https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445
--- Comment #53 from Martin Liška ---
> It goes from 1 to 1<<63, so each of tests translates to a range.
Yes, but these ranges are very large, nothing for a jump table or a bit-test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445
--- Comment #55 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #54)
> > > It goes from 1 to 1<<63, so each of tests translates to a range.
> >
> > Yes, but these ranges are very large, nothing for a jump table or a
> > bit-test.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Bug ID: 97526
Summary: ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> It could, maybe with some diagnostic. It could also use fork-based
> parallelism.
It seems to me extra work.
Expecting make for parallel execution seems to be a reasonable request.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #6)
> If I have make installed on my system, but am using something else (e.g.
> ninja) to build my project, will I still get parallel execution?
No, we construct an art
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97534
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
Bug ID: 97538
Summary: ICE in during GIMPLE pass: wrestrict
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Bug ID: 97540
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at
lra.c:1004 since r11-4202-g4de7b010038933dd
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97539
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49428
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49428&action=edit
test-case
I see it also on x86_64-linux-gnu with ASAN:
$ /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/objdir/gcc/xg++ -B
/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97538
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
Bug ID: 97558
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in
vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at
tree-vect-slp.c:3342 since r11-4227-g655f7f0fb7c9aa2f
Product: gcc
Version: 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97575
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97576
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579
Bug ID: 97579
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at
gimple-isel.cc:201 since r11-4123-g128f43cf679e5156
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Libin Dang from comment #6)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > Using latest GCC release you can see what happens:
> >
> > $ g++ pr96919.cc --coverage && ./a.out && gcov a-pr96919.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I'm going to analyze it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[11 Regression] "ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
So e.g. addr2line is miscompiled:
$ as --32 --compress-debug-sections -o compress.o
/tmp/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/dw2-compress-2.s
The .s file is part of the test-suite.
$ ./addr2line 0x0 0x10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
One can trigger it only with one debug counter value:
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:869-869 (and multiple LTRANS partitions).
The only changed function is in:
comp_unit_maybe_decode_line_info (struct comp_unit * unit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Points to the following statements:
../bfd/../../bfd/dwarf2.c:2321:13
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/dwarf2.c;h=977bf43a6a181d97fa3ae71329478f9f263b090f;hb=HEAD#l2321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
bfd_vma
_bfd_safe_read_leb128 (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
bfd_byte *data,
unsigned int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> There is code in modref-transform that is supposed to update the
> summary. It produces debug output about it, but to be honest I am not
> sure where it will land since we now materialize lazily. Can you do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
Bug ID: 97593
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gt_pch_nx, at
symbol-summary.h:290 since r11-4329-g67f3791f7d133214
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
The original commit was sent here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01745.html
Git commit: g:315d42482cf3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Hmm, this is anoying: we can not store summary to PCH. I guess we want to
> collect thunks to a vector and annotate them to callgraph at finalization
> time :(
I se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11)
> > Hi,
> > this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
> Actually it won't help, since it updates only non-lto summary. I am
> testing bet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49451&action=edit
Build log
It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the build
log.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13)
> Created attachment 49450 [details]
> fix
>
> > Yes, I noticed that right now :) Please attach me the patch here.
> Sorry for bogus patch. This one has chance to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97594
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Eve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97594
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Mine, I see a strange error:
>
> $ Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
> 0x3fffb7ceddbc in __GI__IO_link_in () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> Missing separate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97596
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-27
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> So we have used_vec_cond_exprs == 1 and a V16SI eq/ne compare with a
> vector(16) HImode result. We fall into
>
> gcc_assert (known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97472
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97624
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97622
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97625
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97625
Bug ID: 97625
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in
vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at
tree-vect-slp.c:3342 since r11-4227-g655f7f0fb7c9aa2f
Product: gcc
Version: 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49466
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49466&action=edit
Build log for ppc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #16)
> > It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the
> > build log.
>
> What's this beast exactly? I'm afraid the build log is useless he
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49465&action=edit
Build log for s390x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #22 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #17)
> Created attachment 49456 [details]
> fix for riscv targets
>
> > Still broken
>
> Sorry, it's the first I hear of this problem on riscv.
> The fix is target-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97626
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97626
Bug ID: 97626
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:10900 since
r11-4428-g4a369d199bf2f34e
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97579
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
>
> Hmm, but get_vcond_mask_icode expects the vector mode first and the
> mask mode second. But it would be odd if that's the mistake...
> (but the patterns agree as well).
>
> Now, the code seems to be a b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #15)
> allocate_gcov_kvp() gets called 89 times. Tried as:
All right, it's quite close to what we have.
So can you please test the following patch:
diff --git a/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE: |[10 Regression] ICE:
|d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
Or I may have a smarter trick: let's do dry run of malloc/free functions early
in __gcov_init. Can you please test the patch as well?
commit d80cecdb87d159f0b3a4072b6e1ef80515ad2afb
Author: Martin Liska
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97634
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97558
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Maybe a bit different back-trace:
$ gcc
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-10b.c
-fno-tree-forwprop -O3 -c -c
during GIMPLE pass: vect
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97639
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97650
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97655
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-02
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97657
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97668
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huntazhang at tencent dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97673
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97670
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97671
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-03
Summary|[11 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97703
Bug ID: 97703
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in fix_reg_equiv_init at
gcc/ira.c:2683
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95847
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcy at codesourcery dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97706
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97715
Bug ID: 97715
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in insn_default_length, at
config/i386/i386.md:15325 since
r11-4578-gd10f3e900b0377b4
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
401 - 500 of 5132 matches
Mail list logo