[Bug target/64407] xstormy16-elf: ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1730

2015-02-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64407 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug target/63709] msp430 Y constraint generates unacceptable constant in large mode

2014-11-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63709 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/63901] msp430 multilib must distinguish mhwmult

2014-11-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/63901] msp430 multilib must distinguish mhwmult

2014-11-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Peter, The whole hardware multiply selection thing is a bit of a mess... The uploaded patch should resolve the problem for now by building newlib with software multiply enabled. In the long term we

[Bug target/63901] msp430 multilib must distinguish mhwmult

2014-11-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Peter, > In mspgcc, TI provided a CSV file that listed every device along with all > its characteristics. This is still present in the GCC header bundle TI > provides. This in turn was processed to produ

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

2014-12-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

2014-12-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alex, This appears to be a reload bug. Before reload we have: (call_insn 12 (call:HI (mem:HI (mem:HI (plus:HI (reg:HI R14) (const_int 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/64010] [msp430-elf] struct function dereference clobbers parameter passed to function

2014-12-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ulrich, Thanks - ypur patch does work, and it is certainly better than mine. Will you be applying it to the gcc mainline sources ? (And maybe the 4.9 branch as well ?) Cheers Nick

[Bug target/64160] msp430 code generation error adding 32-bit integers

2014-12-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug target/64160] msp430 code generation error adding 32-bit integers

2014-12-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Ulrich, > if (reg_overlap_mentioned_p (operands[3], operands[7]) > || reg_overlap_mentioned_p (operands[3], operands[8])) >FAIL; Thanks - that is indeed a better solution to the bug. > B.t.w. i

[Bug target/62218] gcc produces invalid SH instruction (stc r2,sr) when building libgcc

2014-09-25 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug rtl-optimization/68304] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/950612-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error)

2015-12-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68304 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug preprocessor/68638] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_macro_map_lookup

2015-12-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68638 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

2015-12-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/68795] [6 Regression] Use of uninitialised value of size 8 in cp_parser_postfix_expression (parser.c:6831)

2015-12-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68795 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/68795] [6 Regression] Use of uninitialised value of size 8 in cp_parser_postfix_expression (parser.c:6831)

2015-12-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68795 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi David, > Bother; I have another patch for this I was about to post, which is > bootstrapping right now Oops - sorry for treading on your toes! Cheers Nick

[Bug other/66827] [6 Regression] left shifts of negative value warnings due to C++14 switch

2015-12-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug ipa/66764] [6 Regression] ICE in analyze_function() on AIX

2015-12-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66764 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/67598] [6 Regression] Target powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe failed to bootstrap

2015-12-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67598 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

2015-12-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/68913] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/lto/pr61886 FAILs

2015-12-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68913 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

2015-12-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 37099 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37099&action=edit Initialise the t_icode field of the sri structure created by copy_cost. Hi Markus, Please could you try out t

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

2016-01-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied. (Unfortunately I cannot close this BZ...)

[Bug target/60410] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

2016-01-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug target/60410] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

2016-01-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 --- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton --- Sorry I meant: I am not sure of the best way to proceed.

[Bug target/43052] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's, no longer expanded inline

2016-01-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #32

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

2016-01-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Marek, > You need to sign in with your @gcc.gnu.org address. Doh! Totally forgot about that. Thanks! Cheers Nick

[Bug target/69012] gcc-6.0.0 internal compiler error building libgfortran for mips64el target

2016-01-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012 --- Comment #18 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Bernd, > I am still unsure, if we shouldn't also do something like this, > to prevent any remaining possibility for a further regression: > + /* Don't change the frame info after reload completed. */ >

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

2016-01-26 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #31 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alexander, > Nick, can you please post the patch to gcc-patches too, to avoid confusing > future people who wouldn't be able to find the explanation of the patch in the > archives? > (did you get approval

[Bug target/48897] mn10300.c:extract_bundle’: error: variable ‘s’ set but not used

2011-05-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48897 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48899] enum conversion initializing global_options_init.x_iq2000_tune

2011-05-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48899 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton 2011-05-09 10:07:20 UTC --- I have checked in a patch to initialise the iq2000_tune variable, thus eliminating the warning.

[Bug target/45000] RX signed extened unsigned char or short return value.

