http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
Bug #: 53386
Summary: Bad assembly code produced for m68000
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
Luis Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|4.6.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
--- Comment #3 from Luis Alves 2012-05-17 10:19:11
UTC ---
Thanks a lot Andreas,
Changed those flags to true and it's working good now.
Also a minor correction: I was trying to build gcc 4.6.3 (not 4.6.4).
(I've changed status to RESOLVED-INVA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
Luis Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
--- Comment #9 from Luis Alves 2012-05-17 14:29:07
UTC ---
Thanks Mikael,
But... will I have any (future) problems if I just change the flags in the
?
In a small test I've made that solutions seems to produce good code for the
68000 but I'm af
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
--- Comment #12 from Luis Alves 2012-05-17 15:44:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> See the gcc-patches thread I referred to in #c8, gcc-4.3 also changed
> low-level
> ABI details, with the consequence that gcc-4.2 and gcc-4.3 generate
> inc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53386
--- Comment #13 from Luis Alves 2012-05-18 17:00:11
UTC ---
I've built gcc with the m68k/linux.h patched for the 68000 but it's not working
as expected.
As test I've used linux kernel 3.3
Results are compared to the use of gcc-4.2.4 vs gcc-4.6.
