[Bug bootstrap/98412] libcody does not compile with older GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98412 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug c++/98386] C++20 module: file exists failure and success happen alternatively for windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98386 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- Please take your diatribes to /dev/null. Are you able to test the patch?

[Bug c++/98386] C++20 module: file exists failure and success happen alternatively for windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98386 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/98364] C++20 module global constructor emission

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98364 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidw

[Bug bootstrap/98412] libcody does not compile with older GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98412 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- Gerald got their first: * 7e63d383b89 2020-12-22 | c++: Fix build with clang

[Bug bootstrap/98318] libcody breaks DragonFly bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- FWIW my build server is CentOS Stream release 8 (x86_64), so it seems something's different in your setup. The toplevel make knows that libcody must be built before gcc. Perhaps the libcody build is failin

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidw

[Bug c++/96045] [11 Regression] Wrong line and column diagnostic message in a class template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96045 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/98318] libcody breaks DragonFly bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/98318] libcody breaks DragonFly bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/98318] libcody breaks DragonFly bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #12 from Nathan Sid

[Bug c++/98446] C++ modules test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98446 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/98448] [11 Regression] bootstrap-O3 comparison fails due to libcody

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug bootstrap/98300] GCC 11 failed to build on Windows 10. I guess the new module completely breaks this.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug c/98369] Two new warnings from clang for gcc trunk build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98369 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98327] C++ Module ICE on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/98327] C++ Module ICE on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- I cannot reproduce the reported crash -- like I said, I think this is fixed (thanks for the backtrace). I suspect Martin failed to copy the first line of the testcase 'module;' That's important -- it's not

[Bug c++/98327] C++ Module ICE on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98327 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Status|AS

[Bug c++/98372] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed elt 2 of ‘tree_vec’ with 1 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15500 since r11-5942-g059da609fa8b3a08

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98372 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98452] error: unknown Compiled Module Interface: no such module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98452 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell --- thanks Rainer!

[Bug c++/98462] ICE when making iomanip module and all modules after it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98462 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/98506] ../../gcc/libcody/resolver.cc:178:43: error: 'O_CLOEXEC' was not declared in thi s scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98506 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-05 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug bootstrap/98509] [11 Regression] BUGURL quotation problem in libcody

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98509 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org E

[Bug c++/98528] g++.dg/modules/hello-1 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98528 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- Could you provide the -save-temps .ii files please? I suspect something different in the solaris system headers. it seems to be losing the c++17/2a distinguisher in the test name ...

[Bug bootstrap/98414] [11 Regression] UBSAN bootstrap is broken: ubsan/ubsan_type_hash_itanium.cpp:162: undefined reference to `__dynamic_cast' since r11-6083-gb7dfc2074c78415d451eb34d1608016c80b1c41a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98414 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- there isn't a dynamic cast in the mapper (or libcody)

[Bug c++/98529] g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98529 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- thanks for the module file. -save-temps output too?

[Bug c++/98530] g++.dg/modules/string-1_b.C etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98530 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98531] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org Las

[Bug c++/98531] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Oh, I see what you mean. FWIW this is the tip of a deceptively simple, but actually complex, iceberg.

[Bug bootstrap/98506] ../../gcc/libcody/resolver.cc:178:43: error: 'O_CLOEXEC' was not declared in thi s scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98506 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Your patch is fine, if you'd like to apply it. I'd not noticed it go by :(

[Bug driver/98591] [11 Regression] -x c++-header -fsyntax-only fails: cc1plus: error: output filename specified twice since r11-5615-g10ee6da64c574947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98591 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/98414] [11 Regression] UBSAN bootstrap is broken: ubsan/ubsan_type_hash_itanium.cpp:162: undefined reference to `__dynamic_cast' since r11-6083-gb7dfc2074c78415d451eb34d1608016c80b1c41a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98414 --- Comment #17 from Nathan Sidwell --- libcody should be being built with -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti, that it isn;t suggests I'm configuring it wrong.

[Bug bootstrap/98414] [11 Regression] UBSAN bootstrap is broken: ubsan/ubsan_type_hash_itanium.cpp:162: undefined reference to `__dynamic_cast' since r11-6083-gb7dfc2074c78415d451eb34d1608016c80b1c41a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98414 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/98509] [11 Regression] BUGURL quotation problem in libcody

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98509 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98626] UBSAN: vec.h:591:30: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct vec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98626 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sid

[Bug c++/98626] UBSAN: vec.h:591:30: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct vec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98626 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 98626, which changed state. Bug 98626 Summary: UBSAN: vec.h:591:30: runtime error: member access within null pointer of type 'struct vec' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98626 What|Removed

[Bug c++/98625] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:977:15: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98625 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sid

[Bug sanitizer/95693] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect error from undefined behavior sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- there;s no language reason to zero init the base. It looks to me as if Alex's change is compensating for a problem in the pic code he cites. Is that code trying to make a PIC initializer for something that

[Bug c++/98372] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed elt 2 of ‘tree_vec’ with 1 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15500 since r11-5942-g059da609fa8b3a08

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98372 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: "canonical types differ for identical types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/98688] C++ modules support does not work on PowerPC with opaque MMA types vector_pair/vector_quad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98688 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug preprocessor/95253] [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49975 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49975&action=edit test patch I think it's as simpleas the attached patch. Are you able to try it?

[Bug preprocessor/95253] [10/11 Regression] Build failure on MSys. Wrong dependency file escaping on Windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/98591] [11 Regression] -x c++-header -fsyntax-only fails: cc1plus: error: output filename specified twice since r11-5615-g10ee6da64c574947

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98591 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98624] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98538] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_qualified_type_real, at cp/tree.c:1335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98538 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sid

[Bug c++/98538] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_build_qualified_type_real, at cp/tree.c:1335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98538 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98624] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 98624, which changed state. Bug 98624 Summary: UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 What

[Bug c++/98625] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:977:15: runtime error: left shift of negative value -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98625 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- This looks like a ubsan or optimizer bug. I can't see a -ve shift in the source: HOST_WIDE_INT bytes_in::wi () { HOST_WIDE_INT v = 0; if (const char *ptr = read (1)) { v = *ptr & 0xff; i

[Bug c++/98645] C++ modules support does not work on PowerPC with IEEE 128-bit long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98645 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98530] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/string-1_b.C etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98530 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- sigh, not a broken header, it is a broken compiler

[Bug c++/98530] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/string-1_b.C etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98530 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98624] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 98624, which changed state. Bug 98624 Summary: UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 What

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 50022 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50022&action=edit reduced testcase, this is not solaris-specific, but solaris happened to tickle it uniquely

[Bug c++/98624] UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 98624, which changed state. Bug 98624 Summary: UBSAN: gcc/cp/module.cc:5895:29: runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct module_state' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98624 What

[Bug c++/98452] error: unknown Compiled Module Interface: no such module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98452 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/98794] New: @file error checking is inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98794 Bug ID: 98794 Summary: @file error checking is inconsistent Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug testsuite/98795] New: modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 Bug ID: 98795 Summary: modules testsuite testnames Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite As

[Bug testsuite/98795] modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- I've moved the testsuite issues to 98795

[Bug testsuite/98795] modules testsuite testnames

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98843] Building simple c++ modules example fails but successful with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98843 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- thanks Gary, I expect to be able to reprduce the iostream.ii myself, and particularly as (the lack of) -save-temps seems to be significant, I'll probably need to.

[Bug c++/98770] [modules] including certain stdlib headers in the global module fragment of different modules causes conflicting global module declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98770 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98761] [modules] use of a module causes SIGSEGV at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98761 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-28 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98881] [modules] internal compiler error: in tpl_parms_fini, at cp/module.cc:9933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98881 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98885] [modules] forward declaration of classes prevent them from being exported at the point of actual declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |accepts-invalid Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/98885] [modules] forward declaration of classes prevent them from being exported at the point of actual declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- module partitions are probably what you want for such mutually dependent types.

[Bug c++/98885] [modules] forward declaration of classes prevent them from being exported at the point of actual declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- your A-impl.cpp needs `import :B` and vice-versa

[Bug c++/98885] [modules] forward declaration of classes prevent them from being exported at the point of actual declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- My mistake. interface and implementation partitions do not follow the non-partition behaviour. You have two M:A partitions (one an interface and one an implementation). This is what you want: A.cc: expor

[Bug c++/98843] Building simple c++ modules example fails but successful with -save-temps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98843 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98893] New: start_cleanup_cnt needs modularizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98893 Bug ID: 98893 Summary: start_cleanup_cnt needs modularizing Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/98893] start_cleanup_cnt needs modularizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98893 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98881] [modules] internal compiler error: in tpl_parms_fini, at cp/module.cc:9933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98881 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- Reduced testcase: export module Expr; template class TBase {}; template typename TTpl> class TBase> { public: template typename UTpl> void Foo (TBase> &rhs); }; void Frob (TBase&);

[Bug c++/98893] start_cleanup_cnt needs modularizing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98893 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think the right direction is to use lambdas. That would make the cleanup function have a scope attached or related to the variable being dtord. Howevr, we cannot use actual lambdas, as that'd disturb the

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 --- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell --- while I didn't expect https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564224.html to fix the reported failure, I did hope for progress. (the original failure is tickling a chain of events). I reali

[Bug driver/98943] [11 Regression] gcc driver does not fail on unknown files: tricks configure scripts to recognize /W4 and -diag-disable 1,2,3,4 options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug driver/98943] [11 Regression] gcc driver does not fail on unknown files: tricks configure scripts to recognize /W4 and -diag-disable 1,2,3,4 options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 50119 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50119&action=edit proposed direction Here's a test patch. As Jakub points out, we pass -d$ANYTHING to the compiler, it is the f

[Bug driver/98943] [11 Regression] gcc driver does not fail on unknown files: tricks configure scripts to recognize /W4 and -diag-disable 1,2,3,4 options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- spotted the 'file file' typo in the linker error, btw

[Bug c++/98881] [modules] internal compiler error: in tpl_parms_fini, at cp/module.cc:9933

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98881 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 50120 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50120&action=edit reduced testcase

[Bug c++/98885] [modules] forward declaration of classes prevent them from being exported at the point of actual declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell --- This is highlighting a missing diagnostic on: export module A; class A; // forward declaration export class A {}; // <-- here, cannot add 'export'

[Bug c++/98967] New: warning to spot recursive include graph

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98967 Bug ID: 98967 Summary: warning to spot recursive include graph Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/98968] New: complete include graph is hard to determine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98968 Bug ID: 98968 Summary: complete include graph is hard to determine Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug driver/98943] [11 Regression] gcc driver does not fail on unknown files: tricks configure scripts to recognize /W4 and -diag-disable 1,2,3,4 options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98943 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98531] [11 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_a.H etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #12 from Nathan Sid

[Bug c++/99000] [modules] declaration std::__copy_move_a2 conflicts with import

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99000 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98944] [modules] Failed to read compiled module with a non-exported partition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98944 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98944] [modules] Failed to read compiled module with a non-exported partition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98944 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99039] New: cross-module using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99039 Bug ID: 99039 Summary: cross-module using declarations Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug c++/99039] cross-module using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99039 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99040] New: [modules] partitions & using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99040 Bug ID: 99040 Summary: [modules] partitions & using declarations Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/99030] [11 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99030 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99040] [modules] partitions & using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99040 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/99071] New: [modules] ICE with initializer_list & iostream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99071 Bug ID: 99071 Summary: [modules] ICE with initializer_list & iostream Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/99071] [modules] ICE with initializer_list & iostream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99071 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2   3   4   >