen, Thanks for doing the reduction of the problem and thanks to Dominique for testing the patch. Fixed. Paul

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77325] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Sep 21 17:33:29 2018 New Revision: 264486 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264486&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-21 Paul Thomas PR fortran/77325 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #20) > Paul, thanks for the fix, our code test suite is still running, most of the > problems are solved, the unit test suite is completely good now, but there > are cer

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #21) > In our functional test suite, the tests nlo_4, nlo_5, fks_res_1 and another > test are still failing, they lead to segmentation faults. This will be > really diff

[Bug fortran/77325] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77325 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87151] allocating array of character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87151 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85603] ICE with character array substring assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85603 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/85603] ICE with character array substring assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85603 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 22 10:21:25 2018 New Revision: 264502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85603 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44738 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44738&action=edit A fix for the PR I have no idea at all why I didn't manage to fix this previously. It is almost obvious. Paul

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #0) > With an effectively empty (i=m,n and m>n) array constructor : > > > $ cat z1.f90 > program p >integer i >print *, [(f(i), i=2,1)] > contains >func

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #2) > Another group of examples. > First case is working in a sufficient manner. > Concatenating two empty hulls (zero len and size, respectivly) > gives an empty hul

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 67883, which changed state. Bug 67883 Summary: ICE on empty array constructor of character function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #41 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #40) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #39) > > The culprit for the second problem is r264358, exposed only once the > > original problem is fixed, i.e. w

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #42 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44746 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44746&action=edit Patch for the PR Many thanks Juergen for the reduced test. This is now DEJA-GNUified (see below). The patch reg

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/70752] Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/64120] [F03] Wrong handling of allocatable character string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64120 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #0) > The following code shows allocatable character does not work as it should: > >call g(1) > contains > subroutine g(x) > integer :: x > c

[Bug c++/65667] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 29 17:17:09 2018 New Revision: 264715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264715&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-29 Paul Thomas PR fortran/65667 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/70149] [F08] Character pointer initialization causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70149 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 07:02:49 2018 New Revision: 264721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264721&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70149 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 12:22:07 2018 New Revision: 264724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264724&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70752 PR fortran/72709

[Bug fortran/70752] Incorrect LEN for ALLOCATABLE CHARACTER

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70752 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 12:22:07 2018 New Revision: 264724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264724&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70752 PR fortran/72709

[Bug fortran/87359] [9 regression] pointer being freed was not allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359 --- Comment #45 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 30 13:52:55 2018 New Revision: 264725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264725&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-30 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87359 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/41599] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with associate-name => exp: Use (sometimes) a restricted pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41599 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/44044] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with class-valued function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44044 Bug 44044 depends on bug 38936, which changed state. Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/38936] [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477 Bug 87477 depends on bug 38936, which changed state. Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 38936, which changed state. Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/65667] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Oct 1 14:27:17 2018 New Revision: 264759 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264759&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/65677 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/56789] Wrong code with contiguous dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8) > Paul, I'm adding you to the CC in the hope that the analysis > in comment#7 might help you towards a solution that is > glaringly obvious to you (but not to me :-)

[Bug fortran/56789] Wrong code with contiguous dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #11) > (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #10) > > Even if that were allowed, the standard explicitly disallows the > > argument association in the

[Bug fortran/84244] [7/8 Regression] ICE in recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr, at tree.c:4535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84244 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/84219] [8 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_target_interpret_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/56691] [OOP] Allocatable array: wrong offset when passing to CLASS dummy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56691 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 10 18:16:14 2018 New Revision: 257550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257550&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84141 PR fortran/8415

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 10 18:16:14 2018 New Revision: 257550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257550&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84141 PR fortran/8415

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #38 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 10 18:16:14 2018 New Revision: 257550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257550&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84141 PR fortran/8415

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84141] [8 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Bug 84141 depends on bug 84155, which changed state. Bug 84155 Summary: [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/56691] [OOP] Allocatable array: wrong offset when passing to CLASS dummy

||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk. Thanks for the report, Marco. Paul

[Bug fortran/84074] Incorrect indexing of array when actual argument is an array expression and dummy is polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84074 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 11 18:22:24 2018 New Revision: 257564 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257564&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84074 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/84074] Incorrect indexing of array when actual argument is an array expression and dummy is polymorphic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84074 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80945] Invalid code with allocatable character array in READ/WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] Failure in associate construct with concatenated character target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 17 11:07:32 2018 New Revision: 257781 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257781&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84115 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] Failure in associate construct with concatenated character target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk, thanks for the report. Paul

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] Failure in associate construct with concatenated character target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80945] Invalid code with allocatable character array in READ/WRITE statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 18 08:59:06 2018 New Revision: 257788 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257788&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80945 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/83344] Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 19 22:09:13 2018 New Revision: 257827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257827&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83344 PR fortran/8397

[Bug fortran/83975] [8 Regression] ICE in set_parm_default_def_partition, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1919

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83975 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 19 22:09:13 2018 New Revision: 257827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257827&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83344 PR fortran/83975

[Bug fortran/83148] [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83148] [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Feb 23 12:35:30 2018 New Revision: 257930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257930&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83148 * trans-const.c

[Bug fortran/83148] [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/32630] [meta-bug] ISO C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630 Bug 32630 depends on bug 83148, which changed state. Bug 83148 Summary: [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/83149] [8 Regression] ICE on SELECT CASE: crash_signal in toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Feb 23 16:22:28 2018 New Revision: 257934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257934&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83149 * trans-decl.c

[Bug fortran/83149] [8 Regression] ICE on SELECT CASE: crash_signal in toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Feb 23 17:55:13 2018 New Revision: 257938 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257938&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83149 * trans-types.c

[Bug fortran/83149] [6- and 7-branches] Missing test for sym->ns->proc_name: crash_signal in toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84538] [8 Regression] Array of derived type elements incorrectly accessed in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 25 12:41:26 2018 New Revision: 257970 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257970&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84523 * trans-intrinsi

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83344] Use of uninitialized memory with ASSOCIATE and strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83344 --- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Feb 28 17:36:20 2018 New Revision: 258076 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258076&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83901 * trans-stmt.c

[Bug fortran/83901] [8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2402

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83901 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Feb 28 17:36:20 2018 New Revision: 258076 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258076&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-02-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83901 * trans-stmt.c (

[Bug fortran/83901] [8 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2402

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83901 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84538] [8 Regression] Array of derived type elements incorrectly accessed in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Mar 1 08:56:31 2018 New Revision: 258097 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258097&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84538 * class.c (class

[Bug fortran/84219] [8 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_target_interpret_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Mar 1 11:06:18 2018 New Revision: 258098 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258098&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84219 * target-memory.

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > Bisected to pauls r254427, the fix for PR81447 and PR82783. > > Test adjustments suggest that we'll create even more malloc/free calls. Hi Richard, I am sorry

[Bug fortran/84219] [8 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_target_interpret_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84219 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Mar 2 08:51:06 2018 New Revision: 258128 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258128&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-03-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84219 * gfortran.dg/co

[Bug fortran/81827] Large compile time with derived-type rrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81827 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- > There are two ways to fix this: > (i) Generate incomplete vtables, with the pointers to copy and finalise set > to null, for module derived types. This has the disadvantage that class > objects, such as the

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >