AssignedTo: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 04:55 ---
Duuuh! I forgot a little something...
In file test.f90:19
integer(4), dimension(n_elements_uncommon_with_(x)) :: res
1
Error: Expression at (1) must be of INTEGER type
In file
2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27096
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 04:40 ---
Subject: Bug 26257
Author: pault
Date: Tue Apr 11 04:40:33 2006
New Revision: 112848
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112848
Log:
2006-04-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 04:42 ---
Sorry, I forgot about closing out this one on 4.1.
Fixed on trunk and 4.1.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
array constructors in tonto-2.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http
rity: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27124
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 10:05 ---
Bo,
Thanks for reporting this; I was on the point of making a similar report
myself. Quite simply, I have screwed up the logic for the transfer and have
missed cases such as yours (see the testsuite transfer_array_1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 18803
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 25597
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 26787
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 25669
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 27096
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 26822
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 27089
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 26834
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 ---
Subject: Bug 27124
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 06:21 ---
I have a fix for this, modulo some nonsense involving character(*) results in
defined interfaces. Expect a patch in ~24hours.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 15:12 ---
This fellow now gives:
Error: Procedure 'p' at (1) is already defined at (2)
on trunk and 4.1, so it is fixed.
Arigato goziamasu, Iguchi-san!
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 15:14 ---
HJ has fixed this one.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 15:18 ---
Fixed on trunk and will be fixed on 4.1, when patch for PR25597 is applied next
weekend.
I will close this now since its purpose is served.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25618
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 15:18 ---
Fixed!
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 15:32 ---
HJ has fixed this one.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 15:35 ---
This one now gives:
Error: 's' at (1) must have constant character length in this context
on trunk and 4.1
Fixed - thanks, Philippe!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 16:10 ---
The fix turns out to be almost insulting: One type and one unnecessary gfc_todo
(not the original one, by the way!)
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 04:59 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I can now compile tonto-1.0 without any kludges or tricks. That said, it
> segfaults immediately after reading the input data. I will endeavour to find
> the cause.
This hap
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 05:10 ---
Subject: Bug 27122
Author: pault
Date: Fri Apr 21 05:10:22 2006
New Revision: 113133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113133
Log:
2006-04-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 05:10 ---
Subject: Bug 27113
Author: pault
Date: Fri Apr 21 05:10:22 2006
New Revision: 113133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113133
Log:
2006-04-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 15:47 ---
trunk and 4.1 have diverged too far, especially in characters, for the fix to
work on 4.1. I started trying to make up the difference but it is just too
much to be worthwhile.
I am marking this as fixed on trunk
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 15:49 ---
trunk and 4.1 have diverged too far, especially in characters, for the fix to
work on 4.1. I started trying to make up the difference but it is just too
much to be worthwhile.
I am marking this as fixed on trunk
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 18803
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 27113
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 27122
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 25669
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 26822
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 26787
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 27089
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 26834
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 27124
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 ---
Subject: Bug 25597
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:37 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:38 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:39 ---
Fixed on trunk but,sadly, not on 4.1 because divergences have become too great.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:41 ---
Fixed on trunk but not fixable on 4.1 because of divergences between the trees.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:42 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:42 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:43 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:44 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 06:03 ---
This looks to be fixable at trans-intrinsic.c(gfc_conv_intrinsic_len), here a
special switch branch for constructors is needed.
I will make it so.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 06:07 ---
This has been dealt with, has it not?
I have marked it as fixed - if I am wrong, please unfix it!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 06:08 ---
Fixed if 24406 has really gone away.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 11:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25099
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 11:56:37 2006
New Revision: 113194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113194
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-07 05:46 ---
Subject: Bug 24813
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 7 05:46:26 2006
New Revision: 113594
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113594
Log:
2006-05-07 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-07 10:30 ---
I am sure that this is the same as PR27155, which I undertook to fix. It's on
the list of urgent things to do.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 27324
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 24813
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 27269
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 25099
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 06:25 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 06:27 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-12 04:34 ---
Apparently ignoring the ICE is given the thumbs down. See today's list.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17741
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-13 04:25 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1 - see #5
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-13 11:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=11450)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11450&action=view)
Potential fix for this PR (regtested FC5/Athlon1700)
Bo,
Would you give this a try, please?
Tac
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-13 11:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=11451)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11451&action=view)
Testcase for the patch
This is a slight development of your test; I wanted to be sure that non-
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 12:08 ---
Thanks - I will now turn to PR27449.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27155
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 12:12 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I am sure that this is the same as PR27155, which I undertook to fix.
I don't quite know what made me so sure but would be grateful if you would try
out the patch for pr27155.
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 12:36 ---
At the risk of gettin my head bitten off again, I think that this ICE really
is unwarranted. I can write fortran that produces every other expression type,
therby triggering the ICE. It might be that internal
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 12:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=11462)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11462&action=view)
Patch for this bug, mentioned in comment.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27584
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:16 ---
Subject: Bug 24711
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 15 17:16:26 2006
New Revision: 113796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113796
Log:
2006-05-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:16 ---
Subject: Bug 25090
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 15 17:16:26 2006
New Revision: 113796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113796
Log:
2006-05-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 17:16 ---
Subject: Bug 25082
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 15 17:16:26 2006
New Revision: 113796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113796
Log:
2006-05-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 18:57 ---
A patch is regtesting right now.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-15 19:02 ---
I'll submit tonight, once I have got a couple of other pending patches out of
the door.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 19:03 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I already mentioned before it should be using VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR instead of an
> address and a NOP_EXPR but nobody listened to me in the orginal bug report.
>
> Note this effects
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 06:23 ---
HJ
Your ISP does not like my address for some reason - it keeps bouncing my mail
to you.
Well done! tonto-1.0/SPEC2006 now runs correctly.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-20 20:10 ---
I have been writing to Dylan and Daniel, cc'd to you but your copies bounce.
The upshot of the exchange is that on an Athlon1700, the spec2006 testcase runs
on tonto-1.0 in 1hour 5minutes with gfortran -O3 -
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 05:47 ---
I believe this to be the same as PR27449.
I have a fix in mind that I will try over the next few days (see PR27449)
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 25090
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 21 07:35:05 2006
New Revision: 113949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113949
Log:
2006-05-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 25746
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 21 07:35:05 2006
New Revision: 113949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113949
Log:
2006-05-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 19015
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 21 07:35:05 2006
New Revision: 113949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113949
Log:
2006-05-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 27584
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 21 07:35:05 2006
New Revision: 113949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113949
Log:
2006-05-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 08:21 ---
I have just realised that there is a simple fix for this.
It is my use of the scalarizer to perform the actual transfer that is the
source of the problem. One of you or Bo suggested using memcpy. That is what
I
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 08:24 ---
HJ
Would you also be prepared to try a patch, in a day or two?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27449
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 11:53 ---
Subject: Bug 27613
Author: pault
Date: Sun May 21 11:53:02 2006
New Revision: 113951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113951
Log:
2006-05-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 13:49 ---
Dale,
This looks like a library problem. Jerry committed a change that might have
required a completely clean tree to build.
I had no trouble with the trunk of two hours ago on FC5/Athlon.
Paul
--
http
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 13:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=11491)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11491&action=view)
Patch for this PR and PR27155
This is a belt-and-braces fix that uses memcpy to effect the transfer. I wi
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I applied the same patch to gcc 4.1 redhat. Now I can build and run SPEC CPU
> 2006 successfully with gcc for the first time. The only issue is I have to
> apply 2 patches to tont
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 17:24 ---
Is this standard conforming?
I just re-read the section on specification expressions for the unmpteenth time
and have not clarified it in my mind!
If you cannot point to the bit of the standard that allows it, I
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 13:37 ---
I agree - see the list.
In fact, I have just been hit by the same problem and have to fix it. I'll be
as quick as I can!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 18:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=11507)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11507&action=view)
The fix for this PR
The enclosed patch fixes the problem. It has been regtested on FC5/Athlon and
fi
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 13:02 ---
Thanks, gents.
I am just going to ping the list and will commit tomorrow morning, no matter
what.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27449
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 05:09 ---
Subject: Bug 27155
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 26 05:09:18 2006
New Revision: 114127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114127
Log:
2006-05-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 05:09 ---
Subject: Bug 27709
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 26 05:09:18 2006
New Revision: 114127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114127
Log:
2006-05-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-26 05:09 ---
Subject: Bug 27449
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 26 05:09:18 2006
New Revision: 114127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114127
Log:
2006-05-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
1 - 100 of 3045 matches
Mail list logo