[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2022-08-29 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #16 from matoro --- I also observed this issue on alpha-unknown-linux-gnu, with gcc 12.2.

[Bug go/103847] New: gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64

2021-12-27 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847 Bug ID: 103847 Summary: gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug go/103847] gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64

2021-12-27 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug go/103847] gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64

2021-12-27 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847 --- Comment #2 from matoro --- Created attachment 52073 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52073&action=edit build-without-network.log

[Bug go/103847] gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64

2021-12-27 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847 --- Comment #3 from matoro --- Oh, and just for reference, I did confirm that these crashes do not occur on amd64.

[Bug go/103847] gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64

2021-12-28 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847 --- Comment #5 from matoro --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #4) > There don't seem to be any sparc64-linux machines in the GCC compile farm, > so I can't recreate this myself. > > Are you able to recreate the problem while running

[Bug go/103847] gccgo SIGSEGV in libgo standard library on sparc64

2021-12-28 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847 --- Comment #7 from matoro --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #6) > I can try debugging it with ssh access. I'll want to build my own copy of > gccgo. Let me know where I should send the public key. Thanks. matoro_gcc_bugzilla m

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2022-11-01 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #22 from matoro --- This is still a problem on the gcc-12 branch, at least as of 20221008. Attaching a complete log from a -j1 build.

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2022-11-01 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #23 from matoro --- Created attachment 53810 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53810&action=edit build log

[Bug target/105445] New: miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

2022-04-30 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445 Bug ID: 105445 Summary: miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/105445] miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

2022-04-30 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445 --- Comment #1 from matoro --- Created attachment 52914 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52914&action=edit Preprocessed source.

[Bug target/105552] New: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer in __gmp_default_free on ia64

2022-05-10 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105552 Bug ID: 105552 Summary: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer in __gmp_default_free on ia64 Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105552] munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer in __gmp_default_free on ia64

2022-05-13 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105552 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2023-09-10 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #31 from matoro --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #30) > (In reply to matoro from comment #26) > > We also had somebody report on IRC that they observed this on powerpc (not > > sure what tuple), again with -j1. It does no

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2023-05-12 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #25 from matoro --- Created attachment 55067 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55067&action=edit build.log for gcc-13.1 This bug is still present on 13.1.0, attaching log

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2023-05-12 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 --- Comment #26 from matoro --- We also had somebody report on IRC that they observed this on powerpc (not sure what tuple), again with -j1. It does not seem to show up with -j2, so likely -j1 is necessary to trigger.

[Bug regression/111709] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/s_fma.c

2024-05-01 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709 --- Comment #13 from matoro --- Current state of this has expanded to more of the math tests. FAIL: math/test-double-fma FAIL: math/test-double-j0 FAIL: math/test-double-j1 FAIL: math/test-double-ldouble-fma FAIL: math/test-double-log FAIL: mat

[Bug rtl-optimization/115169] New: [14 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2024-05-20 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115169 Bug ID: 115169 Summary: [14 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934 Product: gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/115169] [14 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2024-05-20 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115169 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug target/115169] [14 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2024-05-20 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115169 --- Comment #2 from matoro --- Created attachment 58257 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58257&action=edit preprocessed source

[Bug target/115169] [14 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2024-05-20 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115169 --- Comment #3 from matoro --- Minimal command to trigger: ./gcc/xgcc -O1 -c _mulvdi3.i -B./gcc/

[Bug target/115169] [14 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2024-05-20 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115169 --- Comment #4 from matoro --- Minimized: int __mulvti3_uu_0, __mulvti3_vv_0_1, __mulvti3_w0_1; int __mulvti3() { if (__builtin_expect(__mulvti3_uu_0, 1)) { int w1_0_1; if (__mulvti3_vv_0_1) w1_0_1 -= __mulvti3_uu_0; if (__b

