https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 29 12:50:45 2018
New Revision: 266614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87531] operator= lookup in templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87531
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 45169
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45169&action=edit
non operator= version
This turns out to be an orthogonal regression as shown by the new testcase. We
fail to
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed on gomp4 r233663. Porting to trunk ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Feb 24 13:38:20 2016
New Revision: 233663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR other/69916
* omp-low.c (struct oacc_loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69916
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Mar 7 13:22:07 2016
New Revision: 234026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234026&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/69916
* omp-low.c (struct oac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
the intended current implementation is to treat 'sum' as firstprivate.
however, putting in an explicit firstprivate causes another different ICE (in
lower_oacc_reductions) -- regardless of whether 'sum' is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Indeed, manually editing the assembly to such an initializer results in a
working program.
The CONSTRUCTOR created for ab's DECL_INITIAL has the correct things in it,
but in declaration order. I.e. it l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
One can turn it into the syntactically correct:
template
struct integral_constant {
};
struct X : integral_constant < b
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Mar 31 15:30:33 2016
New Revision: 234636
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234636&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70393
* varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_fiel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Mar 31 20:51:20 2016
New Revision: 234653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234653&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70393
* varasm.c (output_constructor_regular_fie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70393
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Applied to gcc-5 branch r234653.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68475
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Apr 1 12:10:17 2016
New Revision: 234667
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234667&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68475
* decl.c (check_redeclaration_exception_spe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68475
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Marek, I suspected something like what you say happening, I think we then need
to go through all the 'struct S' typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Apr 5 23:47:21 2016
New Revision: 234768
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234768&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70512
* class.c (fixup_may_alias): New.
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70512
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00191.html
but read the thread for why that's not the best patch. Continuing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Patrick's original patch did 2 things AFAICT
1) make constexpr_call_table GC deletable
2) add the fundef_copies_table etc.
The failure we're observing is of constexpr_call_table losing information,
which t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #9)
> The decls belonging to a copy of a function must have new UIDs though
> because their uids are used to track their mutable values (within the
> constexpr_ctx::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> If you remove the deletableness, then I'd say it is really important to
> empty the whole freelist at least at the end of parsing, so that when GIMPLE
> optim
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #19 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
> I still don't understand why/how this is causing problems, if
> -fcompare-debug only cares about the order of decls. The copied decls
> shouldn't appear anywh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #27 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #26)
> With this patch gengtype seems to assign gt_ggc_mx(tree&) to cp/constexpr.o,
> breaking cc1 link. I'm not going to try to fix that now, though someone
> else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Apr 12 16:24:11 2016
New Revision: 234904
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234904&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70501
cp/
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_bare_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70501
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nathan at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70685
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I'm such a doofus :(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70616
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55635
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Wed Apr 20 19:59:56 2016
New Revision: 235297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
cp/
PR c++/55635
* init.c (build_vec_delete_1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55635
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38345
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38345&action=edit
testcase
Invoked as:
nathan@morden:28>./cc1plus -fpreprocessed cexpr-error.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 38514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38514&action=edit
slightly more reduced test case
We're invoking constexpr evaluation machinery after parsing is complete --
fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
build_vec_init_elt (tree.c) says:
/* Subroutine of build_vec_init_expr: Build up a single element
intialization as a proxy for the full array initialization to get things
marked as used and any approp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Adding an at_eof check into try_const fixes the testcase. (also) Adding an
at_eof <= 1 assert into cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr causes 261 new fails.
Although many are obviously init & ctor related, th
||2016-06-06
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Testing patch. Aaron's isn't quite right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71400
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Jun 6 15:24:24 2016
New Revision: 237135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgcc/71400
* libgcov-driver-system.c (__gcov_error_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71400
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81899
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Aug 21 13:29:20 2017
New Revision: 251227
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251227&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81899
* pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81899
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81921
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Aug 25 12:32:54 2017
New Revision: 251351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Retabify 2017-08-24 Richard Biener
PR target/81921
Modified:
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42162
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42162&action=edit
generates undemanglable symbol
the attached program generates a call to the
||2017-09-13
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18805
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 42164
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42164&action=edit
simpler testcase
A slightly simpler testcase. The mangling of the Capture instantiation is:
_Z7CaptureIZZ3Foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Created attachment 42171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42171&action=edit
Further simplified
Further simplification removes the inner lambda. The key problem is needing to
name object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |demangler
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:23:57 2017
New Revision: 252815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[demangler] Fix nested generic lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82195, which changed state.
