[Bug c++/91317] New: [7/8/9/10 Regression] false-positive maybe-uninitialized warning in destructor with placement new

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: martindorey at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Sorry if this is already raised somewhere. I did try to search various ways

[Bug c++/91317] [7/8/9/10 Regression] false-positive maybe-uninitialized warning in destructor with placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91317 Martin Dorey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/79009] Missing 'inconsistent deduction for ‘auto’' error when having a dependent initializer and a nondependent one in the same declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79009 Martin Dorey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martindorey at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/59960] accepts ill-formed 'auto a1 = t1, a2 = t2;' where t1 and t2 have different template types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59960 Martin Dorey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martindorey at gmail dot com --- Comment