[Bug other/97892] ICE in tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_expr_sizeof_expr, at c/c-typeck.c:2946

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97892 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug middle-end/97898] ICE in outermost_invariant_loop, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:431

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97898 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/97899] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97899 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- @Marek: Please do not forget to CC the author of a culprit revision ;)

[Bug tree-optimization/97901] ICE at -Os: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97901 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-19 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Started with r8-2488-g8e941ae950ddce17 i386: Don't use frame pointer without stack access When there is no stack access, there is no need to use frame pointer even if -fno-omit-frame-pointer is used and call

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Can you please H.J. take a look? Maybe we can add a param that will drive the beviour?

[Bug target/97926] New: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926 Bug ID: 97926 Summary: ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Prio

[Bug target/97926] ICE in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1298

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97926 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/97918] ICE near htab_hash_string when LTO, -O & -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97918 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/97920] [FINAL] -O2 segment fault due to extend derive type's member being partially allocated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97920 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug gcov-profile/97910] [GCOV]"&&" lead to incorrect code coverage when multiple expressions of a single statement fall in different lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97910 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97917] [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97917 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97919] [GCOV]volatile member in struct lead to incorrect code coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97919 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97921] [GCOV]inline function with an incremental argument lead to incorrect coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97921 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97919] [GCOV]volatile member in struct lead to incorrect code coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97919 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 97921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/97923] [GCOV]Wrong code coverage for multiple expressions with Logical OR Operator at multiple lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97923 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97924] [GCOV]incorrect coverage for "?:" statement falls in different lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97924 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, that's who we expand that: : [pr97924.c:10:15] _1 = [pr97924.c:10:15] r_5(D)->obj; [pr97924.c:9:10] if (_1 != 0B) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : [pr97924.c:10:46] v_8 = 0B;

[Bug gcov-profile/97924] [GCOV]incorrect coverage for "?:" statement falls in different lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97924 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/97925] [GCOV]incorrect code coverage for function call for when multiple Logical OR expressions of a "if" statement in different lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97925 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/97941] [HWASAN] use After free not working as per expectation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97941 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-23 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/96734] gcc 10.2.0 fails to compile on mips64 due to crash in IPA SRA pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- All right, I have a reduced test-case (with the failing stage1 compiler): $ cat method.ii typedef union tree_node *tree; struct tree_typed { tree type; }; struct tree_type_non_common { tree lang_1; }; u

[Bug target/97928] -fstack-clash-protection probe miss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97928 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug tree-optimization/97960] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong code at -O3 since r8-6511-g3ae129323d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug c/97957] ICE in init_dynamic_diag_info, at c-family/c-format.c:5024

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97957 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-23 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/97956] [11 Regression] ICE in build2, at tree.c:4872 since r11-2709-g866626efd749ed3e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97956 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Summary|[11 Regression]

[Bug c/97955] [11 Regression] ICE in build_array_type_1, at tree.c:8264 since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97955 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/97954] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2360

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97954 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Chris Clayton from comment #4) > I've done a few more builds of snapshot releases of gcc-11. Using with > gcc-10-20201122, I get the ICE building 11-2020115, but 11-20201108 and > 20201101 both bu

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Ok, so the question is: does it reproduce with the current master or now?

[Bug ipa/96734] gcc 10.2.0 fails to compile on mips64 due to crash in IPA SRA pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/97972] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in moving_insn_creates_bookkeeping_block_p, at sel-sched.c:2031 since r9-2064-gc4c5ad1d6d1e1e1f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97972 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/97973] [10/11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19577 since r10-6170-g8a990ffafaaa1898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97973 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-25 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97974] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected overload, have function_decl in get_class_binding_direct, at cp/name-lookup.c:1332

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97974 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/97975] ICE unexpected expression '(int)A< >::b' of kind implicit_conv_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97975 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/97978] [11 Regression] ICE in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1648 since r11-5066-gbe39636d9f68c437

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97978 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97979] [11 Regression]: Segmentation fault with "-O3 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-ccp" since r11-5271-g4866b2f5db117f9e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97979 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97980] wrong code with "-O3 -fno-dce -fno-inline-functions-called-once -fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-vrp" since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97980 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0 Known to work|

[Bug c++/97962] ICE in build_over_call, at cp/call.c:8976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97962 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- Thank you Chris, I can really confirm that. Working on that..

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49624 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49624&action=edit debugging patch All right it will be for Richi. I suspect it's a do_hoist_insertion. reduced test-case: $ cat

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- Then you will see the following diff in optimized dump: --- good2020-11-25 16:27:16.795544128 +0100 +++ bad 2020-11-25 16:26:59.723620747 +0100 @@ -17022,7 +17022,6 @@ ;; Function rewrite_use_nonli

[Bug ipa/98000] g++-10 internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98000 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug tree-optimization/97990] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: ‘verify_type’ failed since r6-5222-gba6a6a1d44c17f25

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97990 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/97993] [11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:19834 since r11-423-gcda6396a1b6e6bba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97993 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/97991] ICE in c_parser_consume_token, at c/c-parser.c:850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97991 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/97994] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1183 since r7-4383-g51dc660315ef83dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97994 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|[11

[Bug c++/97995] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'deferred_noexcept' in unify, at cp/pt.c:23473 since r7-4383-g51dc660315ef83dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97995 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/98000] g++-10 internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98000 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: $ cat pr98000.C struct { template T *operator()(T); } hb_addressof; template static int _hb_cmp_method(Ts...) { return 0; } template inline bool hb_bsearch_impl(K key, V, int compar(

[Bug ipa/98000] [10/11 Regression] ICE verify_cgraph_node failed since r10-7306-g72b3bc895f023bf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98000 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 --- Comment #19 from Martin Liška --- What a nice reduced test-case. Btw. started to fail with r8-4962-g4aa458f2ac11aef0 with -O2 -fno-tree-free

[Bug tree-optimization/97953] ICE (segfault) during GIMPLE pass: loopdone compiling libgcc/config/libbid/bid128_fma.c:190:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97953 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/98017] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Suspected regression (relative to 7.5) using PACK in iolist since r8-4151-g6c6bde30706c29ff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/98000] [10/11 Regression] ICE verify_cgraph_node failed since r10-7306-g72b3bc895f023bf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98000 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to ishikawa,chiaki from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > Thank you for the report, it's very likely a different issue. > > I'm reducing that right now.. > > You are very

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for the feedback. So do you tend to close it again as invalid?

