||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-14 12:36:25
UTC ---
Yes, it is a duplicate
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55268 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-20 16:17:30
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Nov 20 16:17:16 2012
New Revision: 193666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193666
Log:
PR target/55268
* i386.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2012-11-21
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-21 11:53:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55428
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||2012-11-22
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|target |c++
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.4.0, 4.5.0, 4.6.0, 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever Confirmed|1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c++
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-22 19:11:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> So it works everywhere? ;)
Well, it doesn't work for all targets providing different calling-conventions
for functions. Eg functions with regparm, std
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54895
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.4.0, 4.5.0, 4.6.0, 4.7.0, |
|4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55367
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-24 12:54:40
UTC ---
The pattern is
movl4(%esp), %eax
movl(%eax), %eax
addl-16(%eax), %eax
As here the saved this-pointer in %eax gets clobbered.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55491
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 09:18:59
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 09:18:54 2012
New Revision: 193925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193925
Log:
PR target/55171
* i386.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 09:21:23
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 09:21:17 2012
New Revision: 193926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193926
Log:
PR target/55171
* i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55428
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55445
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 09:36:49
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 09:36:41 2012
New Revision: 193928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193928
Log:
PR target/55445
* unwind-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55445
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 09:39:54
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 09:39:49 2012
New Revision: 193929
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193929
Log:
PR target/55445
* libsupc+
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 09:41:29
UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 14:17:37
UTC ---
My ok JonY has for the patch of 4.8. It is related to a fix present upstream
in mingw-w64 about snprintf-arguments for POSIX-mode. So I don't intend to
have this patch backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #21 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 15:26:36
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 15:26:29 2012
New Revision: 193934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193934
Log:
PR target/53912
* class.c (dump_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 15:27:45
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 15:27:36 2012
New Revision: 193935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193935
Log:
PR target/53912
* class.c (dump_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #23 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 15:28:54
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 15:28:48 2012
New Revision: 193936
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193936
Log:
PR target/53912
* class.c (dump_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #24 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 18:40:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 18:40:27 2012
New Revision: 193946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193946
Log:
PR target/53912
* prefix.c (looku
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #25 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 18:43:35
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 29 18:43:29 2012
New Revision: 193947
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193947
Log:
PR target/53912
* prefix.c (looku
||2012-11-29
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 21:42:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > It really won
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-29 22:05:50
UTC ---
Sorry, I build multilib using 4.7.x branch successful on linux.
I took a closer look to your build-script - what I normally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55543
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55543
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-30 16:56:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> As far as I know, mingw64 also uses SjLj, doesn't it? When creating a 64 bit
> executable with it, it runs correctly. Only the 32 bit binaries show this
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-01 05:41:18
UTC ---
I assume it is a dup of 39820. No feedback to this part in over 2 years so
closing this too.
As remark 4.5.x isn't supp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39820
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leledumbo_cool at yahoo dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #26 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 06:56:02
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 06:55:55 2012
New Revision: 194066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194066
Log:
PR target/53912
* pointer-set.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #27 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 06:56:27
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 06:56:16 2012
New Revision: 194067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194067
Log:
PR target/53912
* pointer-set.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #28 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:01:50
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:01:43 2012
New Revision: 194069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194069
Log:
PR target/53912
* tree-dump.c (du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #29 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:02:26
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:02:17 2012
New Revision: 194070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194070
Log:
PR target/53912
* tree-dump.c (du
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #30 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:04:56
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:04:50 2012
New Revision: 194071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194071
Log:
PR target/53912
* ggc-common.c (P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #31 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-03 07:05:31
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 3 07:05:26 2012
New Revision: 194072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194072
Log:
PR target/53912
* ggc-common.c (P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55587
Bug #: 55587
Summary: Testsuite test c-c++-common/asn/memcmp-1.c fails to
link on targets without libasan/libsanitizer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55587
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-04 12:10:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 28875 [details]
> gcc48-pr55587.patch
>
> Does this patch work for you? Worked for me in a quick testing (both with
> libsanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #32 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 09:53:13
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 10 09:53:08 2012
New Revision: 194348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194348
Log:
PR target/53912
* print-tree.c (p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #33 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 09:54:20
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 10 09:54:16 2012
New Revision: 194349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194349
Log:
PR target/53912
* print-tree.c (p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
--- Comment #34 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 09:57:06
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Dec 10 09:57:02 2012
New Revision: 194350
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194350
Log:
PR target/53912
* stmt.c (compute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 10:23:56
UTC ---
Can't reproduce this. This looks for me like a broken build-setup. strsignal
is part of libiberty, and getpagesize, too.
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 11:06:49
UTC ---
This testcase seems to produce for trunk, 4.7, and 4.6 the output CCDD, which
is proper as constructor of B is called by the
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 11:16:47
UTC ---
Sorry gcc version 4.4.x isn't anymore maintained. For more modern gcc
versions this issue isn't reproducable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 11:21:04
UTC ---
A question about this build-failure. Were you using posix-threading model for
4.6 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55014
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38269
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49372
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-10 18:33:50
UTC ---
This issue is most likely related to missing DLL dependencies. Please take a
look to dependency-walker (or objdump -x) and check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-18 21:35:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> It doesn't look to me that the first two hunks of the patch are needed.
Yes, that's right.
> The last hunk doesn't look like it should be considerin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 12:11:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The point of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193769 was that
> std::this_thread::sleep_for() is always available, even without
> --enab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55741
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 13:05:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > The point of http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=193769 was
> > > that
> > >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 17:45:11
UTC ---
The issue was actual caused by old binutils version. With
mingw32-binutils-2.20.1-2.fc14, which enables ld's auto-import o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55165
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-20 20:33:04
UTC ---
Well, I did my test with 2.23.50 (head) version. But most fixes were done for
2.22 AFAIR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-03 16:47:48
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:47:37 2013
New Revision: 194859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194859
Log:
2013-01-02 Rainer Emrich
PR b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-09 12:30:50
UTC ---
Created attachment 29119
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29119
Testcase for bitfield and type-packing
This first testcase checking pack-pragma for x64/x86 MS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-09 13:34:07
UTC ---
Created attachment 29121
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29121
Testcase for bitfield and structure-aligning via attribute
This testcase use aligned/align att
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-09 13:37:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 29122
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29122
Testcase for bitfield and structure field-aligning by attribute
By this testcase we validate t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-16 09:51:45
UTC ---
Created attachment 29176
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29176
Patch for using recursive copy for directories.
AFAIU we are talking about libada only here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-19 11:53:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
>
> > Don't open an new bug, don't reopen this bug. I assume you are using
> > none-trunk version of mingw-w64, are you?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-25 23:53:37
UTC ---
Issue was fixed on trunk. As far as I know should rawhide Fedora have fixed
that issue already. Nevertheless we could define the broken-vsprintf macro
based on header-version.
I
||2013-01-30
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-30 16:51:03
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:50:49 2013
New Revision: 195579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195579
Log:
PR other/54620
PR target/39064
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39064
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-30 16:51:03
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:50:49 2013
New Revision: 195579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195579
Log:
PR other/54620
PR target/39064
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-30 16:56:50
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:56:36 2013
New Revision: 195580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195580
Log:
2013-01-30 Kai Tietz
PR other/546
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39064
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-30 16:56:50
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:56:36 2013
New Revision: 195580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195580
Log:
2013-01-30 Kai Tietz
PR other/546
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-30 16:58:24
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:58:10 2013
New Revision: 195581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195581
Log:
PR other/54620
PR target/39064
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39064
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-30 16:58:22
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 30 16:58:10 2013
New Revision: 195581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195581
Log:
PR other/54620
PR target/39064
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39064
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53285
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-31 08:14:32
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 31 08:14:27 2013
New Revision: 195601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195601
Log:
Merged from trunk.
PR other/53285
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-31 08:17:47
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 31 08:17:37 2013
New Revision: 195603
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195603
Log:
PR other/54620
* sha1.c (sha1_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-31 08:18:06
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 31 08:17:58 2013
New Revision: 195604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195604
Log:
PR other/54620
* sha1.c (sha1_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-31 08:19:12
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Jan 31 08:19:03 2013
New Revision: 195605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195605
Log:
Merged from trunk
PR other/54620
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-31 08:21:48
UTC ---
backported mainline-fix for this to 4.7. Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54620
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2013-01-31 08:28:34
UTC ---
Fixed on trunk and backported to 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56186
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
As side-note: There is something pretty fishy in tree-pretty-print.c for
OBJ_TYPE_REF, too. We do here recurse endless. Simply add to command line
'-fdump-tree-original' for reproducing.
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ---
it is a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 70869 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||john.ettedgui at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
401 - 500 of 846 matches
Mail list logo
