[Bug ipa/92685] In IPA's execute stage create_version_clone_with_body fails with non-vNULL callers

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92685 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/91574] [10 Regression] ICE in types_same_for_odr at gcc/ipa-devirt.c:355 since r272037

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91574 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/92724] New: Can't link 9.2.0 ada with latest GCC

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Using latest GCC master, I can't build gcc-9 branch with it. It's very likely caused by switch to -fno-common: $ g++ -no-

[Bug tree-optimization/92711] GCC 10 libxul.so -fprofile-generate binary is 360MB while clang needs only 163MB.

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92711 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- One particular change that has happened in the GCC 10 devel cycle is that we started using TOP N counters for indirect calls and value profiling. Right now, we track 4 key:value pairs for each counter plus one

[Bug tree-optimization/92711] GCC 10 libxul.so -fprofile-generate binary is 360MB while clang needs only 163MB.

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92711 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) > With GCC9 like inliner parameters I get 308MB binary, so it is still > somehwat bigger. > > Honza I would try to set: #define GCOV_TOPN_VALUES 1 then you should se

[Bug tree-optimization/89280] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in is_gimple_reg_type)

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89280 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 92725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/92725] ICE: Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89280 ***

[Bug target/92379] rs6000.c:5598:13: runtime error: shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long int'

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92379 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Any update about this Segher?

[Bug c/92286] Possible improvement for -Wduplicated-cond warning

2019-11-29 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92286 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92743] doc: -Wattribute-alias improperly indexed

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-01 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Let me fix it.

[Bug tree-optimization/92742] [10 Regression] ICE in info_for_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4367

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-01 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug target/92744] New: [10 Regression] error: insn does not satisfy its constraints since r278439

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu I

[Bug target/92744] [10 Regression] error: insn does not satisfy its constraints since r278439

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92744 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/92740] induct2 (from polyhedron) regresses 267% with -O2 -ftree-vectorize -ftree-slp-vectorize -fvect-cost-modes=dynamic compared to -O2

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-01 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Can you please point to LNT number where you see it?

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-01 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Blocks||26163 Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/92741] [10 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: invalid vector types in nop conversion)

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-01 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

2019-12-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- One of the big changes that caused that: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=21.264.4

[Bug c++/91222] [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 91222, which changed state. Bug 91222 Summary: [10 Regression] 507.cactuBSSN_r build fails in warn_types_mismatch at ipa-devirt.c:1006 since r273571 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91222 What|

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Ok, I've just updated LNT filter, and one can see it better with: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/spec_report/branch?sorting=gcc-9%2Cgcc-trunk&all_elf_detail_stats=on I'm going to bisect the WRF s

[Bug ipa/92737] cgraph_node and varpool_node needs explicit constructor

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-02 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I can work on that.

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > So wrf grew starting with r271377, size (w/o debug info) goes from 20164464B > > to 23674792. > > Also check the build time

[Bug c/92326] wrong bound in zero-length array diagnostics

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92326 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/92749] New: warning: inlining failed in call to ‘salsa20’: --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached after r276516

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 47403 --> https://gcc.gnu.

[Bug ipa/92749] warning: inlining failed in call to ‘salsa20’: --param max-inline-insns-single limit reached after r276516

2019-12-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92749 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2019-12-2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/92765] New: [10 Regression] Wrong code caused by folding of -Wstring-compare since r276773

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I've just isolated following code snippet from tar package: $ cat buf

[Bug tree-optimization/92765] [10 Regression] Wrong code caused by folding of -Wstring-compare since r276773

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92765 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/92764] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_procedure_use

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, it's at least as old as GCC 4.8.0.

[Bug debug/92763] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_abstract_function, at dwarf2out.c:22659, or in force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:26224

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |8.4 Summary|ICE in |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE

[Bug fortran/92764] ICE in gfc_procedure_use

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92764 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2) > Not a [10 Regression], then, although I could not reproduce it w/ 8.2.0. 8.2.0 fails as well for me.

[Bug fortran/92756] [9/10 Regression] ICE in lower_omp, at omp-low.c:12988

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||8.3.0 Target Milestone|--- |8.4 Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/92755] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2123

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever

[Bug fortran/92754] ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:693

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, started with r218068, it

[Bug c/92748] Two different -Wreturn-type diagnostics for essentially same code

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug fortran/92753] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_call, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:392

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-03 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||8.3.0 Summary|ICE in gfc_trans_call, at |[9/10 Regression] ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/92768] New: Maybe a wrong code for vector constants

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I have a test-case from graphene package that started to fail with r273194: $ cat matrix.c #include #define GRAPHENE_ALIGN16

[Bug tree-optimization/92768] Maybe a wrong code for vector constants

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- clang seems to be happy with -ffast-math: $ clang -O2 matrix.c -ffast-math && ./a.out matrix.c:17:63: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'int const[4]' to parameter of type 'const float *' [-Wincomp

[Bug tree-optimization/92768] [8/9/10 Regression] Maybe a wrong code for vector constants

2019-12-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92768 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/92788] [10 Regression] ICE in redirect_eh_edge_1, at tree-eh.c:2313

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-04 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug target/92791] New: [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: i586-linux-gnu Target: i586-linux-gnu Created attachment 47414

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92782] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2431

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-04 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, started with r242037

[Bug fortran/92780] [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_class_from_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:484

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-04 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever

[Bug fortran/92779] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_funcall, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4225

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-04 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Started to ICE with r257827, before

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/92794] [10 Regression] ICE in decide_about_value, at ipa-cp.c:5186

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92794 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|UNCONF

[Bug ipa/92794] [10 Regression] ICE in decide_about_value, at ipa-cp.c:5186

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92794 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug c++/92743] doc: -Wattribute-alias improperly indexed

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92743 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92803] New: [10 Regression] error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr' since r278764

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
ds: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu I see the following ICE reduce

[Bug tree-optimization/92803] [10 Regression] error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr' since r278764

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92803 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 47421 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47421&action=edit test-case

[Bug tree-optimization/92803] [10 Regression] error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr' since r278764

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92803 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 47420 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47420&action=edit test-case

[Bug tree-optimization/92803] [10 Regression] error: type mismatch in 'vec_perm_expr' since r278764

2019-12-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92803 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Dec 5 09:08:44 2019 New Revision: 278990 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278990&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix profile name files without -fprofile-dir. 2019-12-05 Martin Liska

[Bug gcov-profile/91971] Profile directory concatenated with object file path

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91971 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/92816] New: [10 Regression] 35% performance drop for 433.milc with -O2 -flto on znver1 since r278879

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- One can see that here: https

[Bug ipa/92816] [10 Regression] 35% performance drop for 433.milc with -O2 -flto on znver1 since r278879

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92816 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92816] [10 Regression] 35% performance drop for 433.milc with -O2 -flto on znver1 since r278879

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92816 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- -march=skylake seems unaffected: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=227.70.0

[Bug ipa/92809] [10 regression] error: calls_comdat_local is set outside of a comdat group

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92809 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/92817] the prototype of the built-in __gcov_exit function is wrong

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-05 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Let me fix it. Thanks for the report.

[Bug ipa/92799] ICE: in get, at cgraph.h:1339

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-05 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- I can take a look.

[Bug gcov-profile/92817] the prototype of the built-in __gcov_exit function is wrong

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92817 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > > as it is, the builtin-in prototype does not match what one would define in > source code and this trips up type based control-flow integrity checks. You are right, it's wrong. Can you please explain to m

[Bug gcov-profile/92817] the prototype of the built-in __gcov_exit function is wrong

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92817 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Dec 5 12:35:26 2019 New Revision: 278995 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=278995&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix __gcov_exit fn prototype. 2019-12-05 Martin Liska PR gcov

[Bug gcov-profile/92817] the prototype of the built-in __gcov_exit function is wrong

2019-12-05 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92817 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/92737] cgraph_node and varpool_node needs explicit constructor

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92737 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Dec 9 09:00:42 2019 New Revision: 279109 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279109&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Come up with constructors of symtab_node, cgraph_node and varpool_node. 2

[Bug ipa/92832] valgrind error in incorporate_penalties

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/92737] cgraph_node and varpool_node needs explicit constructor

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92737 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92864] [10 Regression] ICE in is_really_empty_class at gcc/cp/class.c:8595 since r276563

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92864 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92864] New: [10 Regression] ICE in is_really_empty_class at gcc/cp/class.c:8595 since r276563

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I see the following ICE: $ cat ice.ii

[Bug target/92865] New: [10 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 since

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org CC: crazylht at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I see the following ICE: $ cat

[Bug target/92865] [10 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 since

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92865 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/92865] [10 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 since r279107

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92865 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/92862] Suspicious codes in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c and predict.c

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Version|unknown |10.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- > > > &

[Bug ipa/92832] valgrind error in incorporate_penalties

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91154] [10 Regression] 456.hmmer regression on Haswell caused by r272922

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91154 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/92388] [10 Regression] ICE in insert_regs, at cse.c:1129

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92388 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Any update on this Kyril?

[Bug ipa/92832] valgrind error in incorporate_penalties

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- I have a reduced test-case, but thanks.

[Bug ipa/92832] valgrind error in incorporate_penalties

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 92832, which changed state. Bug 92832 Summary: valgrind error in incorporate_penalties https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92832 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/92868] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have ssa_name in to_wide, at tree.h:5855

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-09 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug c++/92838] ICE (internal compiler error) calling lambda object with requires clause (in in dependent_type_p)

2019-12-09 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-09 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Started with r277655, it was rejected

[Bug rtl-optimization/92882] New: [10 Regression] ICE in regstat_bb_compute_calls_crossed, at regstat.c:327 since r279124

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug rtl-optimization/92882] [10 Regression] ICE in regstat_bb_compute_calls_crossed, at regstat.c:327 since r279124

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92882 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/92410] Invalid access to df->insns[] in regstat_bb_compute_calls_crossed (caught by hwasan)

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92410 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92862] Suspicious codes in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c and predict.c

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92862 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Dec 10 08:36:56 2019 New Revision: 279156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279156&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix typos in 2 functions. 2019-12-10 Martin Liska PR tree-opt

[Bug tree-optimization/92862] Suspicious codes in tree-ssa-loop-niter.c and predict.c

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92862 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/92879] [10 Regression] incorrect warning of __builtin_memset offset is out of the bounds on zero-size allocation and initialization

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-10 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug middle-end/92876] ICE in expand_UNIQUE, at internal-fn.c:2599

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-10 CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, started with r231081. It

[Bug fortran/92874] ICE in gfc_dep_compare_expr, at fortran/dependency.c:36

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-10 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, I've got a patch for that.

[Bug fortran/92873] ICE in unmodified_parm_or_parm_agg_item, at ipa-fnsummary.c:1166

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-10 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Confirmed, it's very old issue.

[Bug fortran/92872] [10 Regression] ICE in build_fold_indirect_ref_loc, at fold-const.c:14842

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-10 CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, ||kcy at codesourcery dot com, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5) > (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4) > > Workaround: use release checking. > > Stupid question: How do I do that? Is there a switch that can b

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/92885] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE (segfault) with allocatable coarrays

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-10 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||6.5.0 Target Milestone|--- |8.4 Summary

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --

[Bug rtl-optimization/90282] internal compiler error: qsort checking failed in snapshot-20190429

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90282 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 47459 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47459&action=edit test-case

[Bug fortran/92874] ICE in gfc_dep_compare_expr, at fortran/dependency.c:36

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92874 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Dec 10 18:57:30 2019 New Revision: 279181 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279181&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Bail out in gfc_dep_compare_expr for a NULL argument. 2019-12-10 Martin

[Bug fortran/92874] ICE in gfc_dep_compare_expr, at fortran/dependency.c:36

2019-12-10 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92874 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92897] [9/10 Regression] [Coarray] ICE in gfc_set_array_spec, at fortran/array.c:864

2019-12-11 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||2019-12-11 CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org, ||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||9.2.0 Target Milestone|--- |9.3 Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/92898] [9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_is_contiguous, at fortran/check.c:7157

2019-12-11 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

<    12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   >