[Bug target/49202] New: MMIX: Wrong debugging information generated (UNKNOWN: length 2)

2011-05-27 Thread n...@script-solution.de
Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: n...@script-solution.de Host: Ubuntu on x86_64 Target: MMIX Build: gcc-4.6.0 with binutils-2.21 Created attachment 24381 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24

[Bug target/49211] New: MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

2011-05-28 Thread n...@script-solution.de
Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: n...@script-solution.de Host: Ubuntu on x86_64 Target: MMIX Build: gcc-4.6.0 with binutils-2.21 Created attachment 24386 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

2011-05-28 Thread n...@script-solution.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 Nils Asmussen changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

2011-05-30 Thread n...@script-solution.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 --- Comment #3 from Nils Asmussen 2011-05-30 14:47:40 UTC --- Thanks for your reply! Perhaps I miss something, but I've no idea how that should work. Regardless of whether $254 is initialized previously or not (in my case, it's a bootloader, so

[Bug target/49211] MMIX: Code generation broken, when using global variables

2011-05-30 Thread n...@script-solution.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49211 --- Comment #5 from Nils Asmussen 2011-05-30 15:22:37 UTC --- > Again, I suggest you have a look at crtn.asm, in particular these lines: > > % This must be the last file on the link-line, allocating global registers > % from the top. > > % Regi

[Bug target/49202] MMIX: Wrong debugging information generated (UNKNOWN: length 2)

2011-07-07 Thread n...@script-solution.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49202 --- Comment #2 from Nils Asmussen 2011-07-07 23:10:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I hope to check this some time in the next four weeks... > At a glance, it might be a binutils issue, with the relocs message. Thanks. I don't know if it he