[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

2019-04-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89843] CFI_section delivers incorrect result descriptor

2019-04-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89843 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 14 18:14:58 2019 New Revision: 270353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270353&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89843 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

2019-04-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 14 18:14:58 2019 New Revision: 270353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270353&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89843 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/89846] CFI_select_part creates incorrect descriptor

2019-04-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89846 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Apr 14 18:14:58 2019 New Revision: 270353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270353&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-14 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89843 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/89846] CFI_select_part creates incorrect descriptor

2019-04-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk - just in time. Thanks for the report Paul

[Bug fortran/89843] CFI_section delivers incorrect result descriptor

2019-04-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Fixed on trunk - just in time. Thanks for the report Paul

[Bug fortran/90022] Issue with CFI_is_contigous and CFI base address

2019-04-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90022 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

2019-04-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

2019-04-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46216 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46216&action=edit Patch for the remaining problems. I am registering this now as a measure of progress towards doing a proper job

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

2019-04-21 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Apr 22 06:50:33 2019 New Revision: 270489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270489&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-22 Paul Thomas PR fortran/57284 * resolve.c (fin

[Bug fortran/87127] External function not recognised from within an associate block

2019-04-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87127 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Apr 24 07:27:42 2019 New Revision: 270532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270532&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-24 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87127 * resolve.c (che

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

2019-05-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

2019-05-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

2019-05-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) > (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #5) > > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > > > Currently, I am leaning towards using an option with a mandatory

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Thomas, > if the type is character, interoperability also requires that the length > type parameter be omitted or be specified by an initialization > expression whose value is one. > > F2008, 15.3.2 has

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > Hi Paul, > > > I am sure that the array part is OK. Otherwise, why have a type code for > > strings? > > It > > 18.5 The source file ISO_Fortran_binding.h > 1

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

2019-05-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-05-06 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46299 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46299&action=edit Fix

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 10 07:59:42 2019 New Revision: 271057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

2019-05-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 10 07:59:42 2019 New Revision: 271057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

2019-05-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri May 10 07:59:42 2019 New Revision: 271057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271057&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-10 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:47:32 2019 New Revision: 271089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271089&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:47:32 2019 New Revision: 271089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271089&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:47:32 2019 New Revision: 271089 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271089&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * trans-decl.c (

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:49:52 2019 New Revision: 271090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271090&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * gfortran.dg/IS

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:49:52 2019 New Revision: 271090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271090&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * gfortran.dg/IS

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat May 11 07:49:52 2019 New Revision: 271090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271090&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-11 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90093 * gfortran.dg/IS

[Bug fortran/90093] Extended C interop: optional argument incorrectly identified as PRESENT

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90093 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90352] [9/10 Regression] ICE on BIND(C) subroutine with characters with len /= 1

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90352 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90355] Uninitialized read in gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_4.f90 test

2019-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90355 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

2019-05-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

2019-05-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > Created attachment 46375 [details] > Patch for the problem > > I very much doubt that this was revision r257065. The problem looks to have > Andre's signature on it.

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

2019-05-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 19 12:32:55 2019 New Revision: 271380 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271380&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90498 * trans-stmt.c (

[Bug fortran/90498] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

2019-05-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun May 19 18:08:28 2019 New Revision: 271383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271383&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-19 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90498 * trans-stmt.c (

[Bug fortran/90786] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

2019-06-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-06-08 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Confirmed Paul

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

2019-06-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

2019-06-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jun 8 15:52:38 2019 New Revision: 272084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272084&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90786 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > I agree with the analysis of the standard and will add the corrected > > testcase > > to the testsuite. > > Hi Paul, > > Can you please extend the analy

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 09:43:37 2019 New Revision: 272090 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272090&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas PR fortran/89365 * gfortran.dg/as

[Bug fortran/89365] Inquiry functions for assumed rank objects fail

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89365 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67894] bounds of assumed-rank dummy argument not equal to actual argument

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Please look at PR89365 - it seems that there has been an historic muddle in the wording if the relevant parts of the standard. I agree with Harald's last co

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 18:26:33 2019 New Revision: 272093 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272093&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 18:31:11 2019 New Revision: 272094 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272094&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 9 18:31:58 2019 New Revision: 272095 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272095&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-09 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/5

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90498] [8 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 10 05:48:44 2019 New Revision: 272103 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272103&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-10 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/90

[Bug fortran/90498] [8 Regression] ICE with select type/associate and derived type argument containing class(*)

2019-06-09 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90498 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

2019-06-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > See also https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-06/msg00034.html. I have responded to Christophe on the above thread to the effect that I cannot see anything t

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

2019-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46511&action=edit x86_64 Assembler for testcase Hi Thomas and Andrew, I am at a complete loss on this one. The attached x86_64 as

[Bug fortran/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

2019-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7) > I think we can move this to NEW. Please look at comment #10 to PR90786. I am at a complete loss on this one. What to do? Paul

[Bug fortran/91022] A suspicious code in fortran/decl.c

2019-06-27 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0) > Following code contains assignment after return: > > 3512 bool > 3513 gfc_insert_parameter_exprs

[Bug rtl-optimization/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

2019-07-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #21 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to pthaugen from comment #20) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #17) > > sched2 swaps the two insns (37 and 40 for me -- use -dp to see the numbers > > in your .s file, use -da if you wa

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 46562 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46562&action=edit Patch for the PR This fixes the original problem and regtests OK. I need to think this through and to test it ag

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to ygal klein from comment #4) > The following code presents a difference (!) between gfortran 8.2 and > gfortran 9.1: > > program test > implicit none > integer, parameter :: length = 2 > real

