--- Comment #7 from nomura at netapp dot com 2006-05-09 01:35 ---
Reproduced with the x86_64-redhat-linux gcc from RHEL4:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update 1)
Linux nahant.eng.netapp.com 2.6.9-11.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri May 20 18:25:30 EDT 2005
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nomura at netapp dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27515
483648 1 1
a.gcda:counter overflow at 23
a.gcda:early end of file
[brat1]$
--
Summary: value profiling gets "Overflow writing"
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
--- Additional Comments From nomura at netapp dot com 2005-07-26 21:32
---
The implications of a change like this go beyond the implementation detail that
it "can't lose code size". In our product it resulted in 10,000 static
functions disappearing due to a compiler r
--- Comment #23 from nomura at netapp dot com 2006-02-17 23:58 ---
> Looks like in gcc-3.4.0, gcc/gcc/configure.ac picks up the wrong ld for me,
> which probably leads to the wrong value being set for
> HAVE_LD_RO_RW_SECTION_MIXING.
This problem also occurs when cross
--- Comment #24 from nomura at netapp dot com 2006-02-18 02:30 ---
The problem in my case was that during configuration of the cross gcc,
the host linker was being picked for the capability test of
HAVE_LD_RO_RW_SECTION_MIXING. ld is selected around the "in_tree_ld"
part of
