[Bug c/18929] New: Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames

2004-12-10 Thread opensource at artnaseef dot com
Product: gcc Version: 3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: opensource at artnaseef dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug c/18929] Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames

2004-12-10 Thread opensource at artnaseef dot com
--- Additional Comments From opensource at artnaseef dot com 2004-12-10 18:19 --- Created an attachment (id=7720) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7720&action=view) recommended fix This patch fixes the problem by forcing functions to keep their frame pointe

[Bug target/18929] Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames

2004-12-10 Thread opensource at artnaseef dot com
--- Additional Comments From opensource at artnaseef dot com 2004-12-10 18:40 --- Subject: Re: Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames I have not tested it, but I don't see why not. The patch is fairly short and straight-forward, I be

[Bug target/18929] Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames

2004-12-13 Thread opensource at artnaseef dot com
--- Additional Comments From opensource at artnaseef dot com 2004-12-13 15:28 --- Subject: Re: Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames Two things 1. Why do you not think the patch is correct? It works great for me. Without that information

[Bug target/18929] Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames

2004-12-13 Thread opensource at artnaseef dot com
--- Additional Comments From opensource at artnaseef dot com 2004-12-13 15:55 --- Subject: Re: Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on ARM due to missing frames Alright, since my instructions are not good enough for you, I will put together an example. rearnsha at gcc dot gnu