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jul 7 10:53:37 2019 New Revision: 273176 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273176&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-07-07 Paul Thomas PR fortran/91077 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jul 7 14:32:53 2019 New Revision: 273177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273177&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-07-07 Paul Thomas PR fortran/91077 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jul 7 14:50:53 2019 New Revision: 273178 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273178&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-07-07 Paul Thomas PR fortran/91077 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/91077] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong indexing when using a pointer

2019-07-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91077 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45305] Array-valued calles to elementals are not simplified

2018-07-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jul 2 19:28:11 2018 New Revision: 262316 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262316&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/45305 * expr.c : Add a

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

2018-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 09:46:31 2018 New Revision: 262331 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262331&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug fortran/82969] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:211

2018-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 09:46:31 2018 New Revision: 262331 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262331&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

2018-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 10:45:52 2018 New Revision: 262339 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262339&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug fortran/82969] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:211

2018-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 10:45:52 2018 New Revision: 262339 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262339&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

2018-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82969] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:211

2018-07-03 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66679] [OOP] ICE with class(*) and transfer

2018-07-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86408] [9 Regression] bogus error: ABSTRACT INTERFACE must not have an assumed character length result (F2003: C418)

2018-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
| Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail|9.0 | --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- A fix is regtesting as I write. Paul

[Bug fortran/86408] [9 Regression] bogus error: ABSTRACT INTERFACE must not have an assumed character length result (F2003: C418)

2018-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86408 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7) > A fix is regtesting as I write. > > Paul ...which is pretty much that of comment #2, except that it is applied to the result. Paul

[Bug fortran/86408] [9 Regression] bogus error: ABSTRACT INTERFACE must not have an assumed character length result (F2003: C418)

2018-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86408 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Jul 5 16:27:38 2018 New Revision: 262445 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262445&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86408 * resolve.c.c (

[Bug fortran/86408] [9 Regression] bogus error: ABSTRACT INTERFACE must not have an assumed character length result (F2003: C418)

2018-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86408 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

2018-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 44356 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44356&action=edit Fix for the new problem? Hi Rainer, Does the attachment fix the problem? Cheers Paul

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-07-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > Reducing the test case slightly more: > > > program ptr_alloc > >type :: t > class(*), allocatable :: val >end type > >type :: list > type(t), d

[Bug fortran/80477] [OOP] Polymorphic function result generates memory leak

2018-07-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86472] allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

2018-07-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86472] allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

2018-07-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > Yes indeed with respect to the declaration of 't'. However, since the > > submodule > > is a separate compilation unit, I believe that it also must contai

[Bug fortran/86472] allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

2018-08-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Having now checked the standard, I have come to the belief that your expectation that 't' will be associated in the procedure 'myfunc1' is incorrect. F2008 12.4.3.2 note 6 says: "An interface body specifies al

[Bug fortran/86906] erroneous name clash with renaming in use statement

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86906 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Aug 12 10:55:13 2018 New Revision: 263494 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263494&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86906 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/86906] erroneous name clash with renaming in use statement

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
||2018-08-12 CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- I will commit to 8-branch as well

[Bug fortran/86472] allocatable array, bound-procedure, submodule

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86472 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86906] erroneous name clash with renaming in use statement

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86906 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Aug 12 15:35:53 2018 New Revision: 263498 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263498&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86906 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/86906] erroneous name clash with renaming in use statement

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86906 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66679] [OOP] ICE with class(*) and transfer

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Aug 12 17:19:09 2018 New Revision: 263499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263499&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-12 Paul Thomas PR fortran/66679 * trans-intrinsi

[Bug fortran/66679] [OOP] ICE with class(*) and transfer

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/31237] [meta-bug] TRANSFER intrinsic

2018-08-12 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31237 Bug 31237 depends on bug 66679, which changed state. Bug 66679 Summary: [OOP] ICE with class(*) and transfer https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66679 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/86863] [OOP][F2008] type-bound module procedure name not recognized

2018-08-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86863 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Aug 23 06:27:54 2018 New Revision: 263799 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263799&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-23 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86863 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/86481] [OOP] Memory leak with sourced allocation

2018-08-26 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86481 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86481] [OOP] Memory leak with sourced allocation

2018-08-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86481 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Aug 28 11:35:52 2018 New Revision: 263916 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263916&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80477 * trans-expr.c (

[Bug fortran/80477] [OOP] Polymorphic function result generates memory leak

2018-08-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477 --- Comment #24 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Aug 28 11:35:52 2018 New Revision: 263916 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263916&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/80477 * trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/87127] New: External function not recognised from within an associate block

2018-08-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Posted on: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/Jc_3vZeATdU function exfunc(i) implicit none integer :: exfunc,i

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-08-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Aug 31 06:51:31 2018 New Revision: 264008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264008&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86328 PR fortran/8676

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

2018-08-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Aug 31 06:51:31 2018 New Revision: 264008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264008&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-08-31 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86328 PR fortran/86760

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

2018-08-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-08-31 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 1 08:11:34 2018 New Revision: 264027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264027&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86328 PR fortran/8676

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Sep 1 08:11:34 2018 New Revision: 264027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264027&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-01 Paul Thomas PR fortran/86328 PR fortran/86760

[Bug fortran/86760] [8/9 Regression] FORTRAN: polymorphic arrays inside a user-defined type generate segmentation faults

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86760 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86328] [8/9 Regression] Runtime segfault reading an allocatable class(*) object in allocate statements

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86328 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

2018-09-01 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87277] New: [8/9 regression] Segfault on using array component of class scalar pointer as an actual argument

2018-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pault at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Reported by Andrew Baldwin on clf. This segfaults in 8- and 9-branches. MODULE INTS_TYPE_MODULE

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >