[Bug c++/99283] [modules] ICE in assert_definition, at cp/module.cc:4608

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99227] [meta] [modules] Bugs relating to header-units of STL header files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227 Bug 99227 depends on bug 99283, which changed state. Bug 99283 Summary: [modules] ICE in assert_definition, at cp/module.cc:4608 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99283 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/99380] [modules] Unexpected MODULE-EXPORT request when partially preprocessing header unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99380 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/99605] [11 regression] new test case g++.dg/modules/builtin-3_a.C fails for 32 bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99605 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- I removed the scans, they're too brittle, didn't realize this report was a thing * 671f9f5c0f0 2021-04-06 | c++: Simplify va_arg test

[Bug preprocessor/99446] [11 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:1005 since r11-6325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446 --- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell --- Well it would be nice if it could show the token in the included file, but if that's difficult your solution is perfectly fine. thanks

[Bug preprocessor/99446] [11 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:1005 since r11-6325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug preprocessor/99446] [11 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:1005 since r11-6325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97395] [11 Regression] ICE in update_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:2504 since r11-3699-g4e62aca0e0520e4e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97395 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/97395] [11 Regression] ICE in update_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c:2504 since r11-3699-g4e62aca0e0520e4e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97395 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96258] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_parser_declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96258 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/96258] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in cp_parser_declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96258 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97460] [11 Regression] A boost ICE since r11-3883-g068644a14976ce67

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97460 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/97460] [11 Regression] A boost ICE since r11-3883-g068644a14976ce67

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97460 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/97471] [11 Regression] ICE on using function-like macro as a non function-like macro since r11-338-g2a0225e47868fbfc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97471 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/97549] New: include/pstl rebase breaking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97549 Bug ID: 97549 Summary: include/pstl rebase breaking Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/51577] dependent name lookup finds operator in global namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577 --- Comment #17 from Nathan Sidwell --- ah, the logic to squirrel away lookups on a magic attribute list, records that nothing is found. But we don't preserve that negative lookup when injecting these lookups into the parameter binding. So we'l

[Bug gcov-profile/97834] gcov-instrumented binaries are very slow due to unbuffered IO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97834 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- gcov has its own buffer. Hm, perhaps its not (no longer?) matching typical disc block sizes. Back then they were 512bytes, now they're usually 4K, right? Is gcov's buffer 1K?

[Bug gcov-profile/97834] gcov-instrumented binaries are very slow due to unbuffered IO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97834 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- you're looking in the wrong place. see gcov_var and GCOV_BLOCK_SIZE. it is indeed 1k, but there;s some buffer doubling code in gcov_allocate that I don't recall and am not sure why it's needed/

[Bug bootstrap/97858] [11 regression] Bogus warnings about va_list during profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org E

[Bug bootstrap/97858] [11 regression] Bogus warnings about va_list during profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97877] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97877] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_genericize_r, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97877 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97905] [11 Regression] ice in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97905 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97905] [11 Regression] ice in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97905 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- David, to build just cc1plus: 'make -C gcc cc1plus -j$how_many_cpus_available' pass 'CXXFLAGS=$whatever' to override the default (usually -O2 -g)

[Bug c++/97905] [11 Regression] ice in duplicate_decls, at cp/decl.c:2754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97905 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98115] [11 Regression] error: partial specialization ‘class Stringify’ is not more specialized than [-fpermissive] since r11-5663-g329ae1d7751346ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98115 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/98116] [11 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1744 since r11-5663-g329ae1d7751346ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98107] [11 regression] ICE at hash-table.c:137 starting with r11-5663

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98116] [11 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1744 since r11-5663-g329ae1d7751346ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98115] [11 Regression] error: partial specialization ‘class Stringify’ is not more specialized than [-fpermissive] since r11-5663-g329ae1d7751346ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98115 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98116] [11 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1744 since r11-5663-g329ae1d7751346ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/98157] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘tree_list’ in add_candidates, at cp/call.c:5803 since r10-6219-g8b91e848130e45b4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98157 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98116] [11 Regression] ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1744 since r11-5663-g329ae1d7751346ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug testsuite/98208] make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98208 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-09 CC|

[Bug testsuite/98208] make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98208 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49719 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49719&action=edit patch does this fix it? I can't run the fixinclude testsuite on gcc119 as autogen doesn't appear to be there:

[Bug testsuite/98208] make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98208 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49720 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49720&action=edit v2 Ok, I think I'm understanding what fixinclude's testsuite is looking for. Here's an updated patch, using t

[Bug testsuite/98208] make check's check-fixincludes fails in sys/types.h around AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98208 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49721 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49721&action=edit v3 oh, I think I'm supposed to run ./genfixes too ...

[Bug bootstrap/98300] GCC 11 failed to build on Windows 10. I guess the new module completely breaks this.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Hm, I thought there was sufficient #ifing to prevent that ...

[Bug bootstrap/98300] GCC 11 failed to build on Windows 10. I guess the new module completely breaks this.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49769 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49769&action=edit potential patch Care to give this patch a try?

[Bug c/98311] libcody configure checking problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98311 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org Las

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/98314] [11 Regression] Install fails with "install -C"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98314 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/98311] libcody configure checking problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98311 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98316] [11 regression] cc1plus doesn't link on Solaris 11.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Looks good, and separating out cc1plus' libraries from other executables is goodness. do you want to take this bug?

