https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92685
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91574
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Using latest GCC master, I can't build gcc-9 branch with it. It's very likely
caused by switch to -fno-common:
$ g++ -no-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92711
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
One particular change that has happened in the GCC 10 devel cycle is that we
started using TOP N counters for indirect calls and value profiling. Right now,
we track 4 key:value pairs for each counter plus one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92711
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> With GCC9 like inliner parameters I get 308MB binary, so it is still
> somehwat bigger.
>
> Honza
I would try to set:
#define GCOV_TOPN_VALUES 1
then you should se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 92725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89280 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92379
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Any update about this Segher?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92286
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2019-12-01
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Let me fix it.
||2019-12-01
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92744
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2019-12-01
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please point to LNT number where you see it?
||2019-12-01
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Blocks||26163
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0
||2019-12-01
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
One of the big changes that caused that:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=21.264.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 91222, which changed state.
Bug 91222 Summary: [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in
warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, I've just updated LNT filter, and one can see it better with:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/spec_report/branch?sorting=gcc-9%2Cgcc-trunk&all_elf_detail_stats=on
I'm going to bisect the WRF s
||2019-12-02
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
I can work on that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > So wrf grew starting with r271377, size (w/o debug info) goes from 20164464B
> > to 23674792.
>
> Also check the build time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47403
--> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92749
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-12-2
CC|
: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I've just isolated following code snippet from tar package:
$ cat buf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92765
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
||2019-12-03
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, it's at least as old as GCC 4.8.0.
||2019-12-03
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
Summary|ICE in |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92764
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2)
> Not a [10 Regression], then, although I could not reproduce it w/ 8.2.0.
8.2.0 fails as well for me.
||2019-12-03
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||8.3.0
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
Ever confirmed
||2019-12-03
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever
||2019-12-03
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r218068, it
||2019-12-03
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2019-12-03
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||8.3.0
Summary|ICE in gfc_trans_call, at |[9/10 Regression] ICE
: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I have a test-case from graphene package that started to fail with r273194:
$ cat matrix.c
#include
#define GRAPHENE_ALIGN16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
clang seems to be happy with -ffast-math:
$ clang -O2 matrix.c -ffast-math && ./a.out
matrix.c:17:63: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'int const[4]' to
parameter of type 'const float *' [-Wincomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
||2019-12-04
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: i586-linux-gnu
Target: i586-linux-gnu
Created attachment 47414
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2019-12-04
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r242037
||2019-12-04
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever
||2019-12-04
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started to ICE with r257827, before
gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92794
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92794
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92743
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ds: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
I see the following ICE reduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92803
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47421
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47421&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92803
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47420
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47420&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92803
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 5 09:08:44 2019
New Revision: 278990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix profile name files without -fprofile-dir.
2019-12-05 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
One can see that here:
https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92816
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92816
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
-march=skylake seems unaffected:
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=227.70.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92809
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
||2019-12-05
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Let me fix it. Thanks for the report.
||2019-12-05
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I can take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92817
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
>
> as it is, the builtin-in prototype does not match what one would define in
> source code and this trips up type based control-flow integrity checks.
You are right, it's wrong. Can you please explain to m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92817
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 5 12:35:26 2019
New Revision: 278995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix __gcov_exit fn prototype.
2019-12-05 Martin Liska
PR gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92817
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92737
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Dec 9 09:00:42 2019
New Revision: 279109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279109&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Come up with constructors of symtab_node, cgraph_node and varpool_node.
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92737
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92864
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE:
$ cat ice.ii
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: crazylht at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE:
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92865
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92865
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|unknown |10.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
> >
> &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92388
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Any update on this Kyril?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
I have a reduced test-case, but thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 92832, which changed state.
Bug 92832 Summary: valgrind error in incorporate_penalties
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832
What|Removed |Added
||2019-12-09
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2019-12-09
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r277655, it was rejected
: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92882
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92410
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92862
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Dec 10 08:36:56 2019
New Revision: 279156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix typos in 2 functions.
2019-12-10 Martin Liska
PR tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92862
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2019-12-10
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
||2019-12-10
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r231081. It
||2019-12-10
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, I've got a patch for that.
||2019-12-10
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, it's very old issue.
||2019-12-10
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||kcy at codesourcery dot com,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> > Workaround: use release checking.
>
> Stupid question: How do I do that? Is there a switch that can b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
||2019-12-10
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||6.5.0
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
Summary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 47459
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47459&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92874
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Dec 10 18:57:30 2019
New Revision: 279181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Bail out in gfc_dep_compare_expr for a NULL argument.
2019-12-10 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92874
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2019-12-11
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||9.2.0
Target Milestone|--- |9.3
Ever confirmed
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
1601 - 1700 of 11718 matches
Mail list logo