--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:57 ---
Tobias,
Well done - that's a useful reduction.
I don't think that the deallocate is entirely wrong. However, the the rhs
expression should be assigned to a temporary first, the result deallocati
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 05:13 ---
5.4 Namelist
Constraint: If a namelist-group-name has the PUBLIC attribute, no item in the
namelist-group-object-list shall have the PRIVATE attribute or have private
components.
I think that, by extension
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 05:20 ---
Another sub-pr: putting the res on the rhs in parentheses does not work either.
This can be fixed by...
$ svn diff -x -cp gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 15:30 ---
This fixes the PR but is not regtested:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(révision 126835)
--- gcc/fortran/trans
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 09:20 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > This fixes the PR but is not regtested:
> Patch looks OK and regtests on x86-64.
That's strange - for me, it breaks ret_pointer_2.f90, at the statement print *,
x(3) becaus
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 19:27 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The problem looks similar to PR31205 in so far that gfortran did the
Tobias,
This PR is caused by the patch for pr31205. If you reference x1 in set, for
example by another print, it wo
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-26 20:02 ---
This is fixed by:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(revision 126885)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c(working copy
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 09:04 ---
Fixed as obvious.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 09:03 ---
Subject: Bug 32903
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 27 09:03:41 2007
New Revision: 126974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126974
Log:
2007-07-27 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-27 15:09 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Paul, any plans to get the fix from comment #3 into trunk?
>
Gee, Daniel - I had totally forgotten this one. Will do.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32682
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 05:29 ---
Subject: Bug 32880
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jul 28 05:29:06 2007
New Revision: 127011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127011
Log:
2007-07-28 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 05:30 ---
Fixed on trunk and IVS testsuite gives a clean sweep of greens - yipee!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 20:52 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Could somebody test the patch below, please?
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 11:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> This is OK to commit.
>
FX,
In developing the testcase, I found out that this version of the patch is wrong
- change 'f=0' to 'f=42&#
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 14:45 ---
Fixed on trunk with correction to be unity rather than zero based.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug 31211
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 29 14:44:03 2007
New Revision: 127044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127044
Log:
2007-07-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 14:44 ---
Subject: Bug 32682
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 29 14:44:03 2007
New Revision: 127044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127044
Log:
2007-07-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 14:47 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-30 16:22 ---
To my amazement, the patch below fixes the problem and, I am pretty sure, will
complete its regtest OK.
Before posting it, I want to thoroughly check that I have understood the
problem and that the fix is valid
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 22:28 ---
Fixed on trunk - this is clearly related to pr31214 so, hey ho, off to work
we go!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-31 22:14 ---
Subject: Bug 31609
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 31 22:14:29 2007
New Revision: 127108
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127108
Log:
2007-08-01 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 20:13 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Confirmed.
>
> Paul, I'm putting you on the CC list because you fixed
> PR 31994, the original conjg(transpose()) bug. Maybe
> you can do something about this one :-
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 20:46 ---
Subject: Bug 31214
Author: pault
Date: Sat Aug 4 20:46:11 2007
New Revision: 127213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127213
Log:
2007-08-04 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 20:58 ---
Subject: Bug 31214
Author: pault
Date: Sat Aug 4 20:58:11 2007
New Revision: 127214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127214
Log:
2007-08-04 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-04 22:13 ---
The problem occurs whenever the destination array is described by and array
descriptor; eg.
complex(kind=8) :: a(2,2), b(2,2)
call testcase (a, b)
contains
subroutine testcase (a, b)
complex(kind=8) :: a
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-08 16:34 ---
The patch below fixes this problem and all its variants. It regtests, except
for allocatable_function_1.f90. This runs OK but the number of free's goes up
from 10 to 11; hence the failure on exepecting 10 of
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 08:47 ---
Just for the record:
13.14.110 TRANSFER (SOURCE, MOLD [, SIZE])
...snip...
Result Value. If the physical representation of the result has the same length
as that of SOURCE, the physical representation of the result
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 06:16 ---
Subject: Bug 32962
Author: pault
Date: Mon Aug 13 06:16:03 2007
New Revision: 127391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127391
Log:
2007-08-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 06:18 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 17:15 ---
I am just about to submit the fix.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 20:58 ---
Subject: Bug 32827
Author: pault
Date: Mon Aug 13 20:58:00 2007
New Revision: 127397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127397
Log:
2007-08-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 21:02 ---
Subject: Bug 32926
Author: pault
Date: Mon Aug 13 21:02:00 2007
New Revision: 127398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127398
Log:
2007-08-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 21:03 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-13 21:04 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32827
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 16:36 ---
This fixes it but there are one or two regressions that I need to investigate.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-14 16:44 ---
This fixes the problem. However there are some odd regressions that do not
seem to have anything to do with it but which must be investigated.
Paul
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 06:04 ---
This one is a real head-banger. The array element reference is being
completely ignored in translation. I tried simplifying it by grabbing out the
array component and attaching the array reference to it. The
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 08:34 ---
Subject: Bug 32875
Author: pault
Date: Sat Aug 18 08:34:42 2007
New Revision: 127608
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127608
Log:
2007-08-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 10:40 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32875
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 10:41 ---
It helps to mark it as fixed
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 10:48 ---
Subject: Bug 32881
Author: pault
Date: Sat Aug 18 10:47:58 2007
New Revision: 127611
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127611
Log:
2007-08-18 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 11:22 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 03:48 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Paul, what is the status on this one?
>
> ping?
>
Go back to the thread on it. I did not seem able to satisfy the reviewer as to
my int
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 03:59 ---
Tobias,
EXTERNAL foo
REAL foo
CALL foo() ! <- wrong
END
with 4.3.0 20070815, gfc gives:
test.f90:1.14:
EXTERNAL foo
1
test.f90:3.23:
CALL foo() ! <- wrong
2
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 07:16 ---
comment #10 from Roger-Sayle is being kept "live" by this PR. Whilst I am
interested, I have to give priority to other PRs to make best use of my limited
time. I may yet come back to it
Paul
--
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-29 19:19 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I am going to try this one.
>
Jerry,
This fixes it but I do not understand why it is necessary; nor have I
regtested. It's yours - I am going to tackle "spanned"
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 32703
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 30 22:10:55 2007
New Revision: 127939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127939
Log:
2007-08-31 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 31258
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 30 22:10:55 2007
New Revision: 127939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127939
Log:
2007-08-31 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #22 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 31197
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 30 22:10:55 2007
New Revision: 127939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127939
Log:
2007-08-31 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:11 ---
Subject: Bug 31879
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 30 22:10:55 2007
New Revision: 127939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127939
Log:
2007-08-31 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:12 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:13 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:13 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 22:18 ---
This no longer segfaults and it generates correct code for valid fortran.
However,
program array_char
implicit none
character (len=2) :: x, y
x = "a "
y = "cd"
print*,[trim(x),trim(y)]
end prog
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 18:16 ---
To my surprise, I have a fix for this one. I'll post it to the list in the
next 48 hours.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 18:17 ---
A fix for this one is coming with that for PR31564 - within 48 hours.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 13:34 ---
Subject: Bug 31564
Author: pault
Date: Wed Sep 5 13:34:25 2007
New Revision: 128130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128130
Log:
2007-09-05 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 13:34 ---
Subject: Bug 33241
Author: pault
Date: Wed Sep 5 13:34:25 2007
New Revision: 128130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128130
Log:
2007-09-05 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 13:37 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 13:38 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-10 07:20 ---
I am just about to commit as 'obvious' a patch that bootstraps and regtests on
x86_ia64/FC5
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-10 07:54 ---
Subject: Bug 33370
Author: pault
Date: Mon Sep 10 07:54:17 2007
New Revision: 128325
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128325
Log:
2007-09-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-10 07:57 ---
Fixed under the 'obvious' rule.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-10 08:20 ---
Michael,
I answered my own question to you - it is indeed a regression.
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-11 18:37 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I want to add that you can find gfortran 4.3.0 binaries at
>http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries
>
> I'm actually unsure which patch fixed it. It might be Pa
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:18 ---
Subject: Bug 29606
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 16 09:17:49 2007
New Revision: 128523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128523
Log:
2007-09-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:18 ---
Subject: Bug 29396
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 16 09:17:49 2007
New Revision: 128523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128523
Log:
2007-09-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:18 ---
Subject: Bug 30625
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 16 09:17:49 2007
New Revision: 128523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128523
Log:
2007-09-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:18 ---
Subject: Bug 30871
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 16 09:17:49 2007
New Revision: 128523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128523
Log:
2007-09-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:39 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:39 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:40 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:40 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 09:42 ---
As the guilty party, I had better take this on.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 15:27 ---
Confirmed - thanks for the report.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33499
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 16:48 ---
Hi Harald!
The number of your testcase is depressing but I'll take it on anyway; it's
related to PR7, as well as PR31564, whose patch caused this regression.
There is some wierdness going on with nam
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 16:38 ---
Hmmm. It helps to actually confirm it.
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 17:18 ---
It's mine.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 20:55 ---
I've just sorted PRs 7 and 33376, so I'll tunr back to these fellows next.
This is confirmed, of course.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 09:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It's mine.
>
> Paul
>
The patch has been posted on the list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-09/msg00378.html
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33376
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 09:33 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> As the guilty party, I had better take this on.
>
> Paul
>
The patch has been posted on the list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-09/msg00378.html
Paul
--
http:/
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 15:46 ---
Subject: Bug 33376
Author: pault
Date: Sat Sep 22 15:46:41 2007
New Revision: 128672
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128672
Log:
2007-09-22 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 15:46 ---
Subject: Bug 7
Author: pault
Date: Sat Sep 22 15:46:41 2007
New Revision: 128672
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128672
Log:
2007-09-22 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 16:39 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for bearing with me, Michael.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 16:40 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks, Harald.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 18:40 ---
Since I made a start on it, I had better finish it!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 18:42 ---
I'll do all of these, having started.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 18:43 ---
I'd better get on with it!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 10:39 ---
Confirmed. Thanks, Ignacio.
This is the fix (the absence of the KIND working and the regression wrt 4.2
were giveaways):
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 11:46 ---
I might as well take it:-)
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 18:40 ---
Subject: Bug 33568
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 27 18:39:55 2007
New Revision: 128843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128843
Log:
2007-09-27 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 18:49 ---
After a bit of messing around, this is fixed on trunk.
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 18:50 ---
Woops - wrong bug!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33574
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 18:51 ---
Woops - wrong bug!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-27 18:52 ---
After a bit of messing around, this is fixed on trunk.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1201 - 1300 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo
