--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-14 09:44 ---
To quote Lahey on this one:
Compiling program unit TT at line 1:
1267-S: "SOURCE.F90", line 6: If ASSIGNMENT is specified in the INTERFACE
statement, 'set' must have exactly 2 dummy argument
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 20:33 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
Thanks, Harald. I will follow this up on a ~few weekish timescale.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 22:34 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This bug has now migrated into the 4.1 tree. Sometime after the 20060104
> version Would it not be easier to elminate the offending updates rather than
> debug them ?
>
Yes,
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 05:47 ---
Dale,
I have calmed down a bit now! As I said, I put a lot into trying to get this
right; trunk is, of course, experimental and one should reasonably expect
problems of this kind to get ironed out on the fly. That
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug 20869
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:55:01 2006
New Revision: 109899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109899
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug 25024
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:55:01 2006
New Revision: 109899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109899
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug 25785
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:55:01 2006
New Revision: 109899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109899
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug 20875
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:55:01 2006
New Revision: 109899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109899
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 20869
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:56:43 2006
New Revision: 109900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109900
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 20875
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:56:43 2006
New Revision: 109900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109900
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25785
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:56:43 2006
New Revision: 109900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109900
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25024
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jan 18 18:56:43 2006
New Revision: 109900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109900
Log:
2006-01-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:57 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:58 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:59 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 18:59 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Thanks and sorry
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 16:56 ---
The patch for this got absorbed into the allocatable component patch - I will
extricate it and post it asap since it is only indirectly associated..
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 19:36 ---
This is a rather worrying regression:
Andrew, does this ring any bells?
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
get_frame_type (info=0x0) at ../../trunk/gcc/tree-nested.c:212
warning: Source file is
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 04:58 ---
Subject: Bug 28590
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 6 04:58:04 2006
New Revision: 115966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115966
Log:
2006-08-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 05:11 ---
Subject: Bug 28590
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 6 05:11:45 2006
New Revision: 115967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115967
Log:
2006-08-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 05:15 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 19:45 ---
A patch is on its way to the list, just as soon as it has finished regtesting.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 19:46 ---
A patch has alredy been posted.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-09 17:47 ---
uuuhhh! This is horrible and is a reflection of the symtree being ordered as a
binary tree. If 'r' is renamed 'zr', the order of translation is changed and
the code runs correctly; albeit stil
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-09 18:27 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It was caused by the openmp changes, but guess usually the parent routine
> at least touches the dummy argument and therefore it would be added to the
> right context.
> I
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 04:29 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> order the declarations or something.
>
> Paul
>
Having slept on it, I realise that this will not work because the statement
order should not matter. I think that there
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 04:56 ---
I can see what the problem is - when I wrote this section of code in expr.c, I
did the conditions for "step" and "finish" correctly but for "begin", I wrote:
/* Obtain
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-11 17:17 ---
> The attached runs the testcase below correctly and regtests, except for
> gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_5.f90, on Cygwin_NT/PIV.
I have tracked down the cause of this - it's just building t
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 12:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=12083)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12083&action=view)
Fix for the PR
Jakub,
The last part of this patch is required to stop the likes of the function
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-16 22:00 ---
Andrews,
The proposed fix is a good start but I am going to go at this one carefully -
the ICE goes away if the PRIVATE in dummybdy_com is removed; I want to find out
why this is first.
Paul
--
http
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 14:57 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
OK I understand it now. The PRIVATE declaration prevents references to 'a' and
'b' from being resolved, when USEing dummybdy_comm, because it suppresses the
symtree. Thi
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 15:03 ---
Sorry, meant to accept this on the last reply.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 10:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=12090)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12090&action=view)
Fix for the problem
This is regtesting right now - I have to go and cut a hedge... a huge hedge
(*sigh*)
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 18:28 ---
Andrew,
How, when and where does this happen, please?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28722
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 18:29 ---
As the submitter of the patch, I suppose that I had better take on the PR!
