https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> Also this one shows the problem: -fdbg-cnt=ipa_cp_bits:10460-10461.
>
> If I see correctly the function body:
> lto-dump -dump-body=addr_to_index nir_lower_io.c.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Also this one shows the problem: -fdbg-cnt=ipa_cp_bits:10460-10461.
If I see correctly the function body:
lto-dump -dump-body=addr_to_index nir_lower_io.c.o
Gimple Body of Function: addr_to_index
addr_to_inde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
But streamed IPA CP info tells that:
Node: addr_to_offset/632014:
param [0]: VARIABLE
ctxs: VARIABLE
Bits: value = 0x0, mask = 0xfff8
int VARYING
AGGS VAR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
It's likely correctly propagated, right now it looks the source code is
invalid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96559
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96535
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> I did not have the real statistics yet as our company is not yet moved to
> gcc9 (maybe end of this year ).
>
> and even the size of the compressed file is smaller , but we have to unzip
> and parse it , ri
oduct: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: cmang at google dot com, ian at airs dot com
Target
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following issue:
[ 269s] ../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++17/fs_ops.cc: In function
'std::filesystem::path std::files
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96568
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49041
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49041&action=edit
Build log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> But streamed IPA CP info tells that:
>
> Node: addr_to_offset/632014:
> param [0]: VARIABLE
> ctxs: VARIABLE
> Bits: value = 0x0, mask =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
So in ltrans we end up with:
addr_to_index (struct nir_builder * b, struct nir_ssa_def * addr,
nir_address_format addr_format)
{
unsigned int num_channels;
unsigned int swizzle[16];
unsigned int i;
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Honza, can you please take a look? There's a bug in how get_default_value how
nonzero bits are combined with ipcp_get_parm_bits. I can work on that
tomorrow..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96578
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Last reconfirmed|
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: crazylht at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I see the following ICE:
$ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr96370.c
-fno-tree-forwprop -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-vrp -O3
during GIMPLE pass: reassoc
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr96370
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate, let's see if it's a correct one.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96578
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Leaving to Kugan.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|slyfox at inbox dot ru |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96291
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you for the patch.
|WAITING
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please attached pre-processed source file?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška
,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with the revision that added -fconcepts-ts
r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started to ICE with r7-2847-gba9bbd6f584afe29.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||mpolacek at
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords||missed-optimization
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Nice trick!
Generally speaking about the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
@seurer: Please add author of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
*thanks for reminder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
Bug 45375 depends on bug 96058, which changed state.
Bug 96058 Summary: ICE in c_getstr at gcc/fold-const.c:15475
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96058
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96548
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Richi is on vacation. I'm pretty sure he'll quick it as soon as he gets back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96698
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #3)
> Ah, thanks for the pointer.
>
> I thought I had used -O0 in the larger project as well, but I hadn't.
>
> Just as a suggestion, would it make sense to apply the c
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Let me take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96633
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #2)
> Martin added me to CC so I assume he wants me to chime in.
Yes, you understood very well and thanks for the reply.
...
> With that out of the way: striving
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96752
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: kito at gcc dot gnu.org, wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux-gnu
Target: riscv64-linux-gnu
|with `-g -O3` |x86_64-linux-gnu with `-g
||-O3` since
||r11-39-gf9e1ea10e657af9f
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
) |verify_sra_access_forest,
||at tree-sra.c:2352) since
||r10-6320-g5b9e89c922dc2e7e
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96732
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Started with r11-2748
Can you please CC author of the revision that caused that? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94938
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andysem at mail dot ru
--- Comment #9 fro
|RESOLVED
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 94938 ***
||9.3.0
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96748
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r9-5763
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96750
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > after:
> > 1794240.0
> >
> > before:
> > 1802710.0
>
> That's less than 1% of difference (with "after" better than "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96734
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Ariadne Conill from comment #3)
> When that method.ii is compiled against g++ 9.3.0 with the provided options,
> it compiles successfully.
>
> When built using a cross-compiled g++ 10.2.0, it cra
|optimization in nested |optimization in nested
|loops with -O2 |loops with -O2 since
||r11-2574-g6aec53ee4f75a64c
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As seen
here:https://gist.githubusercontent.com/marxin/223890df4d8d8e490b6b2918b77dacad/raw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96794
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96794
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > As seen
> > here:https://gist.githubusercontent.com/marxin/223890df4d8d8e490b6b2918b77dacad/raw/7e0363da60dcddbfde4ab68fa3be755515166297/gcc-10-with-zstd.svg
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96794
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> > For jobserver they are still running even though they sleep.
> Aha, so it is extra locking mechanizm we add without jobserver
> knowledge.
It's unrelated to jobserver, one can enable it with configure opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96794
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
There's graph when omitting link mutex:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/marxin/223890df4d8d8e490b6b2918b77dacad/raw/24409fcf099230dbc19ef50e193655c578d6d527/gcc-10-without-mutex-lock.svg
As seen, memory pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96806
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96805
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96813
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Is there any progress about this PR? It's still blocking Ada bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> > Is there any progress about this PR? It's still blocking Ada bootstrap.
>
> Can you check the patch from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96825
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
|1
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-28
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Fails due to:
#1 0x00e6602c in verify_sra_access_forest (root=0x262cc80) at
/home/marxin/Programming
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96820
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Where first bad value is 1840700270.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Looking at the ICE, we actually ICE at the place where a fake comparison is
constructed:
if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (tcode) != tcc_comparison)
{
gcc_assert (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0)));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> As said you have to fake "regular" non-bool comparison operands,
> best based on the COND_EXPRs operand types (using integer types
> of the same size)
All right, do you mean something like what we do in
tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96856
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host
|NEW
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96885
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96886
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96893
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96893
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57703
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Mine.
||2020-09-21
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Let me take it.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Fails likely since r11-3196-g05f40bc4c116ba48843728201bc7290a5e518598 due to:
libcommon.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libbacktrace/.libs
: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 26163
Target Milestone: ---
Since r11-3068-gfb51be60c8e7b697 the SPEC 2006
1101 - 1200 of 11718 matches
Mail list logo