[Bug target/98018] Option to force frame pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/98022] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_assign_data_value, at fortran/data.c:468 since r9-3803-ga5fbc2f36a291cbe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/98023] ICE: free_expr0(): Bad expr type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98023 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-27 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/98024] [11 Regression] Big rnflow regression caused by g:512c6ba04102295fccc62a173ee0086ca733c920

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 --- Comment #35 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20) > Created attachment 49465 [details] > Build log for s390x Hello. The s390x build failure is still preset. Can you please take a look?

[Bug c/98029] [11 Regression] volatile triggers incorrect "warning: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]" since r11-5188-g32934a4f45a72144

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98029 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug target/98032] [9 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/98032] [9 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: $ cat vcldemo.ii namespace osl { class Thread { public: virtual ~Thread(); virtual void join(); }; } // namespace osl class SimpleReferenceObject { protected: virtual ~SimpleReference

[Bug c++/98038] ICE on invalid trying to recursively invoke a lambda object with operator()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98038 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/98043] [10/11 Regression] ICE ‘verify_gimple’ failed since r10-5122-g6fcb7ebb377f27c7 since r10-5122-g6fcb7ebb377f27c7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98043 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|(Regression) ICE in |[10/11 Regression] ICE

[Bug target/98045] [11 Regression] ICE in compute_fn_summary, at ipa-fnsummary.c:3138 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-30 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/98049] False positive when compiling with -Os -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98049 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug c++/98054] [11 Regression] ICE: in pp_cxx_trait_expression, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:2671

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confir

[Bug c++/98056] internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:9862

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/98057] ICE when build clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-30 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/98054] [11 Regression] ICE: in pp_cxx_trait_expression, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:2671 since r11-4386-g9e2256dcd481ffe3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98054 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Summary|[11 Regression] I

[Bug ipa/98057] ICE when build clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/98064] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:726 with -O3 since r11-4921-g86cca5cc14602814

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98064 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |ICE in |check_loop_clos

[Bug ipa/98057] [11 Regression] ICE verify_cgraph_node failed since r11-4900-g4656461585bfd0b9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/98066] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_next)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98056] ICE tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have array_type in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:9862 since r11-2183-g0f66b8486cea8668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Summary|internal compiler

[Bug tree-optimization/98066] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_next)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49650 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49650&action=edit Patch candidate With the patch I see that the target can't expand it to RTL: $ ./xgcc -B. pr98066.c -mvsx -O1 -

[Bug target/98045] [11 Regression] ICE in compute_fn_summary, at ipa-fnsummary.c:3138 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/98066] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_next)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE: |r

[Bug tree-optimization/98066] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_next)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98066 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/98057] [11 Regression] ICE verify_cgraph_node failed since r11-4900-g4656461585bfd0b9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- I've got a patch candidate.

[Bug lto/98068] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error) by r11-3303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/98068] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error) by r11-3303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I guess it's PR97172.

[Bug tree-optimization/98069] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Miscompilation with -O3 since r8-2380-g2d7744d4ef93bfff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Miscompilation with -O3 |[8/9/10/11 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/98069] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Miscompilation with -O3 since r8-2380-g2d7744d4ef93bfff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98069 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.4.0 Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/98078] New: ICE in cgraph_add_edge_to_call_site_hash, at cgraph.c:698 since r6-1705-gd88511aec7338a93

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98078 Bug ID: 98078 Summary: ICE in cgraph_add_edge_to_call_site_hash, at cgraph.c:698 since r6-1705-gd88511aec7338a93 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/98078] ICE in cgraph_add_edge_to_call_site_hash, at cgraph.c:698 since r6-1705-gd88511aec7338a93

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98078 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49658 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49658&action=edit test-case 2

[Bug ipa/98078] ICE in cgraph_add_edge_to_call_site_hash, at cgraph.c:698 since r6-1705-gd88511aec7338a93

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98078 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/98075] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed (error: malloc attribute should be used for a function that returns a pointer) since r10-6699-g33351ff9faa21c4c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98075 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Kn

[Bug ipa/97575] [11 Regression] ICE in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call, at ipa-prop.c:3671 or in propagate_controlled_uses, at ipa-prop.c:4073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/94932] [10/11 Regression] ICE in ovl_skip_hidden, at cp/tree.c:2292 since r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94932 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/98073] error: in can_merge_p, at analyzer/region-model.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98073 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/98074] [9/10 Regression] C Wrong code at O2~Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98074 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug analyzer/98073] error: in can_merge_p, at analyzer/region-model.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98073 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: struct ist { char ptr; long len } __trans_tmp_1, http_update_host_authority; http_update_host_sl_0_0_0; http_update_host(const struct ist uri) { uri.len || uri.ptr; if (http_update_

[Bug ipa/98057] [11 Regression] ICE verify_cgraph_node failed since r11-4900-g4656461585bfd0b9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98057 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >