[Bug libgcc/85967] New: [ARM] No unwinding support for division functions

2018-05-29 Thread la...@linux-mips.org
Component: libgcc Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: la...@linux-mips.org Target Milestone: --- __aeabi_idiv is missing unwinding info, so backtrace stops there not providing information where division by zero happened. Tested with gcc-5.4.0 and gcc-7.3.1, but given

[Bug libgcc/85967] [ARM] No unwinding support for division functions

2018-05-29 Thread la...@linux-mips.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85967 --- Comment #1 from Ladislav Michl --- Created attachment 44205 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44205&action=edit SIGFPE test case

[Bug libgcc/85967] [ARM] No unwinding support for division functions

2018-06-21 Thread la...@linux-mips.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85967 --- Comment #2 from Ladislav Michl --- *** Bug 85966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libgcc/85966] New: [ARM] No unwinding support for division functions

2018-06-21 Thread la...@linux-mips.org
: libgcc Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: la...@linux-mips.org Target Milestone: --- Status: RESOLVED Resolution: DUPLICATE __aeabi_idiv is missing unwinding info, so backtrace stops there not providing information where division by zero

[Bug c/68193] _Generic -Woverflow false alarm

2019-05-21 Thread la...@linux-mips.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193 Ladislav Michl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||la...@linux-mips.org --- Comment #6

[Bug libgcc/85967] [ARM] No unwinding support for division functions

2018-07-11 Thread la...@linux-mips.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85967 --- Comment #4 from Ladislav Michl --- I do not have a copyright assignment in place with the FSF and I'm not even author of that patch. Adhemerval Zanella did the work (thank you again) and I added him to CC List. Patch itself needs improving as