[Bug target/115169] [14/15 regression] ICE in loongarch bootstrap with checking: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2024-05-28 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115169 --- Comment #10 from matoro --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #9) > Fixed. > > For the SIGILL issue note that in GCC 14 the default of -march is raised > from loongarch64 to la64v1.0 which implies LSX. So I'd suggest to check if > CPU_HA

[Bug rtl-optimization/115297] New: [14 regression] alpha: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.cc:7554 with -O1

2024-05-30 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297 Bug ID: 115297 Summary: [14 regression] alpha: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.cc:7554 with -O1 Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c/114493] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] internal compiler error: in fld_incomplete_type_of, at ipa-free-lang-data.cc:257

2024-06-01 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114493 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug driver/112759] New: [13 regression] mips -march=native detection broken with gcc 13+

2023-11-28 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759 Bug ID: 112759 Summary: [13 regression] mips -march=native detection broken with gcc 13+ Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/112759] [13 regression] mips -march=native detection broken with gcc 13+

2023-11-28 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug driver/112759] [13/14 regression] mips -march=native detection broken with gcc 13+

2023-11-30 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112759 --- Comment #3 from matoro --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Hmm, looks like it is this part of the change: > + if (cpu) > +ret = reconcat (ret, ret, "-m", argv[0], "=", cpu, NULL); > > - return concat ("-m", argv[0], "="

[Bug rtl-optimization/110095] New: RISC-V: unrecognizable insn during RTL pass: vregs with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-u74

2023-06-02 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110095 Bug ID: 110095 Summary: RISC-V: unrecognizable insn during RTL pass: vregs with -O2 -mcpu=sifive-u74 Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/110307] New: ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 on alpha with -fPIC -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2

2023-06-19 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307 Bug ID: 110307 Summary: ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 on alpha with -fPIC -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2 Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/110307] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 when building Ruby on alpha with -fPIC -O2 (or -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2)

2023-06-19 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307 --- Comment #2 from matoro --- Created attachment 55365 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55365&action=edit archive from -fdump-tree-all -fdump-rtl-all (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1) > I tried building a cros

[Bug rtl-optimization/110307] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 when building Ruby on alpha with -fPIC -O2 (or -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2)

2023-06-19 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307 --- Comment #4 from matoro --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > Do you have older versions of GCC to check on this testcase? No, for the same reason I didn't get a complete backtrace, it takes a while to compile on this machine

[Bug rtl-optimization/110307] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 when building Ruby on alpha with -fPIC -O2 (or -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2)

2023-06-22 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.3.1, 13.1.1 --- Comment #9 from matoro ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/110307] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 when building Ruby on alpha with -fPIC -O2 (or -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2)

2023-06-22 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307 --- Comment #11 from matoro --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10) > I think the first patch may result in duplicated notes, so I wouldn't > recommend picking it. Oh okay, so just the second patch then? Let me try that.

[Bug rtl-optimization/110307] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.cc:5473 when building Ruby on alpha with -fPIC -O2 (or -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2)

2023-06-25 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110307 --- Comment #12 from matoro --- Just tested applying this patch on top of 13 and it worked! Thanks so much for the help!

[Bug target/106966] [12/13/14 Regression] alpha cross build crashes gcc-12 "internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn"

2023-07-09 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug target/106966] [12/13/14 Regression] alpha cross build crashes gcc-12 "internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn"

2023-07-10 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106966 --- Comment #11 from matoro --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10) > (In reply to matoro from comment #9) > > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8) > > > Created attachment 55504 [details] > > > Proposed patch. > > > > > > Can someo

[Bug target/104820] mips: ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.cc:407 with -fzero-call-used-regs=all -mips4

2023-12-19 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104820 matoro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matoro_gcc_bugzilla@matoro.

[Bug c++/118751] New: optional diagnostic not given on invalid bitfield reference in uninstantiated template

2025-02-04 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118751 Bug ID: 118751 Summary: optional diagnostic not given on invalid bitfield reference in uninstantiated template Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED