[Bug c++/95976] New: [[no_unique_address]] on union members has the opposite-of-intended effect

: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: metaprogrammingtheworld at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- When using [[no_unique_address]] with union members, ironically, each member is now given a unique address

[Bug c++/52757] New: [C++11] A lamba functions is not able to be used as a function pointer when passed as an explicit template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757 Bug #: 52757 Summary: [C++11] A lamba functions is not able to be used as a function pointer when passed as an explicit template argument Classification: Unclassified Pr

[Bug c++/52757] [C++11] A lamba functions is not able to be used as a function pointer when passed as an explicit template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757 --- Comment #2 from Matt Calabrese 2012-03-28 20:10:02 UTC --- Hmm. That seems artificially limiting, but thanks for looking it up -- sorry for the erroneous bug report.

[Bug libstdc++/85517] std::variant exception safety problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85517 Matt Calabrese changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metaprogrammingtheworld@gma