Bug 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 82195, which changed state.
Bug 82195 Summary: Undemangleable lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
What|Removed |Added
--
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42213
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42213&action=edit
example frob(int) is inlined into caller.
the dwarf info for an inlinable function's a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Sep 21 15:52:31 2017
New Revision: 253075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[demangler PATCH]: Revert and update generic lambda demangling
https://
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Sep 26 02:38:12 2017
New Revision: 253186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR demangler/82195
* cp-demangle.c (d_encoding): Strip r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79369
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 15 19:35:52 2017
New Revision: 248073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/cp/
PR c++/79369
* cp-tree.h (DECL_NAMESPACE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79369
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79369
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 15 20:26:19 2017
New Revision: 248075
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248075&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79369
* g++.dg/cpp1z/nested-namespace-def1.C: Adj
at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
This compiles fine on my modules branch, so I guess addressed by some of the
symbol table patches I have yet to port. Will add testcase there and recheck
once porting is complete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 22 12:05:41 2017
New Revision: 248329
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR c++/80830
* g++.dg/lookup/frie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80866
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80866
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue May 23 17:04:56 2017
New Revision: 248377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80866
* parser.c (cp_parser_template_id): Keep th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80866
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2017-05-26
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 29 11:51:13 2017
New Revision: 248570
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248570&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80891 (#2)
* tree.c (ovl_copy): Adjust assert, co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Case #2 fixed r248570.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 29 12:52:58 2017
New Revision: 248571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80891 (#3)
* cp-tree.h (build_min_nt_call_vec): D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 29 14:08:04 2017
New Revision: 248573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80891 (#1)
* pt.c (most_specialized_instantiation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Case #1 fixed r248573.
Leaving defect open to address concern described in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg02189.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 29 16:50:41 2017
New Revision: 248576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80891 (#4)
* ptree.c (cxx_print_xnode): Show inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon May 29 19:45:42 2017
New Revision: 248578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80891 (#1,#5)
* cp-tree.h (lookup_maybe_add): Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80891
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
New deduping code added in r248578 to address problem described in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg02189.html
Also fixes #5.
Thanks Markus!
||2017-05-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
My money's on:
Stat hack representation
* name-lookup.c (STAT_HACK_P, STAT_TYPE, STAT_DECL,
MAYBE_STAT_DECL, MAYBE_STAT_TYPE): New.
(stat_hack): New.
(find_namespace_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
oh, you said that in the title :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
yes, must be something with a 32-bit target. I can reproduce it on x86_64
linux host targeting either i386-linux or i386-solaris.
We have a TYPE_DECL whose TREE_CHAIN points to itself. So when the spelli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I have a small reproducer, regardless of bitsize:
extern int meminfo ();
struct meminfo {};
void frob ()
{
meminf ();
}
stat hack when the struct decl is last. It looks like a patch I have on the
modul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
It doesn't appear to be the stathack patch at fault here. I still get the
infinite loop with my reduced testcase when I revert it. (Which is good,
because I can't see how that patch could cause this behavi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell ---
I cannot reproduce this. an x86_64-linux host using
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
How exactly is gcc being configured and built? Alternatively, is is possible
for a self-contained testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
--- Comment #10 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue May 30 14:43:45 2017
New Revision: 248687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80913
* name-lookup.c (add_decl_to_level): Asser
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80913
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Works for me:
/data/users/nathans/trunk/obj/x86_64-lto/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/data/users/nathans/trunk/obj/x86_64-lto/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++
-B/data/users/nathans/trunk/obj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80915
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2017-06-06
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Jun 6 15:06:56 2017
New Revision: 248922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80979
* name-lookup.c (adl_class_only): Don't add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80979
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
My name lookup patches may have caused this report from François Dumont:
I think your patch:
2017-05-30 Nathan Sidwell
Kill IDENTIFIER_NAMESPACE_BINDINGS
* cp-tree.h (lang_identifier
401 - 500 of 1171 matches
Mail list logo
