||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-18 00:23:04
UTC ---
I fixed it in trunk.
Thanks
||2010.12.19 18:31:43
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-19 18:31:43
UTC ---
Hi Jonathan
nice to hear from you again (we met at Fosdem a few years ago, not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45953
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-19 19:10:29
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sun Dec 19 19:10:26 2010
New Revision: 168070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168070
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-19 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-19 19:12:33
UTC ---
Yes, I was actually thinking about this, and you're right - it makes sense not
to use retain/autorelease! ;-)
'nonatomic' means that other threads are not involved. Which also means th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 10:56:33
UTC ---
Yes, I'll visit Fosdem - let's meet up there.
> In the code you linked, is that objc_mutex_t a spinlock? If not,
> this might be performance problem.
You are right, it's a normal lock.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47012
--- Comment #9 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 11:38:56
UTC ---
Sure, go ahead and create a bug for it. We can make the change for 4.6 if we
make it safe. By the way, changing configure.ac is not a problem, we can do
that, particularly if it makes
||2010.12.21 11:47:22
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 11:47:22
UTC ---
Yes, and it would be good to fix it for 4.6.
Patches are welcome. ;-)
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45953
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 13:44:09
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 21 13:44:04 2010
New Revision: 168115
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168115
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-21 Nicola Pero
PR libob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45953
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16110
--- Comment #6 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 15:34:22
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 21 15:34:19 2010
New Revision: 168122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168122
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-21 Nicola Pero
PR libob
||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.6.0
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 15:36:08
UTC ---
I fixed this in trunk.
Thanks
||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.6.0
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 21:56:28
UTC ---
This is fixed in trunk; I added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18764
--- Comment #8 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 22:49:44
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 21 22:49:37 2010
New Revision: 168139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168139
Log:
In libobjc/:
2010-12-21 Nicola Pero
PR libob
||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.6.0
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #9 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-21 22:51:33
UTC ---
I fixed this in trunk to check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47070
Summary: Error message mentioning _OBJC_INSTANCE_0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47070
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47073
Summary: ICE when producing error for method argument which
"does not have know size"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47073
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47073
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-28 00:29:44
UTC ---
Submitted a patch to gcc-patches.
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47073
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-28 03:41:02
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Tue Dec 28 03:40:58 2010
New Revision: 168285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168285
Log:
In gcc/testsuite/:
2010-12-28 Nicola Pero
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47073
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Summary: Missed deprecation warnings for @property when using
getter/setter directly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Summary: Protocol referenced in @interface declarations should
be defined
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47077
Summary: ICE on invalid code (method implementation outside of
implementation context)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Summary: ICE on invalid type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-29 01:16:59
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed Dec 29 01:16:55 2010
New Revision: 168307
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168307
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2010-12-28 Nicola Pero
PR objc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-29 12:22:13
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed Dec 29 12:22:09 2010
New Revision: 168315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168315
Log:
In gcc/c-family/:
2010-12-29 Nicola Pero
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47118
Summary: ICE on incorrect parameter to @synchronized()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47118
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47076
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47075
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-29 16:10:51
UTC ---
I'm actually not very convinced by this any more; we probably need some
benchmarks. ;-)
The problem is that property accessors are basically general purpose routines
that may be used in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47118
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2010-12-29 21:52:03
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed Dec 29 21:52:00 2010
New Revision: 168326
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168326
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2010-12-29 Nicola Pero
PR objc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47118
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-06 14:49:43
UTC ---
Yes. In GCC 4.6, libobjc has lots of "duplicates", because it supports both
the "Traditional" and "Modern"
||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-06 14:54:19
UTC ---
Thanks for the report. :-)
It's a duplicate of objc++/23616 though.
Thanks
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23616 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23616
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35891
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36580
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-07 17:56:01
UTC ---
Jonathan
thanks for your comments - they are very useful and we certainly want to look
at performance. ;-)
I'm not terribly convinced by using spinlocks in this context, but I'm happy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-07 18:23:10
UTC ---
I tried the same benchmark using pthread_spin_lock() and pthread_spin_unlock();
it takes about 11.4 seconds.
So, that means the time required to execute an accessor can go down to about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47031
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-08 11:39:38
UTC ---
> Usually, the lock is not held. If it is, you do a little trick: You spin 10
> times and if you still could not get the lock, it's likely the current thread
> is blocking another threa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-08 19:44:34
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sat Jan 8 19:44:30 2011
New Revision: 168601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168601
Log:
In gcc/:
2011-01-08 Nicola Pero
PR objc/4707
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47078
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47229
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47231
Summary: Commas inside ObjC method invocation can confuse
compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47232
Summary: Confusing ObjC error message "attributes may not be
specified before before ‘class’"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47232
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47232
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47232
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-09 22:47:27
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sun Jan 9 22:47:22 2011
New Revision: 168619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168619
Log:
In gcc/:
2011-01-09 Nicola Pero
PR objc/4723
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47232
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47261
Summary: ICE on @property declaration in the wrong place
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: objc++
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47261
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47262
Summary: Better error message upon finding a @property in the
instance variable list
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47262
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-12 11:22:35
UTC ---
I just noticed that this failure was reported on 9 January 2011, but it is no
longer reported on 10 January 2011. What changed ?
I asked Matthias Klose if he has more information on hi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47231
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
Summary: Incorrect multiple selectors warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
||2011.01.16 13:24:03
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-16 13:24:03
UTC ---
Mine; I have a patch already
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-17 22:17:50
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Mon Jan 17 22:17:47 2011
New Revision: 168934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168934
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2011-01-17 Nicola Pero
PR objc
||2011.01.17 22:49:07
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-17 22:49:07
UTC ---
Isdmter
thanks for your report and the testcase. The attached testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44513
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44513
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44513
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43082
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.6.0
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.6.0
--- Comment #11 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-19
21:40:14 UTC ---
This works for me with GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43082
--- Comment #9 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-27 02:09:19
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Thu Jan 27 02:09:13 2011
New Revision: 169319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169319
Log:
In gcc/:
2011-01-26 Nicola Pero
PR c/43082
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43082
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011.02.10 19:24:33
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-10 19:24:33
UTC ---
Yes, this is supposed to have been fixed, even if not by me ;-)
It was Iain
||2011.02.18 03:03:14
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-18 03:03:14
UTC ---
Yes, confirmed.
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
Summary: Some ObjC tests failing on ia6-suse-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: objc
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47784
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-19 05:09:33
UTC ---
Submitted a patch that fixes it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01282.html
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2011.02.20 14:53:13
CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-20 14:53:13
UTC ---
Confirmed. Patch to fix it submitted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-20 14:54:47
UTC ---
This is fixed in trunk (but not really, the problem is just hidden). The
following patch --
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01297.html
fixes it for real though.
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47711
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47784
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-21 10:37:10
UTC ---
Hi Jakub,
> @interface T
> {
> struct S *u;
> };
> @end
"struct S *" is a pointer, right ? So it's always the size of a pointer ?
In that case, I don't see any reason why it shouldn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-21 14:33:14
UTC ---
> for ObjC I guess it depends if in @interface there are variables (then
> variables with flexible array members in theory could be treated there like
> ISO
> C99 treats variables), or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47922
Summary: [4.6 Regression] libobjc crashes with garbage
collection in any real-life program
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47922
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Bug #: 50428
Summary: Consider changing semantics of +initialize so that it
is inherited
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-08 17:52:11
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sat Oct 8 17:52:06 2011
New Revision: 179711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179711
Log:
In libobjc/:
2011-10-08 Richard Frith-Macdonald
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-09 10:29:54
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sun Oct 9 10:29:50 2011
New Revision: 179721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179721
Log:
In libobjc/:
2011-10-09 Nicola Pero
PR libob
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
