[Bug c/50675] New: master and single OpenMP constructs broken

2011-10-09 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 Bug #: 50675 Summary: master and single OpenMP constructs broken Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/50675] master and single OpenMP constructs broken

2011-10-09 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 --- Comment #2 from markflorisson88 2011-10-09 13:46:27 UTC --- Indeed, you are right. My apologies, I should teach myself to use default(none).

[Bug c/49897] New: nesting lastprivate gives incorrect result

2011-07-29 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897 Summary: nesting lastprivate gives incorrect result Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug c/49898] New: nested reduction on #pragma omp for gives incorrect result

2011-07-29 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49898 Summary: nested reduction on #pragma omp for gives incorrect result Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component

[Bug middle-end/49897] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] nesting lastprivate gives incorrect result

2011-07-29 Thread markflorisson88 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49897 --- Comment #4 from markflorisson88 2011-07-29 16:05:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 24865 [details] > gcc47-pr49897.patch > > Fix. Wow, thanks a lot for the quick fix!