--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36
---
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #53 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 20:18
---
Subject: Bug 20103
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu May 25 20:18:26 2006
New Revision: 114119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114119
Log:
PR c++/20103
* gi
--- Comment #54 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 20:26
---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 21:25
---
Subject: Bug 27803
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue May 30 21:25:02 2006
New Revision: 114245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114245
Log:
PR c++/27803
*
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 21:29
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 01:18
---
Subject: Bug 27808
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 01:18:24 2006
New Revision: 114259
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114259
Log:
PR c++/27808
*
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 01:23
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 02:11
---
Subject: Bug 20173
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 02:11:20 2006
New Revision: 114260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114260
Log:
PR c++/20173
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 02:11
---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 02:14
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, rather.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 02:56
---
Subject: Bug 26068
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 02:55:52 2006
New Revision: 114261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114261
Log:
PR c++/26068
*
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 02:56
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 04:06
---
Subject: Bug 26433
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 04:05:54 2006
New Revision: 114262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114262
Log:
PR c++/26433
* c
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 04:07
---
Subject: Bug 26433
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 04:07:24 2006
New Revision: 114263
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114263
Log:
PR c++/26433
* g++.dg/template/
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 04:10
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 04:54
---
There is no way to win here.
The EDG front end skips the entire rest of the file:
==
"pr26058.cpp", line 4: error: expected a ";"
int t2() {}
^
At end of source: warning: p
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 19:54
---
GCC 3.3 isn't really a very good benchmark, since the parser there didn't
handle much of the language. We'd have to figure out what it actually did for
recovery (how many tokens did it skip, wh
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:03
---
Subject: Bug 27801
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:03:12 2006
New Revision: 114278
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114278
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:03
---
Subject: Bug 27385
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:03:12 2006
New Revision: 114278
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114278
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:03
---
Subject: Bug 26496
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:03:12 2006
New Revision: 114278
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114278
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:03
---
Subject: Bug 26496
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:03:27 2006
New Revision: 114279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114279
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:03
---
Subject: Bug 27385
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:03:27 2006
New Revision: 114279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114279
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:03
---
Subject: Bug 27801
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:03:27 2006
New Revision: 114279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114279
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:08
---
Subject: Bug 26496
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:07:35 2006
New Revision: 114280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114280
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:08
---
Subject: Bug 27801
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:07:35 2006
New Revision: 114280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114280
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:08
---
Subject: Bug 27385
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 31 20:07:35 2006
New Revision: 114280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114280
Log:
PR c++/27801
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:11
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:12
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-31 20:12
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #28 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:19
---
Joseph --
Would you please summarize the current state of this bug, and whether or not
you intend to do any more work on it? I'm trying to figure out how to
prioritize it for 4.2.
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:19
---
Not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:22
---
Not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:26
---
This is a show-stopper; an installation problem like this would be embarassing.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26146
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:33
---
Yes, there should at least be a reference to online information about OpenMP in
our manual. At this is one of the major new features in 4.2, it should
definitely be documented. Diego, would you be able to put a
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:36
---
i386-freebsd is a primary platform, so we should ensure that we can build
there.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:35
---
Yes, this is a critical problem. OpenMP is a major feature in 4.2. It would
be embarassing for it to break builds for users. We should fix the configury
so as not to build the library on unsupported systems
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:40
---
Has anyone tested Dorit's patch? (IIUC, Dorit is on maternity leave.)
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26244
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:44
---
OSF is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:47
---
This patch is OK.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:47
---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26449
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:50
---
Like 26175, this should be considered a high-priority fix.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23541
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:52
---
Isn't this just a duplicate of 23541? We have it marked as depending on 23541,
but why keep both open?
On it's own, I'd call this a P2, but 23541 is a P1 for sure.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:55
---
This is a P1 -- but WAITING for a testcase.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26556
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26507
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26507
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26528
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:56
---
Reverting accidental change to WAITING state.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26559
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:57
---
Java is not release critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:59
---
A very low-priority problem...
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26573
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26577
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:04
---
Daniel --
Are you going to have time to do the surgery mentioned in Comment #1?
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26655
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26693
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26671
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26727
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:16
---
The idea of this patch seems OK, but let's find a way to avoid duplicating the
declare_tmp_vars code, perhaps by making another small routine to find the
outermost BIND_EXPR in a function?
--
mmitchel a
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26792
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:17
---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:18
---
Will this go away with the changes to make the scheduler not extend regions by
default?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26847
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26938
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26957
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:21
---
Does this have to do with Aldy's patches to make sure that we emit debug
information for types used in casts?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26983
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:22
---
Fortran is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26999
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:24
---
Is there a DWARF expert who could check to see whether the debug information
generated is wrong, or whether GDB is unable to handle the information we
generate?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27115
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27116
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27150
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27177
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27227
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27184
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27301
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27316
301 - 400 of 4516 matches
Mail list logo