https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68827, which changed state.
Bug 68827 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold where requires parameter shadows
function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68826, which changed state.
Bug 68826 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold expression with requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
What|Removed |Added
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
This got fixed by r10-7998.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
-valid-code |
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Since r10-6389 we no longer crash but issue an error:
79367.C: In lambda function:
79367.C:6:22: error: ‘c’ declared as reference but not initialized
6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87765
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
|--- |FIXED
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
No preprocessed source provided, assuming fixed then.
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Test added.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91525
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86002
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 83583, which changed state.
Bug 83583 Summary: ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at
cp/parser.c:38794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89336
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 79627, which changed state.
Bug 79627 Summary: Ice with type of VLA in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 79627, which changed state.
Bug 79627 Summary: Ice with type of VLA in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
What|Removed |Added
-
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Fixed.
|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
A dup of 96241, also started with r10-6437.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96241 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96241
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reedjosh2626 at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
We usually don't backport fixed for ices-on-invalid but I could be convinced in
this case.
dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
This is CWG 96 for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Another test to consider:
struct S1 {
int i;
int j;
};
struct S2 {
S1 s[4];
};
struct S3 {
S2 s2;
};
void f()
{
auto s3 = static_cast(1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96379
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
|int_fits_type_p, at
||tree.c:8954
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed, started with r261655.
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
get_attribute_name, at
||attribs.c:841
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Marek
confirmed|0 |1
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
GCC 9 ICEs too.
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
|1
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90199
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
From-SVN: r240756
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96396
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 96218, which changed state.
Bug 96218 Summary: DR 2032: Default template-arguments of variable templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91365
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 91365, which changed state.
Bug 91365 Summary: Implement P1814R0: Class template argument deduction for
alias templates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91365
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94765
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I have a patch.
|1
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-04
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
||2020-08-04
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
|1
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r245840, not a C++ issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96082
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[9/10 Regressio
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=95935
Last reconfirmed||2020-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96474
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96496
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96500
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-06
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Aaah, I see. Thanks a lot!
I'll ad
|1
Keywords||diagnostic
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-10
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
That would be great to have.
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This triggers the static_assert while it shouldn't, because DR 1227 says "The
substitution proceeds in lexical order a
|1
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92812
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
P1975R0 has now been implemented, but the test in Comment 1 probably still
doesn't work, so leaving this open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88323
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Thanks for the report.
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In this test case:
void bar (void);
void f1 (unsigned short *p) { if (p[0] < p[1]) bar (); }
void f2 (unsigned int *p) { if (p[0] &l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #11)
> Hi Marek, any news on this one? It's three months now...
> Or should I file a new bug for the regression on trunk?
No news yet. I've been largely away from
||rejects-valid
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Component|c++ |libstdc++
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Tuple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83445
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||poul250 at yandex dot ru
--- Comment #3
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94162 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96060
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nunoplopes at sapo dot pt
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
|NEW
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
|NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Confirmed.
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Even GCC 6 ICEs.
|inject_parm_decls, at |inject_parm_decls, at
|cp/parser.c:23893 |cp/parser.c:23893
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
We should have rejected "noexcept()".
|1
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|Friend class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The ICE with -std=c++14 started with r216750. It was fixed by r234442, but the
error appeared.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96675
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
|--- |DUPLICATE
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Thanks for the report. I think it's a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 84796 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan.leonov.d at yandex dot ru
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Test from bug 96676.
template < typename T, typename... TYPES >
struct A {
template < TYPES... types >
void Get() { }
};
void f() {}
int main() {
A a;
a.Get<&f>();
}
But even r150013 ICEs,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96676
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84796
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 96677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
OK, this one is actually a dup of bug 84796, started with the same rev.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 84796 ***
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-18
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Sounds legit. Not a regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96593
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
We should accept the following:
char *p = new char[4]{"foo"};
but we reject with:
error: invalid conversion from ‘const char*’ to ‘char’ [-fpermissive]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96687
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77841
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96687
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77841
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
The problem is probably that we're not doing the {"str_cst"} -> "str_cst"
unwrapping that reshape_init / cp_complete_array_type does.
|RESOLVED
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
The write_type ICE is now tracked elsewhere.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96690 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96690
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||itchka at compuserve dot com
--- Comment
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Heh. Confirmed:
q.C:1:29: warning: extra tokens at end of #include directive
1 | #include *
| ^
In file included from /usr/include/range/v3/view.hpp:25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek
confirmed|0 |1
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r11-2748
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96742
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88003
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
All part of my grand plan.
Seriously though, you must've grepped an ICE that was XFAILed (the only one,
thus far).
ssigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Okay, thanks for the explanation. I guess the warning is more annoying than
useful in this case.
501 - 600 of 9162 matches
Mail list logo
