--- Comment #7 from martsummsw at hotmail dot com 2006-08-27 06:37 ---
I am the reporter of this bug (with a new email-adress)
This problem seems to be solved with 4.1.1 =)
(Consider only #5 and forward - the first is wrong/irrelevant)
--
martsummsw at hotmail dot com changed
--- Comment #9 from martsummsw at hotmail dot com 2006-08-27 13:21 ---
Hmmm - I am (also) wrong when I claimed it was solved in 4.1.1. It is improved
since the example that goes wrong in #5 now is right, but it is just
the limit (for when the compiler gets comfused) that is pushed a
--- Comment #11 from martsummsw at hotmail dot com 2006-08-27 19:33 ---
You are right =)
I recall I did play with some params in 3.4, but without result but I did
not in 4.0 - since I did not expect a so (in my head) fairly low number to be
"large" ...
It would be re
CONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: martsummsw at hotmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23793
--- Additional Comments From martsummsw at hotmail dot com 2005-09-10
04:58 ---
First of all - Thank you.
And I promise never to report an error against such an old version.
Second I however think I am happy to haven reported it since nobody on
comp.lang.c++ knew . I found nothing
