--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 23:00
---
Subject: Bug 26122
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 11 22:59:57 2006
New Revision: 112869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112869
Log:
* g++.dg/parse/dtor7.C: New test.
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 23:00
---
Subject: Bug 26295
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 11 22:59:57 2006
New Revision: 112869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112869
Log:
* g++.dg/parse/dtor7.C: New test.
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 01:18
---
Subject: Bug 26122
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed Apr 12 01:18:06 2006
New Revision: 112879
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112879
Log:
PR c++/26122
*
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 01:19
---
The ICE is now fixed.
I'm not sure if the failure to diagnose the fact that a non-virtual function
has a pure specifier in a template class is a regression or not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 02:05
---
Subject: Bug 26295
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed Apr 12 02:05:21 2006
New Revision: 112881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112881
Log:
PR c++/26295
* decl.c (grokde
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 02:06
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-12 03:06
---
The fix for the bug in Comment #7 is to implement DR224.
The problem here is that we think that A is a dependent type; as such, it might
be int, and the initialization would be valid. However, A is non
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24609
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-15 03:47
---
Testing a fix.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:12
---
Subject: Bug 26365
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 16 18:12:41 2006
New Revision: 112986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112986
Log:
PR c++/26365
*
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:17
---
Subject: Bug 26365
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 16 18:17:38 2006
New Revision: 112987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112987
Log:
PR c++/26365
*
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:21
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:31
---
Testing a fix.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:32
---
Although it would certainly be good to eliminate the spurious testsuite
failure, this is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #22 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:35
---
It looks like there was a C testcase, which has now been fixed; is there still
an issue for languages other than Ada?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25737
--- Comment #13 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:37
---
Until/unless this is shown to be a problem on a primary/secondary platform, I'm
going to downgrade it to P5.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:38
---
Basic, valid code that crashes the optimizers: P1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #31 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:39
---
Is there more to do? The end of the audit trail contains patches from Alan, so
it's unclear to me if the issue should remain open.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26459
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:40
---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26534
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26570
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:58
---
I am glad that Neil agrees my oft-stated, but always-rejected, claim that only
the front ends should issue warnings. :-)
However, in this case, we can presumably fix the bug by setting TREE_NO_WARNING
on the
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 18:58
---
Ada is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 19:00
---
Would some kind person please attempt a backport to 4.1?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26685
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26719
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26729
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26789
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26818
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26821
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26826
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26865
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26869
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26881
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26884
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26885
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26912
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26917
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26944
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 19:14
---
OpenBSD is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26969
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27004
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27019
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27020
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27039
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27075
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27078
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27087
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27094
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27095
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27102
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27129
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27151
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27158
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 16:58
---
Subject: Bug 27102
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed Apr 19 16:58:23 2006
New Revision: 113081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113081
Log:
PR c++/27102
*
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 17:01
---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-19 17:11
---
In C++ the type of the FIELD_DECL should be "unsigned int", not "4-bit unsigned
int". So, this is the usual problem that we don't quite know how "lowered" the
representation s
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 03:16
---
Generating the explicit masking operations in the front end seems to be safe,
but suboptimal. The middle-end will not optimize code like:
struct A {int i : 3; };
struct A a;
int f() { return a.i >
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 18:04
---
Subject: Bug 26534
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 23 18:04:33 2006
New Revision: 113199
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113199
Log:
2006-04-23 Mark Mitchell <[EMAI
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 18:05
---
Fixed in GCC 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 18:14
---
The correct fix for this issue is for the C++ front-end to save and restore
information about a declaration as scopes are entered and exited.
For example, given:
extern void f(int);
void g() {
extern
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 22:13
---
I agree that the C++ standard requires the behavior suggested by Joseph in
Comment #1.
However, my patch was not intended to fix this bug, and only does so by
accident. In particular, the last lines of
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 03:50
---
Subject: Bug 26912
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Apr 24 03:50:31 2006
New Revision: 113213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113213
Log:
PR c++/26912
* cp-tree.h (build_t
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 03:55
---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 23:31
---
Yes, this is the kind of failure mode I feared.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 03:33
---
Subject: Bug 27292
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Apr 25 03:33:38 2006
New Revision: 113240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113240
Log:
PR c++/27292
* typeck.c (decay_co
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 03:38
---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 19:03
---
Subject: Bug 27102
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu Apr 27 19:02:54 2006
New Revision: 113320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113320
Log:
PR c++/27102
* t
--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 19:06
---
The problem in Comment #9 has been resolved in 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27102
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 02:41
---
Subject: Bug 27292
Author: mmitchel
Date: Fri Apr 28 02:40:58 2006
New Revision: 113339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113339
Log:
PR c++/27292
* tree.c (rvalue):
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 02:42
---
Fixed in 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 17:56
---
Andrew --
Thanks for investigating this, and for attempting to tolerate this bit of
weirdness from the front end.
-- Mark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:21
---
Subject: Bug 27094
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 30 23:21:38 2006
New Revision: 113399
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113399
Log:
PR c++/27094
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:25
---
Subject: Bug 27094
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Apr 30 23:25:44 2006
New Revision: 113400
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113400
Log:
PR c++/27094
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 23:29
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 02:18
---
Subject: Bug 26534
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon May 1 02:18:14 2006
New Revision: 113407
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113407
Log:
PR c++/26534
* c
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 02:18
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mark at codesourcery dot com|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 15:11
---
Subject: Bug 26912
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon May 1 15:11:34 2006
New Revision: 113415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113415
Log:
PR c++/26912
* decl.c (grokde
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 15:12
---
Subject: Bug 26912
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon May 1 15:12:11 2006
New Revision: 113416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113416
Log:
PR c++/26912
* g++.dg/template/fr
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 15:13
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 15:59
---
Subject: Bug 27309
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue May 2 15:59:50 2006
New Revision: 113473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113473
Log:
PR c++/27309
* class.c (add_metho
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 16:23
---
Fixed in 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 00:19
---
Subject: Bug 27102
Author: mmitchel
Date: Wed May 3 00:19:40 2006
New Revision: 113492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113492
Log:
PR c++/27102
* decl.c (grokde
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:26
---
Where is the patch referenced in Comment #3?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #24 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:28
---
I'm sorry to hear things have gotten worse for Ada, but I'm none-the-less
downgrading this to P5, as there is no longer any evidence this affects our
primary languages. (I've not fully understood
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:29
---
P5: Ada is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27270
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27309
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27315
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27329
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27339
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:32
---
P5: Objective-C is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27385
1 - 100 of 4516 matches
Mail list logo