http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42643
--- Comment #2 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com 2012-01-06 20:08:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 26259
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26259
Live test case (file from Mozilla's NSS package)
Even when using gcc-4
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com
Target Milestone: ---
The entire gcc-8.2 configured with the following:
./configure --enable-cxx --enable-alloca --prefix=/prod/pfe/local
--with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #1 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
Invoking gfortran with -v I get the following details:
Driving: gfortran -v -o xscblat1 c_sblat1.o c_sblas1.o ../lib/cblas_LINUX.a -l
gfortran -l m -shared-libgcc
Using built-in specs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #2 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
BTW, I'd dearly love if not a fix, then a work-around ASAP. Is there some kind
of command-line option I can add to gfortran's command-line? Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #4 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> This is a binutils bug, in gold.
> --enable-gold
>
> Please report this to binutils instead.
Is there a work-around, perhaps? Som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #9 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
> I said binutils 2.31 branch, not 2.31 release.
The work I'm doing is meant for eventual production use. The company has
swallowed the use of free software, but using _unreleased_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #10 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
(In reply to mi+gcc from comment #9)
> Is this it, for example:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-08/msg00227.html
Applied the patch to the 2.31 release
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #12 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> Please show the output of:
>
> $ objdump -T
> /prod/pfe/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.
> so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341
--- Comment #14 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> Please try binutils 2.31 branch from:
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/
> binutils-2_31-branc
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com
To help facilitate "const-poisoning" of the entire body of C (and C++) code out
there, I'd like to see a new warning, that would fire, when a pointer to any
obje
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 54453
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54453&action=edit
Test case (otpcode.c after passing preprocessor)
Compiling the attached file (
12 matches
Mail list logo
