[Bug tree-optimization/99296] [11 Regression] ICE:in irange_set_anti_range, at value-range.cc:205 with "-Os -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp" since r11-5105-ga5f9c27bfc441722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99296 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to w

[Bug preprocessor/99313] ICE while changing global target options via pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99313 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug preprocessor/99313] ICE while changing global target options via pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99313 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Eve

[Bug c/99291] maybe_warn_pass_by_reference uses outdated format string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99291 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug preprocessor/99313] ICE while changing global target options via pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99313 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > But this results in unexpected behavior when there's functions with arch=z13 > vs. arch=z9 and depending on "luck" we then inherit the wrong params where > we sho

[Bug target/99313] ICE while changing global target options via pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99313 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/99321] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {*uminv16qi3} since r11-7121-g37876976b0511ec9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99321 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/99322] [11 Regression] ICE in change_scope, at final.c:1480

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99322 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c/99323] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234 since r8-379-gd1b5f5cc3cfd148e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|[9/10/11 Regressio

[Bug fortran/99326] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/99323] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234 since r8-379-gd1b5f5cc3cfd148e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Slightly reduced test-case: $ cat x.c typedef struct { } REFERENCE; #define LIM2() LIM1() #define LIM3() LIM2() LIM2() LIM2() LIM2() LIM2() LIM2() #define LIM4()

[Bug c/99340] [10/11 Regression] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3) > Created attachment 50284 [details] > preprocessed source > > original test case before reducing > > gcc -std=gnu99 -Werror=uninitialized -Werror=maybe-uninitial

[Bug c/99340] -Werror=maybe-uninitialized warning with -fPIE, but not -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99340 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug d/99337] Sanitizer detect heap-buffer-overflow in checkModFileAlias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99337 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|63426 |86656 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška -

[Bug fortran/99345] [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug c/99347] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-02 Summary|[9/10/11 Re

[Bug c/99347] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.c:4549 since r9-6859-g25eafae67f186cfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99347 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- And before that it was fixed in r7-6819-gd4cbfca47f47194a.

[Bug fortran/99348] ICE in resolve_structure_cons, at fortran/resolve.c:1286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/99349] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99349 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/99350] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99350 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/98656] [9/10 Regression] switchlower_O0 drops line number of switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98656 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #30 from Martin Liška --- > CCing some folks familiar with Windows, while Martin has committed a mmap > based solution, I think it will not work on Windows, but Note the libgcov still falls back to malloc. So if there's not a custom

[Bug fortran/99369] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/99376] Sanitizer detects undefined behaviour in rtlanal.c compiling ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99376 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Blocks|

[Bug c++/99375] Segmentation fault in code compiled with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99375 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/97236] [8 Regression] g:e93428a8b056aed83a7678 triggers vlc miscompile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97236 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Arfrever.FTA at GMail dot Com --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/99378] New: ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6710

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99378 Bug ID: 99378 Summary: ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6710 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/99369] [10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99369 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/99385] [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/99385] [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- I see, that's expected behavior from the test-case then.

[Bug gcov-profile/99385] [11 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof-malloc.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/99345] [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So yes, we'll need all the files loaded as modules. @doko: Can you please tar the entire folder?

[Bug gcov-profile/99105] [11 regression] profile streaming scales poorly to projects with many source files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99105 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/99345] [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Thanks, but I can't see where the missing modules come from: $ gcc postahc.f90 -c postahc.f90:21:7: 21 | USE kinds, ONLY : DP | 1 Fatal Error: Cannot open module file ‘kinds.mod’ for r

[Bug fortran/99345] [11 Regression] ICE in doloop_contained_procedure_code, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:2464 since r11-2578-g27eac9ee6137a6b5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/99406] [11 regression] MAP_ANONYMOUS undeclared in libgcov.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99406 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Eve

[Bug gcov-profile/97461] [11 Regression] allocate_gcov_kvp() deadlocks in firefox LTO+PGO build (overridden malloc() recursion)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461 --- Comment #33 from Martin Liška --- > Tested today's gcc against firefox-86 in lto+pgo mode. Built fine. Thank you! I thank you. You tested various attempts I proposed :)

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, reduced test-case: $ cat predict.ii typedef struct { int *use } ssa_use_operand_t; enum { GIMPLE_PHI, GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS, GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS } gimple_num_ops; gimple_call_fndecl_addr_0_0, gimple_cal

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85099 Status|WAITING

[Bug c++/99445] [11 Regression] ICE in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99445] [11 Regression] ICE in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug lto/99448] ICE in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at lto/lto-common.c:2739

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99448 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/99446] [11 Regression] ICE in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:1005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99446 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/99447] [11 Regression] ICE (segfault) in lookup_page_table_entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99447 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/99450] ICE: unrecognizable insn with lto build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99450 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/99442] [GCOV] No coverage with "Segmentation fault (core dumped)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99442 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/99444] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with "case" label in "switch" statement block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99444 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/99440] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with callsite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99440 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gcov-profile/99441] [GCOV] Wrong coverage with complex "if" condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99441 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/99443] [GCOV] No coverage with "Aborted(core dumped)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99443 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/99418] sanitizer checks for accessing multidimentional VLA-array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99418 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99445] [11 Regression] ICE in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3) > > Can you please reduce it to a valid test-case? > > the run took 40 hours. I'll see when I can repeat it. I can imagine. Or you can try to somehow "fix" the re

