https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #21 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm fine with Backporting for affected branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I changed the test case around, and the linker seems to be able to resolve from
a .a now:
$ ar -q liblib.a lib.o
$ nm -m liblib.a
liblib.a(lib.o):
0020 (__TEXT,__eh_frame) non-external
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380
--- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, yes, likely it would be ar that has changed. Anyway, the ld version is a
cheap indirect proxy for bugs in ar. We're likely to get new ar versions with
new ld versions. A real config te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You can test it if you can dump the ar symbol table, with a assembled .s file.
Nothing needs to work except the assembler and ar and the tool to dump the
symbol table. In the olden days, there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87380
--- Comment #18 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, didn't you just say that it works on darwin8 and later and is broken on
darwin7? If so, then darwin8.h needs the #define (since it is the first
version where ar has been fixed). ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm fine with Backporting for affected branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912
--- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, what you say seems reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55679
--- Comment #19 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17
21:29:01 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu Jan 17 21:28:56 2013
New Revision: 195281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195281
Log:
PR sanitiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53235
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-20
20:35:56 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Sun Jan 20 20:35:48 2013
New Revision: 195326
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195326
Log:
2013-01-20 Jack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55617
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #31 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Does anyone have handy logs for:
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/profile1.C -std=gnu++14 execution test
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81037
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79867
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Apr 10 17:45:35 2017
New Revision: 246813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-04-10 Daniel Santos
PR testsui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79867
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77654
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60563
--- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The change in c12 is ok if you'd like to do that. The only problem with it is
that then we will not be able to discover when radr://19802258 is fixed. When
people notice that that bug is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:33:49 2016
New Revision: 241919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Jack Howarth
PR driv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:35:50 2016
New Revision: 241920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Jack Howarth
PR driv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
--- Comment #6 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 7 19:17:04 2016
New Revision: 241926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Jack Howarth
PR driv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60732
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56044
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57062
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61109
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri May 9 14:06:15 2014
New Revision: 210277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/61109
* trans
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61109
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon May 12 21:22:20 2014
New Revision: 210340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/31778
* genattrtab.c (filena
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31778
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61315
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61146
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61146
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61146
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-05/msg00316.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61146
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61146
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, weird, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu May 29 23:20:39 2014
New Revision: 211067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/61352
* collect2.c (maybe_run_lto_and_rel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed May 6 00:33:49 2015
New Revision: 222835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-05 Jack Howarth
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu May 28 12:27:05 2015
New Revision: 223808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-28 Lawrence Velázquez
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973
--- Comment #2 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, found it, use the GNU assembler. Maybe a little tricky, as one day, even
that will be removed. At that point, I think we just reject the -gstabs
option. The other option, is to just reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I checked https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01438.html and the
failure is gone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
--- Comment #20 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Sat Oct 17 03:55:03 2015
New Revision: 228932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-16 Richard Sandiford
PR middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Nov 6 20:16:06 2015
New Revision: 229885
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229885&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66728
* dwarf2out.c (get_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 9 18:27:43 2015
New Revision: 230039
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/66728
* dwarf2out.c (get_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #5 from mrs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mine. Mine supports 33. Don't expect it to go past 40. Most folks won't. In
10-30 years, maybe we might need to update to 50, but we can do that then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51891
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jan 9 18:12:51 2015
New Revision: 219399
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219399&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Added PR libobjc/51891.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51891
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:23:14 2015
New Revision: 220218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220218&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-28 Jack Howarth
PR libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:25:19 2015
New Revision: 220220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-28 Jack Howarth
PR libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64855
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Thu Jan 29 22:09:16 2015
New Revision: 220264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-29 Jack Howarth
PR libffi/64855
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64855
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My take, Jakub should review/approve it. The the people with darwin boxes can
check any proposed patch to ensure the testcases in question pass and ensure
the bootstrap works and there are no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is caused by:
--- ChangeLog (revision 203170)
+++ ChangeLog (revision 203171)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-10-03 Jan Hubicka
+
+ * i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Do not enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
--- Comment #10 from mrs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Bug 63892 depends on bug 65150, which changed state.
Bug 65150 Summary: [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64
darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Substantially changing code gen 2 days before release with inadequate testing
is slightly dangerous; seem more appropriate for stage 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm happy to defer the question to the person that reviews the patch for the
tree. I'd like a codegen type person that understands the proposed change to
review it. They may feel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mandating commands line tools is fine. Would be nice if everything worked
flawlessly if no optional package had to be installed, but I'm pragmatic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We can fixincludes NS_BLOCKS_AVAILABLE support back in, this would disappear
interfaces that cannot be supported. In the past, this was a safe thing to do,
and might well be still safe wrt the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed title to reflect that this is for native tls.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20567
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63188
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Sat Sep 6 05:17:10 2014
New Revision: 214983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-05 Dominique Dhumieres
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25285
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I like Ian's change the best. I've sent that to gcc-patches for consideration.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Tue Oct 7 18:59:24 2014
New Revision: 215983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215983&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-07 Iain Sandoe
PR targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #34 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, for bugs that aren't fixed, sometimes we work around them. We can use this
bug to track things like the vendor bug status (fixed or not), and potential
workarounds. Plus, we can list thi
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
lra doesn't check the predicate after reload an output register to ensure the
instruction remains valid. The predic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68774
--- Comment #1 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I glanced around and didn't find how to turn it off. First step, ask around
and find the option to turn it off. From there, we can pass it when the gcc
option to not color is given.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68772
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The work checked in above is unrelated to this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67710
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67973
--- Comment #17 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A back port is Ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Necessary, no. I'd defer to others if they think it is better in the cilk
area. Makes sense to me, if someone wants to do that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #23 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On the platform, external symbols are defined to be 1 or more bytes. 0 is not
one or more. Once that is fixed, then the problem goes away. If you want to
have Apple update their abi for future
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #26 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Certainly adding TARGET_MACHO is Ok by me.
101 - 200 of 290 matches
Mail list logo