[Bug c++/53503] New: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 Bug #: 53503 Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 --- Comment #5 from Ling Li 2012-05-28 12:37:44 UTC --- Thanks much for the super quick fix.

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53584 Bug #: 53584 Summary: [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] deleted function unique_ptr::operator=(const unique_ptr &) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53584 --- Comment #2 from Ling Li 2012-06-05 20:59:24 UTC --- You are right. My bad. I thought having a user-declared destructor would be different than having a user-declared constructor, and the fact that GCC 4.6 accepted the code doubled my belief