2010-07-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from nickc at redhat dot com 2010-07-22 09:42 --- Hi Kazuhiro-san, This is not a bug, it is the expected behaviour. What is happening is that the return value from func() is being promoted to "signed int" (and not "unsigned int" as you might expe

[Bug target/45000] RX signed extened unsigned char or short return value.

2010-07-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from nickc at redhat dot com 2010-07-28 13:55 --- Created an attachment (id=21338) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21338&action=view) Force functions that return small unsigned values to use zero-extension -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug target/45000] RX signed extened unsigned char or short return value.

2010-07-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from nickc at redhat dot com 2010-07-28 14:05 --- Hi Kazuhiro-san, > If the func() is external function, output code is the following. > bsr_func > mouv.B r1, r1 > If the return value is zero exteneded, > "movu.B r1, r1" code can be r

[Bug target/46432] v850-elf --enable-werror-always build fails

2010-11-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46432 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2010-11-15 12:37:35 UTC --- Hi Joern, > FWIW, following the GNU coding standard advice on 'swallowing the semicolon' > avoids the warning: I think that it would be better to just delete the definitions. They a

[Bug c/44438] New: ISO C99 6.7.4p3 not obeyed in C99 mode

2010-06-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: nickc at redhat dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44438

[Bug target/49403] v850e-elf: incompatible pointer type (near initialization for ‘targetm.memory_move_cost’)

2011-06-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49403 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-14 15:32:13 UTC --- Fixed in mainline.

[Bug target/49402] Duplicate use of v850.opt

2011-06-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49402 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton 2011-06-14 15:32:49 UTC --- Fixed in mainline.

[Bug middle-end/49899] New: ICE when redeclaring a static function as weak

2011-07-29 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49899 Summary: ICE when redeclaring a static function as weak Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo

[Bug tree-optimization/32575] [4.2/4.3 regression] With -ftree-vrp miscompiles a single line of code in SQLite

2007-11-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #11 from nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-01 14:02 --- Created an attachment (id=14451) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14451&action=view) Add a param to squelch runaway memory consumption -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32575

[Bug tree-optimization/32575] [4.2/4.3 regression] With -ftree-vrp miscompiles a single line of code in SQLite

2007-11-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #12 from nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-01 14:05 --- Hi Guys, I have uploaded a patch for a possible workaround for this problem. It adds a new param (max-partial-antic-length) which with its default value will stop the tree-pre optimization from eating up all the

[Bug tree-optimization/32575] [4.2/4.3 regression] With -ftree-vrp miscompiles a single line of code in SQLite

2007-11-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #14 from nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-01 14:57 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] With -ftree-vrp miscompiles a single line of code in SQLite Hi Jakub, > Nick, your patch is most probably fixing PR32540 rather than PR32575, doesn't > it? Doh. Yes.

[Bug target/16350] gcc only understands little endian ARM systems

2007-11-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #16 from nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-08 13:47 --- Hi Bernhard, I have applied your patch. I made one small change: I adjusted the new comments in the header files to: /* TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN_DEFAULT is set in config.gcc for big endian configurations. */ This

[Bug testsuite/21707] [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/thunk3.C: syntax error target selector

2005-05-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-05-23 08:46 --- Hi Guys, I have checked in a patch which restores Kazuhiro's original patch and which should stop the testsuite from complaining. Cheers Nick -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21707

[Bug target/18341] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/builtins-18.c

2004-12-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2004-12-06 12:32 --- Fixed by this patch: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2004-12-06 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] by this patch: * gcc.dg/builtins-config.h: Use instead of because the latter comes from gcc's

[Bug target/18342] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/builtins-20.c

2004-12-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2004-12-06 12:32 --- Fixed by this patch: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2004-12-06 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * gcc.dg/builtins-config.h: Use instead of because the latter comes from gcc's include

[Bug target/18350] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-convert-1.c (1-3 actually) gcc.dg/torture/builtin-power-1.c

2004-12-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2004-12-06 12:35 --- Fixed by this patch: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2004-12-06 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * gcc.dg/builtins-config.h: Use instead of because the latter comes from gcc's include

[Bug demangler/88539] A memory leak issue was discovered in cplus-dem.c

2024-09-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88539 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

<    1   2