https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82506
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
We fail to stringize raw string literals containing \n chars:
./xg++ -B./ q.cc -E
gives:
"R\"(
)\""
(snipping line markers). That's a regular string literal with a naked LF char
in it. This is like the
||2017-10-10
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82506
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 10 18:56:31 2017
New Revision: 253605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] preprocessor stringizing raw strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82506
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comm
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In working on the modules branch I discovered TYPE node size determination is
messed up.
tree_code_size returns sizeof (tree_type_non_common) for all tcc_type nodes.
Not
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
The raw dump is not an interchange format.
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82546
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 17 14:49:05 2017
New Revision: 253817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH PR/82546] tree node size
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82577
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 17 15:42:19 2017
New Revision: 253819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH, middle-end/82577] Fix DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME ICE
https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82577
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 17 15:52:21 2017
New Revision: 253820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253820&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[C++ PATCH 82560] missing dtor call
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42384
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42384&action=edit
compile with -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero
the attached program, when usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82584
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
The make_unique bit's irrelevant:
std::discrete_distribution X (weights.begin(), weights.end());
is sufficient.
Reading 29.6.8.6.1 suggests the code is well formed, but all (two) probabilites
are zero
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82546
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed on gcc-7 branch r253822.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 17 17:27:11 2017
New Revision: 253822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[C++ PATCH 82560] missing dtor call
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
||2017-10-25
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Richard is correct, and I picked the existing Wparenthesis warning to enable
it. However, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Ah, I remember now. The ABI specifies the data layout of the various RTTI
objects like _ZTVN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_infoE. It does not specify the
vtable layout -- implementations are free to add additi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82710
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 2 18:26:29 2017
New Revision: 254349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/82710] false positive paren warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82710
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82710
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Nov 3 13:16:06 2017
New Revision: 254371
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254371&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/82710] false positive paren warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737
--- Comment #19 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I can take a look at the trunk crash, but not till next week. You could try
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00384.html, which I've yet to
commit.
gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #21 from Nathan Sidwell ---
yeah, I messed up. I had presumed that once set, DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME does not
change. That is untrue.
In this case it's even worse, in that DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME is set on a new decl
that duplicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82836
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Nov 15 13:18:09 2017
New Revision: 254768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/81574] lambda capture of function reference
https://gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81574
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81060
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 16 12:11:36 2017
New Revision: 254817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/81060] ICE with invalid initialzer via lambda
https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79331
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737
--- Comment #23 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 16 14:54:54 2017
New Revision: 254823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254823&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] New lang hook
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82836
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 16 14:54:54 2017
New Revision: 254823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254823&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] New lang hook
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg013
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82836
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82737
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42623
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42623&action=edit
exemplar
We like to optimize m
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42625
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42625&action=edit
exemplar
on x86_64 compiled with -O2 -fdump-tree-all, th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Yes, this is a measurable degradation in going from gcc 4.9 -> 5.0 with myrocks
DB. Apparently 25% more queries/sec with gcc 4.9 (I think it's from a
benchmark). Profiling (by others) has fingered this opt
||2017-11-17
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
working on a patch. This also occurred in mysql 5.6, and the 5.7 release
refactored the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I recall discussion years back that concluded the
int *p = &a.s[-1];
case was well formed (there being no access specifier between the two fields).
Of course the validity of the argument may have changed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Nov 20 14:39:00 2017
New Revision: 254958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/82878] pass-by-invisiref in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78495
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Nov 20 14:39:00 2017
New Revision: 254958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/82878] pass-by-invisiref in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2017-11-22
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59930
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
When we parse the template friend declaration, we're not injecting an invisible
template decl into the enclosing namespace.
When we instantiate the template we do an unqualified lookup (and ask for
hidden o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
When checking the default arg during parsing, we perform an implicit conversion
inside an unevaluated_operand context. That's needed to fix 54198, where an
ill-formed instantiation occurs otherwise.
Howe
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83187
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Nov 29 13:22:44 2017
New Revision: 255231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255231&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH] complex type canonicalization
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83187
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83287
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Dec 5 17:29:58 2017
New Revision: 255429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR C++/83287] Mark lookup for keeping
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83287
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83309
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
yeah, I'm not surprised by these numbers. IIUC the linear search happens when
we get a qualified lookup during parsing. Unqualified lookup will find the
IDENTIFIER_VALUE binding. But ICBW.
Anyway, when I
||2016-09-09
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77539
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Sep 14 14:29:01 2016
New Revision: 240136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/77539
* constexpr.c (get_fundef_copy)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77539
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Sep 14 16:13:52 2016
New Revision: 240138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77539
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr77539.C: New.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77539
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66443
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Oct 7 20:01:17 2016
New Revision: 240874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/64433
DR1658, DR1611
* init.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64433
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Oct 7 20:01:17 2016
New Revision: 240874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/64433
DR1658, DR1611
* init.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66443
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32658
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 40062
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40062&action=edit
reduced source code
I've reduced the original source to the attached. This emits 4 function
symbols, 2 of whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65954
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed May 20 01:54:09 2015
New Revision: 223430
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223430&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/65954
* typeck.c (finish_class_member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65954
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu May 21 20:50:45 2015
New Revision: 223502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/60943
* decl2.c (change_return_type):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sat May 23 22:28:54 2015
New Revision: 223613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223613&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/65936
* pt.c (lookup_template_class_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65936
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sun May 24 23:17:58 2015
New Revision: 223636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/66243
* decl.c (build_enumerator): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66243
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66270
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed May 27 20:36:14 2015
New Revision: 223773
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223773&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66270
* tree.c (build_pointer_type_for_mode): Can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66270
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Oct 6 16:47:00 2015
New Revision: 228536
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228536&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 67861
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_builtin): Add brea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Oct 9 14:13:39 2015
New Revision: 228657
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228657&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_init_axis_predicate): Fix output
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I think my firstprivate patch resolves this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68977
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
As the code is ill-formed, and IIUC the error only happens if we;ve seen an
error, I suggest
push_gimplify_context (!seen_error ());
No point making the compiler work harder than necesary in the usual case?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69033
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
patch r231928 reverted. Analysis at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg02100.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jan 5 14:40:11 2016
New Revision: 232075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/cp/
PR c++/58583
* pt.c (build_non_dependent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58583, which changed state.
Bug 58583 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member
initialization in template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Jun 5 13:35:30 2015
New Revision: 224152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/52595
* parser.c (cp_parser_cache_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 52595, which changed state.
Bug 52595 Summary: [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers
don't mix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2015-06-08
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jun 16 01:59:55 2015
New Revision: 224502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/58583
* cp-tree.h (DECL_INSTANTIATING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58583, which changed state.
Bug 58583 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member
initialization in template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583
What|Removed
||2015-07-28
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67027
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38881
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38881&action=edit
testcase
Iain Sandoe & I have discovered an anomaly with the placement of bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
701 - 800 of 1171 matches
Mail list logo