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think this is fixed by 6ff747f023c 2020-12-16 | c++: Fix (some) solaris breakage please let me know

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Another fix: 269e82d49e2

[Bug bootstrap/98323] current trunk won't build with clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- gah! there was me thinking the only networking thing in cp is mapper-client.cc. (It's the only thing that cares about networking. That mapper-resolver.cc needed a tweak should have clued me in

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- sorry for not getting this right sooner: b7b6879f0b5: c++: Another solaris header use [PR 98315]

[Bug other/98328] [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed by r11-6081

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Fixed trunk, 8d8bb85b486 2020-12-16 | c++: Fix template parm ICE [PR 98297] backports to 10, 9, & 8 in progress

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- need to copy some more libcpp configurey bits ...

[Bug c++/98297] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier, at cp/parser.c:19653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98297 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/98300] GCC 11 failed to build on Windows 10. I guess the new module completely breaks this.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/98340] gcc trunk build with clang failure, part 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/98340] gcc trunk build with clang failure, part 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49789 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49789&action=edit try this I tried building with clang, but it barfed about invalid utf8 in libiberty.

[Bug c++/97186] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in maybe_instantiate_noexcept)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97186 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97186] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in maybe_instantiate_noexcept)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97186 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- The error abount conversion failure, if it is a bug, is unrelated to the ICE. I say 'if', because I think there have been changes in regards to whether functions decay to pointers which can be implicitly co

[Bug c++/97186] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in maybe_instantiate_noexcept)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97186 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/91412] Unexpectedly correct raw string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91412 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97177] [11 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26475 since r11-3192-ge9fdb9a73249f95f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97177 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/97171] [11 Regression] ICE in symtab_node::get_for_asmname at gcc/symtab.c:1023 since r11-3192-ge9fdb9a73249f95f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/97177] [11 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:26475 since r11-3192-ge9fdb9a73249f95f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97177 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97219] Generic lambda does not find function declaration from enclosing block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97219 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/81271] gcc/cp/lex.c:116: wrong condition ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81271 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- fwiw, I was kind of hoping the compiler could spot the test of three adjacent bits and do a 3-bit extraction and comparison to zero.

[Bug c++/97268] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_pass_by_reference at gcc/tree-ssa-uninit.c:514 since r11-1763-g27aebb7d6cf14175

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/31775] static object mangling conflicts with extern object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31775 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/97306] New: local extern decls & contexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97306 Bug ID: 97306 Summary: local extern decls & contexpr Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assign

[Bug c++/97306] local extern decls & contexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97306 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95677] undefined reference to `(anonymous namespace)::xx'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95677 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/31775] static object mangling conflicts with extern object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31775 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/95263] [11 Regression] ICE in lookup_template_class_1 since r11-504-g74744bb1f2847b5b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95263 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/93606] -fdirectives-only and raw string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93606 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/98340] gcc trunk build with clang failure, part 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Now I look carefully, it appears to be trying to compile libiberty.a (the library) as a source file. Of course that'll barf. Configured using "CXX='clang -x c++ -std=c++11' CC=clang" (Of course I didn't

[Bug bootstrap/98340] gcc trunk build with clang failure, part 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98358] new test case g++.dg/template/pr98297.C in r8-10683 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98358 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/98315] [11 regression] libcody breaks Solaris bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98315 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98356] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_dot_deref_incomplete, at cp/parser.c:7899 since r9-4841-g2139fd74f31449c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98356 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/98369] Two new warnings from clang for gcc trunk build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98369 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98363] C++ 20 module ICE for fast_io library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98363 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- FWIW I think it premature to start agressively filing these kinds of defects. We haven't added the module testsuite yet.

[Bug c++/98362] bad file data on Windows for C++ 20 module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98362 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/98362] bad file data on Windows for C++ 20 module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98362 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49797 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49797&action=edit test patch care to try this?

[Bug c++/98364] C++20 module global constructor emission

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98364 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c++/98362] bad file data on Windows for C++ 20 module

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98362 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- * 785b49434d2 2020-12-18 | c++: Fix windows binary files [PR 98362]

[Bug c++/98409] Installing g++-mapper-server fails when cross compiling to Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98409 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- It's me having a thinko about case sensitivity.

[Bug bootstrap/98412] libcody does not compile with older GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98412 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98409] Installing g++-mapper-server fails when cross compiling to Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98409 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/98324] [11 Regression] bootstrap broken with a LTO build configured with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49821 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49821&action=edit add pie try this patch on top of: 626b63d63a2 2020-12-21 | libcody: Add ranlib I could reproduce the error,

[Bug bootstrap/98318] libcody breaks DragonFly bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/98412] libcody does not compile with older GCC versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98412 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49822 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49822&action=edit test patch Can you try this? I guess we're finding the limitations of 'requires C++11' :)

[Bug c++/98386] C++20 module: file exists failure and success happen alternatively for windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98386 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Hm does rename(2) fail on windows if the new name exists? (in posix it replaces, otherwise there's gonna be a race condition)

[Bug c++/98386] C++20 module: file exists failure and success happen alternatively for windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98386 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 49823 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49823&action=edit test patch This does an unlink before the rename, and also adds more logging. If it fails, please try with -f

[Bug c++/98386] C++20 module: file exists failure and success happen alternatively for windows.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98386 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

<    1   2   3   4   >