[Bug go/99458] libgo doesn't build against latest glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99458 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/99420] New warning -Warray-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99420 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/99461] New: [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99461 Bug ID: 99461 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99463] New: GCC gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/hreset-1.c -c -march=alderlake fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99463 Bug ID: 99463 Summary: GCC gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/hreset-1.c -c -march=alderlake fails Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-v

[Bug target/99463] GCC gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/hreset-1.c -c -march=alderlake fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99463 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/99461] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99461 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99463] GCC gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/hreset-1.c -c -march=alderlake fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99463 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Similarly for: gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/uintr-1.c -c -march=sapphirerapids In file included from /home/marxin/bin/gcc/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.1/include/x86gpri

[Bug target/99461] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99461 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Looks like a dup. I haven't found a PR that would start with the revision..

[Bug target/99464] New: #pragma GCC target("arch=cannonlake") does not work with a -msha builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99464 Bug ID: 99464 Summary: #pragma GCC target("arch=cannonlake") does not work with a -msha builtin Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects

[Bug target/99464] #pragma GCC target("arch=cannonlake") does not work with a -msha builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99464 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/99466] internal compiler error: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa-visibility.c:795

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99466 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/99463] GCC gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/hreset-1.c -c -march=alderlake fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99463 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99445] [11 Regression] ICE in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 since r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99445 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/99467] [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1006 since r11-7526-g9105757a59b89019

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99467 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > Confirmed, reduced test-case: > > > just curious, how did you reduce the testing case with -fprofile-use? (I Sure. I used

[Bug target/99464] #pragma GCC target("arch=cannonlake") does not work with a -msha builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99464 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- > Note that one can theoretically reduce also the .gcda file. I have an > experimental pass for it in C-Vise and I will likely upstream it. I've just added that here: https://github.com/marxin/cvise/commit/ee

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 50336 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50336&action=edit Reduced gcda file

[Bug gcov-profile/99485] [GCOV] When the function pointer is used as a parameter, the coverage information is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99485 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/82094] Improve diagnostics about target specific option mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82094 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Targe

[Bug ipa/82094] Improve diagnostics about target specific option mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82094 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- One similar place where we do something similar is: rtx ix86_expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx target, rtx subtarget, machine_mode mode, int ignore) ... gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/

[Bug rtl-optimization/99421] ICE:in code_motion_process_successors, at sel-sched.c:6389 on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #8) > > On Mar 8, 2021, at 11:58 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org > > wrote: > > > > Sure. I used C-Vise: > > https://github.com/marxin/cvise > > From my understanding, cvi

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug debug/99490] -gdwarf-5 -gsplit-dwarf puts .debug_rnglists to main file, not .dwo file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99490 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64 --- Comment #4 from Marti

[Bug tree-optimization/99489] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: during GIMPLE pass: strlen in dlt_logstorage_log_file_name()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99489 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/99505] ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug fortran/99506] internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99506 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug c++/99505] ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug c++/99505] ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Keywor

[Bug tree-optimization/99510] New: [11 Regression] Compile time hog in build_aligned_type since r11-7123-g63538886d1f7fc7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99510 Bug ID: 99510 Summary: [11 Regression] Compile time hog in build_aligned_type since r11-7123-g63538886d1f7fc7c Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Ke

[Bug tree-optimization/99510] [11 Regression] Compile time hog in build_aligned_type since r11-7123-g63538886d1f7fc7c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99510 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-10 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/99513] ICE Segmentation fault when decltype lambda in concept template list since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99513 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/99517] __builtin_convertvector with casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99517 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Heh, one another ICF issue. I thought we already fixed all of them :)

[Bug target/99531] [9/10/11 Regression] Performance regression since gcc 9 (argument passing / register allocation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99531 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/99545] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug fortran/99545] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99545] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment since r11-6253-gce8dcc9105cbd404

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/99549] Segfault when scalar argument of elemental function is both derived type with allocatable component and a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96495] [gfortran] Composition of user-defined operators does not copy ALLOCATABLE property of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96495 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||here.is.a.gcc.bug at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug debug/99562] New: Invalid debug info: objdump: Warning: Location list starting at offset 0x9c3 is not terminated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99562 Bug ID: 99562 Summary: Invalid debug info: objdump: Warning: Location list starting at offset 0x9c3 is not terminated. Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/99562] Invalid debug info: objdump: Warning: Location list starting at offset 0x9c3 is not terminated.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99562 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/99585] ICE with SIZE intrinsic on nested derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug debug/99606] New: [10/11 Regression] ld.bfd: DWARF error: could not find abbrev number 64 since r10-7521-g54af95767e887d63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99606 Bug ID: 99606 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ld.bfd: DWARF error: could not find abbrev number 64 since r10-7521-g54af95767e887d63 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFI

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >