[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrick.marlier at gmail

[Bug c++/46646] New: [trans-mem] __cxa_rethrow and __builtin_eh_pointer are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46646 Summary: [trans-mem] __cxa_rethrow and __builtin_eh_pointer are unsafe Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c++/46653] New: [trans-mem] ICE with volatile int in transactional constructor using -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46653 Summary: [trans-mem] ICE with volatile int in transactional constructor using -O1 Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46654] New: [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 Summary: [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46654] [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier 2010-11-25 08:58:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22525 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22525 testcase with volatile in transaction.

[Bug c++/46654] [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||trans-mem Severity|normal

[Bug c++/46300] Calls to internals _ITM_cxa_throw and _ITM_cxa_allocate_exception are not marked as safe

, ||patrick.marlier at gmail ||dot com, rth at gcc dot ||gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier 2010-11-25 09:39:10 UTC --- I think these functions should be marked

[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Marlier 2010-11-25 09:57:32 UTC --- Created attachment 22526 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22526 another testcase It seems not completely solved. Here a another testcase. With -O0, it complains

[Bug c++/46653] [trans-mem] ICE with volatile int in transactional constructor using -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46653 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Marlier 2010-11-29 13:34:36 UTC --- Created attachment 22563 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22563 testcase ICE with volatile int in transactional constructor using -O1 Sorry, I don't why it was no

[Bug c++/46714] New: [trans-mem] aliased to undefined symbol with -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46714 Summary: [trans-mem] aliased to undefined symbol with -O1 Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c++/46646] [trans-mem] __cxa_rethrow and __builtin_eh_pointer are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46646 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Marlier 2010-12-14 11:13:15 UTC --- Created attachment 22751 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22751 testcase .ii I will try to make a shorter one soon.

[Bug c++/46941] New: [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941 Summary: [trans-mem] new/delete operator are unsafe Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unass

<    1   2