--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 20:17 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 21:40 ---
Subject: Bug 20891
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 21:40:24 2006
New Revision: 117415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117415
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 21:40 ---
Subject: Bug 20779
Author: pault
Date: Tue Oct 3 21:40:24 2006
New Revision: 117415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117415
Log:
2006-10-03 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 21:41 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 21:41 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 22:37 ---
FX,
> When the len in "call sub(len)" is resolved, it is never given its correct
> return type, which leads to the ICE. I still don't understand why the implicit
> none is doing this
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-04 04:48 ---
Subject: Bug 29098
Author: pault
Date: Wed Oct 4 04:48:35 2006
New Revision: 117424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117424
Log:
2006-10-04 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-04 04:49 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
riables in
same call to ALLOCATE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pa
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-04 16:54 ---
Subject: Bug 29343
Author: pault
Date: Wed Oct 4 16:54:19 2006
New Revision: 117435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117435
Log:
2006-10-04 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-04 18:49 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for your patience!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 07:45 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> FX,
> > When the len in "call sub(len)" is resolved, it is never given its correct
> > return type, which leads to the ICE. I still don't understand why the
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-05 21:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=12388)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12388&action=view)
A fix for this PR
This checks for the presence of "GFORTRAN module" as the first utterances
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-06 12:32 ---
Oh dear, yes.
Thank you, Tobi.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-07 21:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=12395)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12395&action=view)
A provisional fix for this PR
This comes about because the gfc_evaluate_now is fixing the expression a
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-07 22:37 ---
This addition in resolve.c(resolve_fl_derived):5541
if (c->ts.type == BT_DERIVED && c->pointer
&& c->ts.derived->components == NULL)
{
gfc_error ("
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 29115
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 8 16:21:55 2006
New Revision: 117558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117558
Log:
2006-10-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #35 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 20541
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 8 16:21:55 2006
New Revision: 117558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117558
Log:
2006-10-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 29211
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 8 16:21:55 2006
New Revision: 117558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117558
Log:
2006-10-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #36 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:27 ---
Fixed in gcc-4.2
Paul and Erik
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:29 ---
Fixed for gcc-4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:29 ---
Fixed in gcc-4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 20:06 ---
Tobi,
This is a very unpleasant and venemous bug! Removing the
implicit character*32 (a-z)
results in
pr29373.f90: In function 'MAIN__':
pr29373.f90:8: fatal error: gfc_todo: Not Implemented: complex
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 22:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=12397)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12397&action=view)
Preliminary fix for this PR
This has only been tested against the reporter's example. Regtesting
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 09:50 ---
FX,
There are two problems here; one is specific to LEN and the other is generic to
intrinsics and array valued actual arguments:
The LEN specific problem is that there is no need to call the function at all,
in the
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12402)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12402&action=view)
Fix for this PR
Regtested on FC5/Athlon
Will submit asap.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=12403)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12403&action=view)
Fix for the problem
Regtested on FC5/Athlon
Will submit asap.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=12403)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12403&action=view) [edit]
> Fix for the problem
Sorry, I should have said that this gets r
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Paul,
>
> I'm not sure, but I think PR29394 is related to that one.
>
Yes, I already verified that yesterday but forgot to make a note of it. I'm
just gearing
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 19:36 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> One last comment: I'm not sure the stride shouldn't be set to one. The patch
> above regtests fine, and can compile correctly everything I threw at it, but
> maybe I h
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 20:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=12406)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12406&action=view)
A development of the previous patch (ie. it works!).
This now regtests, apart from alloc_comp_basic
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29428
ray constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 17:42 ---
Since I posted the patch, I had better take it unto myself!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 20:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=12412)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12412&action=view)
The correct fix for this PR
THis turns out to be completely specific to nullify, or to a pointer assign
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 12:18 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I try as soon as possible.
> Thanks for your help.
> This subroutine is one of an open-source project which contains about
> 1.000.000
> lines of fortran : http://www
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 12:31 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Paul, Jakub,
> Is the patch in comment #7 considered to be the right approach?
> I tried applying to my local tree, but a few chunks were rejected.
Jakub? What about it?
Paul
-
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|rejects-valid |
http
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 05:13 ---
Thanks, Dominique, for provoking the discussion and to veryone else for the
discussion and the resolution of the PR.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 09:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=12422)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12422&action=view)
This fixes the immediate problem of the lack of a character length.
I find that, except for c
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29364
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29373
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29407
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29232
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29422
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 27701
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29428
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 24398
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:17 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:18 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:18 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:19 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:19 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:20 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:20 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:21 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29428
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 11:13 ---
Please send a question of this type to comp.lang.fortran or, indeed, to the
gfortran list. We would be happy accept bug reports from you on Bugzilla but
not general numerical analysis questions.