Thanks for the report, Martin
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 05:49 ---
> I know you're on vacation, Paul, but I think what looks troubling to us would
> look trivial to you, friendly as you are with the module code in gfortran!
>
I'll have a look today - I am in the m
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 12:32 ---
Yes, the problem is as I thought; rename the dummy and the external procedure,
say to str1, and the module compiles fine. It also compiles if the order of
the subroutines is changed. These are symptomatic of the
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 16:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=12098)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12098&action=view)
A fix for the PR and a testsuite entry
The problem turned out to be in parse.c(gfc_fixup_sibling_symbols)
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 17:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=12099)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12099&action=view)
Fix for the problem
This patch generates an error if an interface assignement attempts to modify an
in
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28601
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28496
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 20886
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28630
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28762
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28771
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 18111
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28735
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28660
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28425
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 28600
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 05:45:43 2006
New Revision: 116268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116268
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28630
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28735
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28601
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 20886
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28762
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28771
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28425
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 18111
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28496
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28660
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:29 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:29 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:45 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:48 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:50 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:08 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:08 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:09 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28496
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:10 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:11 ---
Fixed
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:13 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-21 13:35 ---
Jakub and co.,
Does the below do it for you? Instead of passing null, I propose to pass the
address of a longlong containing zero. This then leaves the normal passing of
NULL to possibly represent a missing
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 05:30 ---
> This problem was not present a few days ago, and it is quite elusive. Even
> adding or removing a few "!innocent" lines can change the error message,
> e.g. to something like
This is my doing, fo
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:02 ---
I have figured out what the problem is:
The module procedure formal arguments go into their own namespace; derived type
references pointing to the contained namespace. In the reformed association of
derived types
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 04:47 ---
Subject: Bug 28771
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 24 04:47:28 2006
New Revision: 116369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116369
Log:
2006-08-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 04:47 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 24 04:47:28 2006
New Revision: 116369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116369
Log:
2006-08-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 04:54 ---
Subject: Bug 28771
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 24 04:54:18 2006
New Revision: 116370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116370
Log:
2006-08-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 04:54 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 24 04:54:18 2006
New Revision: 116370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116370
Log:
2006-08-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 22:15 ---
The problem lies in resolve.c (resolve_generic_s):1623
On the face of it,
if (sym->ns->parent != NULL && !sym->attr.use_assoc)
seems to be wrong.
if (sym->ns->parent != NULL) fixes the probl
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 22:22 ---
The problem lies in resolve.c (resolve_generic_s):1623
yes, definitely. resolve_generic_f is not so prissy about use association
and has a somewhat different structure. If I were to transport this to
subroutines
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-08-28 22:15:42 |2006-08-28 22
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 04:51 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Tue Aug 29 04:51:32 2006
New Revision: 116552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116552
Log:
2006-08-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 04:57 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Tue Aug 29 04:57:29 2006
New Revision: 116553
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116553
Log:
2006-08-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 04:57 ---
Subject: Bug 28005
Author: pault
Date: Tue Aug 29 04:57:29 2006
New Revision: 116553
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116553
Log:
2006-08-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 15:49 ---
Since I just posted a patch for it, I might as well assign it to myself!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 15:50 ---
I believe that does it.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 16:29 ---
All the issues with dot product have been sorted, as far as I know.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 21:26 ---
Confirmed: changing the substring reference to the unambiguous
write (*,*) i, charr(i:i)
gets rid of the problem. Apparently, vene though charr is scalar, the
reference is being interpreted as an array
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 04:37 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1 again
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 04:46 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed: changing the substring reference to the unambiguous
> write (*,*) i, charr(i:i)
> gets rid of the problem. Apparently, vene though charr is scalar, the
>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:18 ---
Subject: Bug 28885
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25102
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:18 ---
Subject: Bug 28873
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 24866
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 20067
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25077
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 28873
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25077
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
701 - 800 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo
