https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91351
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
On 8/6/19 2:54 PM, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Does the enum really have a precision of 5 bits? I would have expected
> (1<<5)-11 instead of 4294967285 (i.e. (1<<32)-11), without looking at it too
> clo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90500
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
On 5/20/19 11:58 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90500
>
> --- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com dot com> ---
> The copy attribute is i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77574
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
On 09/13/2016 12:30 AM, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77574
>
> Bug ID: 77574
>Summary: Wrong if condition in predict.c
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #206 from Martin Liška ---
Firefox (and chromium) memory reports with -flto=9 and -O2; archive contains
also memory usage graph:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0pisUJ80pO1bnV5V0RtWXJkaVU/edit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #207 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 32525
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32525&action=edit
Memory usage graphs for -flto=9, -flto=4, -flto=1 with -O2
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
I test gcc 4.9 on my x86_64 gentoo machine and ICE is encountered in
'net-misc/nx' package:
lto1: internal compiler error: in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:305
0xb4b0b6 ctor_for_folding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
testcase:
cat a.c:
#include
#include
static const struct in6_addr local_in6addr_any = IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT;
#pragma weak in6addr_any = local_in6addr_any
__attribute__ ((used))
void foo()
{
fprintf (stderr, "
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Patch works for me for net-misc/nx package. Will you merge the patch to gcc-4.9
branch?
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
g++ -O2 pentium.cpp -c -ftree-vectorize -march=pentium4 -m32
BT:
#0 output_129 (operands=0x1413ac0 , insn=0x76e0d948) at
../../gcc/config/i386/i386.md:3177
#1
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
$ cat a.c
struct s
{
int a;
int b;
};
static struct s link = { 1, 2 };
int foo()
{
return link.a;
}
$ cat b.c
#include
int
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Created attachment 32744
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32744&action=edit
qtwebkit_reduced.cpp
BT:
qtwebkit_reduced.cpp:59:6: internal c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61076
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61042
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #2 from
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Created attachment 32914
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32914&action=edit
Suggested patch
Problem was met during run of gi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61462
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60449
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
fndecl deletion place:
Old value = (tree) 0x76d4a700
New value = (tree) 0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5
memset () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/memset.S:90
90../sysdeps/x86_64/memset.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36551&action=edit
test-case
Hello.
Using official gcc 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
BT in trunk branch:
#0 c_tree_printer (pp=0x2518a50, text=0x7fffb650, spec=0x2513a61 "E",
precision=, wide=, set_locus=false, hash=false)
at ../../gcc/c/c-objc-common.c:174
#1 0x0177715c in pp_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #6
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
CC: tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
Hello.
With following patch applied:
diff --git a/gcc/value-prof.c b
y: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
CC: cmang at google dot com, hubicka at ucw dot cz, iant at
google dot com,
mliska at suse dot cz
Starting from r216305, IPA ICF can unify functions that will c
oduct: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
After introduction of IPA ICF in r216305, i686 fails to bootstrap.
I reduc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33738
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33738&action=edit
Patch that enables just a single function merge operation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33740
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33740&action=edit
object file created w/ IPA ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33739
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33739&action=edit
object file created w/o IPA ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
There's how gold's ICF works for test attached by Jakub:
gcc --version:
gcc version 5.0.0 20141016 (experimental) (GCC)
ld --version:
GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.24.51.20141010) 1.11
$ gcc icf-gdb.c -c -g --f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33747&action=edit
Gold ICF dwarfdump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Following two functions are merged:
static boost::log::make_output_actor, RightT, ValueT>::type
boost::log::make_output_actor, RightT,
ValueT>::make(ActorT, RightT&) [with ActorT = boost::actor;
LeftExprT = in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Do you have Honza an idea how to handle correctly situation, where ipa_profile
is called before IPA ICF and we mark speculative an edge in:
#0 cgraph_edge::make_speculative (this=this@entry=0x769e8c98,
n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
On 10/20/2014 09:48 AM, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
>
> --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, mliska at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63580
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63580
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63595
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63595
>
> --- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen ---
> Created attachment 33796
>--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33796&action=edit
> preprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
On 10/24/2014 10:44 AM, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63587
>
> --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, marxin at gcc dot gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63968
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
On 11/20/2014 11:43 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63968
>
> Jan Hubicka changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> --
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Created attachment 33065
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33065&action=edit
reduced.ii
Starting from r212174, following error can be encount
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33066
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33066&action=edit
MediaPipeline.ii
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Firefox: https://github.com/marxin/gecko-dev/tree/lto-stable (revision:
88a7edf3bab2d1b9a2c140c1f36217f4fbdd1e03)
GCC revision: r212778 with applied
(https://gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61842
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I've just double checked that I have the same issue with -O2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61842
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Issue is not related to GCC, same error can be seen without LTO and even with
older GCC. When I tried older Firefox (May 2014), latest GCC looks fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61842
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Host: x86_64
Target: rs6000-ibm-aix4.3
Attempting to build cross compiler for rs6000 target:
./configure --enable-languages=c --target=rs6000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #1
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Created attachment 33494
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33494&action=edit
runtime.ii
Following code (creduce chun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63270
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33495
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33495&action=edit
preparser.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63270
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
The problem does not occur in mainline any more, starting with: r215328.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
After fixed issued PR63270 with r215328, it looks there's a new ICE in Chrome
with LTO:
bt
lto1: internal compiler erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63298
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Works for me ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63298
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
During testing of latest compiler, I&#x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #3)
> Yes it's a kernel bug. I hit it earlier too.
>
> const always needs to go into separate sections.
> const __read_mostly is also meaningless.
Is there any existing b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #5)
> I posted a patch here
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1793662
>
> BTW actually I don't agree that the bug is valid. We should probably relax
> the LT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63409
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35545
--- Comment #24 from Martin Liška ---
Hello Honza. I've been working on SPEC numbers, I will send it this evening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35545
--- Comment #25 from Martin Liška ---
SPEC CPU numbers (--size=train, --iterations=3):
First 3 columns present time (where smaller means faster) and for binary size
the same.
++--++---+-+-
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pch
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Error:
g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63409
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33643
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33643&action=edit
Fix patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63409
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please verify for me that the following patch fixes the problem for
your arch?
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63429
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63409
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Yeah, sorry for wrong dg argument. There's new version that should work
correctly. If not regression will be seen, I will commit the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63409
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 33653
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33653&action=edit
Fix patch2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63409
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed in r215967.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
CC: hubicka at ucw dot cz
Starting from r215794 Firefox produces following error in WPA with -flto and
--enable-checking=all
rtran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
In attached Fortran source file, we are unable to hoist out the single function
argument. The argument is reloaded at the end of loop.
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36160
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36160&action=edit
Test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
On 11/5/21 13:32, hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz wrote:
> |+ " - Paradoxical ragne. Ignoring\n");|
s/ragne/range
67 matches
Mail list logo