Paul
--
pault at
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 13:10 ---
Subject: Bug 29371
Author: pault
Date: Sat Oct 14 13:09:56 2006
New Revision: 117732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117732
Log:
2006-10-14 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 13:19 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 13:24 ---
Fixed in trunk - I'll press the fixed button this time!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 13:27 ---
I have a regtestable fix for this. I just trying to extend it to include
non-default initialization of variables. If this does not work soon, I will
submit the patch as is.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 17:31 ---
Jerry,
See comment #10. The 'problem' is to take the gmp/mpfr representations of the
values in the constructor expression, write them out to form the source, read
then back in binary as the destination, c
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 19:58 ---
Jerry,
I was not entirely serious - if you want to take it on, great, but... it's a
pain in the beeehind!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 13:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=12444)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12444&action=view)
Full patch and testcase for this PR
The pigeon seems to have got lost on the way to submit this patch
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 14:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12445)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12445&action=view)
Simple fix, testcase and ChangeLog entries.
I'll submit this tonight.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=12446)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12446&action=view)
Fix for this and PR29394
As well as fixing these PRs, this patch provides an option -finitialize-null
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:29 ---
Subject: Bug 29392
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 16 22:29:46 2006
New Revision: 117797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117797
Log:
2006-10-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #37 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:29 ---
Subject: Bug 20541
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 16 22:29:46 2006
New Revision: 117797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117797
Log:
2006-10-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 04:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=12449)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12449&action=view)
Patch without initialization option
I have had to drop -finitialize-null due to problems in testing.
ED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29489
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 10:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=12450)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12450&action=view)
A patch to gfc_conv_intrinsic_bound to simplify diagnosis
FX,
The patch, as promised, is attached.
I ha
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:30 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:32 ---
In spite of the commit message going to the wrong PR, this was fixed on trunk.
I will put the numbers right in the ChangeLog tonight.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #38 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:33 ---
(In reply to comment #37)
Sorry all, I screwed up on the PR number - it should have been 29541
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 12:43 ---
I cannot persuade this to fault on any of the platforms to which I have access
either. 'tis an odd one.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29067
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 20:20 ---
Thank you, Richard - thanks to your splendid analysis, I was able to go
straight to the source of the problem:
trans-types.c(gfc_get_nodesc_array_type):1038 sets GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_LBOUND to
NULL_TREE if the arrayspec
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 04:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=12451)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12451&action=view)
Middle-end part of the patch
This attaches the appropriate code to trans-intrinsic.c to fix bot testcase
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 10:08 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thank you, Richard - thanks to your splendid analysis, I was able to go
> straight to the source of the problem:
> trans-types.c(gfc_get_nodesc_array_type):1038 sets GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 04:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29216
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 19 04:51:14 2006
New Revision: 117879
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117879
Log:
2006-10-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 04:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29314
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 19 04:51:14 2006
New Revision: 117879
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117879
Log:
2006-10-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 06:42 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 06:42 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-20 04:50 ---
Jerry,
I got your message and will reply later - I have to run for the bus!
I have been aware that there is a problem with empty symbols for some little
while. Whilst on the way to the lab, I will contemplate how
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-20 09:20 ---
The problem is specific to old-style initializers, as
program FOO
real :: x = 2.0 q
real z /2.0/ q
end program FOO
shows (comment out each declaration in turn!).
Grepping on the first error message leads us to
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-20 14:35 ---
Thank goodne for that - I thought that I was going batty!
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27954
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-27 18:23 ---
Subject: Bug 30407
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 27 18:23:14 2007
New Revision: 121235
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121235
Log:
2007-01-27 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-28 08:03 ---
Tobias,
> The error occurs when the symbol "hessian" is written.
> The error is gone if one removes the ": only ENERGY_CONSTRAINT" or the "use
> atoms" from the POTENTIAL_ENER
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-28 13:40 ---
It looks like it is mine.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
dBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30625
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 07:50 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Wasn't there a bug for byte-sized strides in array descriptors? This bug
> should depend on it, and PR29606 as well.
>
Both of you are right about PR29606. The byte-sized st
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 10:28 ---
Subject: Bug 30554
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 29 10:27:50 2007
New Revision: 121281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121281
Log:
2007-01-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 10:56 ---
FX,
It's funny that you should alight on this one - Last night, I forwarded a patch
to Jerry that cures the front-end problems but breaks in transfer.c. As well as
the testcase from PR30284, I sent him one th
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 17:30 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Paul's preliminary patch for pr30284 fixes this bug. The library side still
> shows a potential problem, but we don't hit it with the test cases here
> because
> w
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 09:26 ---
Dear All,
This is yet another derived type association problem in
trans-types.c(gfc_get_derived_type). If you insert a "use foo_type_mod" in
module foo_mod, the problem goes away. I believe the INTENT(OU
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 14:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=12987)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12987&action=view)
This fixes the PR
This is just now regtesting - I am pretty sure that it is OK. It will take a
day or
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 10:17 ---
The fix will be posted to the list, this weekend.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 10:19 ---
A fix is on its way, this weekend.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 12:36 ---
Subject: Bug 30626
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 2 12:35:57 2007
New Revision: 121500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121500
Log:
2007-02-02 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 12:36 ---
Subject: Bug 30284
Author: pault
Date: Fri Feb 2 12:35:57 2007
New Revision: 121500
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121500
Log:
2007-02-02 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
901 - 1000 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo
