--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-30 18:50
---
Unfortunately ia64-linux is currently in very bad shape Ada-wise with 191 ACATS
FAIL in Andreas Schwab latest 4.1 run:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg01362.html
May be future fixes for the
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-01 16:04
---
Ok, no need to revert it right now. I'm trying to reduce it to something
standalone that doesn't call the Ada runtime.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-01 17:41
---
Workaround patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00930.html
Rest of discussion here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00016.html
Seems to be a gnatbind bug present on 4.0 and 4.1
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-02 16:20 ---
It looks like it is indeed a codegen bug in s-arit64.adb, in Scaled_Divide the
following line is miscompiled at -O1 and above (works at -O0):
T2 := Lo (T1 rem Zlo) & D (4);
In my p.adb testcase,
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-02 17:52 ---
Same message on mainline, however I'm not able to say wether it's a bug or not.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-03 03:37 ---
I confirm that on p.adb no-tree-ter does make the problem disappear, p.adb
works when I compile s-arit64 as follows:
gcc -c -O2 -gnatpg -fno-tree-ter s-arit64.adb
(I'll be away from email until wedn
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-05 17:55 ---
Also fixed in 4.1.0 20051001 (experimental).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24212
--- Comment #15 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-05 20:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=9897)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9897&action=view)
-fdump-rtl-expand-details
s-arit64.adb.00.expand-normal : -O2 -gnatpg
s-arit64.adb.00.expand-no-tree-te
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-06 06:16 ---
Patch was not commited
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-06 06:16 ---
Patch was not commited
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24290
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-12 19:29 ---
Ada not release critical.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone
--- Comment #17 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-12 19:33 ---
Ada not release critical.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-12 19:47 ---
Fixed on 4.0.x according to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00450.html
Also on 4.1 (when 4.1 bootstraps Ada):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00983.html
--
laurent at guerby dot
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-12 20:00 ---
Reopen for 4.1/4.2 as 4.0 Regression.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-12 20:01 ---
Time to sleep...
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0
--- Comment #7 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 04:43 ---
Still fails on 4.1 at -O0 on x86 and x86_64-linux:
/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20051012T220927/gcc/xgcc -c
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build-20051012T220927/gcc/ -gnatws -O0
-I/home/guerby/work/gcc/build/build
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 04:50 ---
Fixed as of gcc version 4.1.0 20051012 (experimental) on x86-linux and
x86_64-linux.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18858
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 04:59 ---
Fixed in 4.0.2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-10/msg00324.html
Fixed in 4.1 (when it last bootstraped):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-04/msg00409.html
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed
--- Comment #7 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 05:09 ---
Note: works at -O0 on x86-linux and x86_64-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22333
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 05:10 ---
Note: works at -O0 on x86-linux and x86_64-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22561
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 07:22 ---
Fixed on 4.0.2 and fixed on 4.1
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 18:48 ---
Fixed on x86 and x86_64-linux as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 13 05:13:16 UTC 2005
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC host
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-17 19:59 ---
Also fails on ia64-linux as of 20051017
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22561
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-17 20:00 ---
Also fail on ia64-linux as of 20051017:
,.,. C940013 ACATS 2.5 05-10-17 13:06:13
C940013 Check that queues on protected entries are handled FIFO and
that 'count is correct.
* C940013 Unexp
1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
GCC host triplet: ia64-suse-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-17 20:15 ---
Also fails on ia64-linux as of 20051017.
,.,. C940013 ACATS 2.5 05-10-17 13:06:13
C940013 Check that queues on protected entries are handled FIFO and
that 'count is correct.
* C940013 Unexp
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-22 09:08 ---
I confirm that 4.0.2 and 4.1.0 20051021 (experimental) show the same error:
$ gcc -c levelx.adb
levelx.adb:25:51: no visible subprogram matches the specification for
"Any_Image3"
levelx.adb:26:51: no visible
--- Comment #18 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-24 19:37 ---
Still seeing the failures on SuSE 9.3 i686 machine with
"-enable-languages=ada,c --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls
--enable-threads=posix --disable-multilib" --enable-checking as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Oct 2
--- Comment #20 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-24 21:31 ---
Jan Hubicka told me on IRC that Jakub Jelinek is working on PR23775 which might
be related (or the same issue) as this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003
--- Comment #16 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-03 08:47 ---
Started passing on x86-linux but still failing on x86_64 as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Nov 2 22:35:36 UTC 2005 (revision 106403)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-03 15:42 ---
Confirmed on 4.0.2 and trunk.
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.0.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3850|
| Error detected at
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-03 15:49 ---
I'm testing the patch aginst trunk, is it okay for 4.1 or should we wait after
the branch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23427
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-11-03 22:14 ---
Fixed
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
urent at guerby dot net
GCC build triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC host triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43096
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-16 17:43 ---
Might be related to the same patch on powerpc-linux two different ACATS started
FAILing around the same time:
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 29 08:20:22 UTC 2010 (revision 156342)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-01
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-17 11:57 ---
For reference c87b39a on powerpc-linux:
^M
,.,. C87B39A ACATS 2.5 10-02-17 00:06:47^M
C87B39A OVERLOADING RESOLUTION FOR ALLOCATORS.^M
^M
raised CONSTRAINT_ERROR : c87b39a.adb:93 discriminant check failed^M
Still
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-19 12:17 ---
Note: c87b39a also fails on sparc-linux 32 bits but not 64 bits
sparc http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg01785.html
sparc64 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg01689.html
--
http
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-02-28 09:05 ---
Fixed on arm-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg02695.html
powerpc-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg02720.html
Thanks!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-03-15 17:36 ---
As Matthias said this is a --with-mode=thumb issue, people not using this
option have no issue bootstraping natively on arm:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-03/msg01254.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-03-20 19:26 ---
I haven't built 4.3 in a while, if this is fixed in 4.4 and 4.5 it's good
enough for me so feel free to close as WONTFIX for 4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38696
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-03-21 19:56 ---
Summary work/fail.
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-21 18:02
---
PASS on x86 and x86_64-linux as of
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jun 21 11:01:31 UTC 2005
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22033
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-21 20:10
---
Kazu, your patch does fix the problem, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg01293.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22026
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-21 21:06
---
Still an infinite loop on bootstrap as of LAST_UPDATED Tue Jun 21 20:10:50 UTC
2005
stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/
-B/home/guerby/work/gcc/install/install-20050621T221553/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-c -g -O2
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,rakdver at atrey dot
karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22212
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-28 10:43
---
Also an ivopt SEGV during gnattools:
../../xgcc -c -I./ -I../rts -I. -I/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/ada
-B../../ -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I-
/home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/ada/vms_conv.adb
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-29 06:13
---
Disabling wrapv also enables a successfull Ada bootstrap.
Index: misc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/ada/misc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.104
diff
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-30 21:04
---
For the record, after twenty hours of compilation on an Athlon 64 3000+
(x86_64-linux), a build with --enable-checking=all,gcac,fold,rtl detects
something wrong in fold. I'm attaching the .i.
LAST_UPDATE
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-30 23:04
---
Hmm, unless I made a mistake the strfix problem is indeed fixed, but
gcc/ada/vms_conv.adb one is still there.
LAST_UPDATED Thu Jun 30 21:09:27 UTC 2005 + Zdenek patch.
../../xgcc -c -I./ -I../rts -I. -I/home
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22277
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-02 13:08
---
cxa4006 and cxa4017 fail the same way (STORAGE_ERROR) as vms_conv.adb.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22212
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-05 08:26
---
Still failing as of 4.0.1 RC3 (20050702)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg00183.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19382
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-06 12:20
---
It has also been reported on ia64-linux by Geert.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-07/msg00209.html
bt on my x86_64-linux machine
#0 internal_error (gmsgid=0xb4e6c0 "tree check: %s, have %s in %s, at
--
Summary: ACAT
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-06 22:51
---
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.1.0 20050706 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: |
| in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:376
org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22333
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-07 11:02
---
Between:
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 2 09:40:45 UTC 2005
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Jul 6 23:57:55 UTC 2005
c52011a cd2b11a cd2b11b started passing instead of ICEing.
c32001e c64105b c95086b are still ICEing in
--
Bug 22334 depends on bug 22332, which changed state.
Bug 22332 Summary: [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE c34005f c34005i c34005l c34005o
calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:376
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22332
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-09 22:59
---
Fixed as of LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 9 20:48:09 UTC 2005
Thanks!
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-10 19:07
---
The following patch suggested by Richard Kenner messages "fixes" the bootstrap
problem.
Index: function.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/g
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-12 08:26
---
Fixed between:
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 9 23:06:33 UTC 2005
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Jul 11 22:29:49 UTC 2005
on x86-linux and x86_64-linux (don't know what patch though).
--
What|Re
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22561
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-19 19:02
---
FAIL the same way on x86-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22561
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-23 18:01
---
FYI I successfully bootstraped on x86_64-linux with Andrew's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-07/msg01241.html
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 23 10:44:53 UTC 2005
I'm updating and reboostrapi
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-23 18:02
---
Silly me, it's part of Andrew's patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22631
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-23 19:16
---
Bootstraped completed on x86_64-linux for
LAST_UPDATED Sat Jul 23 17:57:57 UTC 2005
with Andrew's patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22631
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-24 10:11
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Bootstraped completed on x86_64-linux for
> > LAST_UPDATED Sat Jul 23 17:57:57 UTC 2005
> > with Andrew's patch.
>
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-07-24 10:12
---
Created an attachment (id=9341)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9341&action=view)
Current diff
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22631
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23141
code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-10 10:29
---
Forgot the list:
a54b02a c32001a c34001a c34001c c34001d
c34001f c34011b c35003a c35003b c35502b
c35502p c35508a c35508b c35508e c35508g
c35508l c35508o c35508p c36104b c37005a
c43215a c43215b c433001 c45242b
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-10 10:29
---
cc3601a cxacb01
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23312
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-10 17:35
---
On 4.0 x86 and x86_64, we also have the 32 4.1 ICE:
a54b02a c32001a c34001a c34001c c34001d
c34001f c34011b c35003a c35003b c35502b
c35502p c35508a c35508b c35508e c35508g
c35508l c35508o c35508p c36104a
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-10 21:22
---
Confirmed on 4.1.0 20050809 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu).
4.0.x gives an error so I assume ICE on invalid for now.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/b23319> gcc -c -gnat05 test.adb
pkg.ads:4:25: expecting gene
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-16 19:12
---
Even the following code doesn't trigger anything on x86-linux mainline, so I
assume the line in trans.c is unreachable. Richard Kenner might confirm here.
procedure PP is
subtype T is String (1 ..
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-19 22:43
---
Still there as of 20050819
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-08/msg00538.html
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.1.0 20050819 (experimental) (powerpc-apple
cc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-22 20:01
---
With 4.1.0 20050822 (experimental) on x86-linux, I get as output
27 times "average: 10.00" followed by three times "average:error here!"
which seems the correct behaviour since you d
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-22 20:42
---
Could you try to add before "end g;" the following line:
Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line (Boolean'Image (T'Machine_Overflows));
And report wether it prints True or False? On x86 and x86_64-linux it
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-22 20:48
---
Ok it's always better to put the context in bugzilla, I don't read comp.lang.ada
regularly anymore these days :).
I haven't seen reports of mingw Ada 4.1 testing on [EMAIL PROTECTED],
could some
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23565
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-25 18:09
---
As of LAST_UPDATED: Thu Aug 25 10:17:37 UTC 2005
this test now pass on x86_64-linux.
Could people test on hppa and powerpc?
(I removed the target milestone since Ada is not release critical anyway
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-27 12:20
---
x86 backtrace for c371002.adb
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0834ec8b in get_memory_rtx (exp=, len=) at /home/guerby/work/gcc/version-head/gcc/builtins.c:1080
1080
ssigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: laurent at guerby dot net
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23593
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-08-28 11:05
---
Thanks for fixing this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-22 11:46 ---
Original FAIL message:
,.,. C9A009G ACATS 2.5 09-11-18 11:59:26
C9A009G MASTER COMPLETED BUT NOT TERMINATED.
raised STORAGE_ERROR : s-intman.adb:139 explicit raise
The following tests FAIL the exact same way
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-23 09:06 ---
hpux11 mixes its own s-osinte spec with the posix body hence the issue:
ifeq ($(strip $(filter-out hppa% hp hpux11%,$(targ))),)
s-osinte.adbhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42153
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-23 09:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=19089)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19089&action=view)
Patch for hpux11
Dave, could try this patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42153
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-11-24 20:52 ---
Confirmed and this is a regression from 4.3.
$ gcc -c timer3.adb
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.5.0 20091109 (experimental) [trunk revision 154026]
(x86_64-unknown
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-08 22:41 ---
Note: armv7l 4.4.2 also fails:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-12/msg00749.html
Discussions on the topic.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01495.html
Doug?
--
laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #27 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-27 13:37 ---
Hi,
Is the following page up to date?
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-02/msg00302.html
--
Summary: bootstrap fails on powerpc64-linux because of libgomp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
--- Comment #3 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-28 17:47 ---
"The second issue is how libgomp configure detects availability of
pthread_{attr,}_{get,set}affinity_np. It uses link test and does not pass -Wall
-Werror to compiler; thus, libgomp build fails if those function
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-12-28 17:55 ---
Yes likely a distro header bug as I said: "Now may be it's a bug in debian etch
libc headers but it would be nice to honor --disable-werror in libgomp."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42519
401 - 500 of 743 matches
Mail list logo
