http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39107
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-16 08:34:56
UTC ---
I will prepare today a patch, which removes the part in java's decl.c, and adds
to i386 the additional check for initialized va_list_type_node in alignment
check.
Nevertheless, I see thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-17 21:56:13
UTC ---
Patch posted with reversal of java patch and fix in i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-21 09:05:18
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Jan 21 09:05:14 2011
New Revision: 169080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169080
Log:
2011-01-21 Kai Tietz
PR bootstrap/47215
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-21 12:39:13
UTC ---
I don't see an obvious difference to my toolchain (beside I use a cygwin
cross-compiler). But such issues could be related also to used binutils
version. I am using:
$x86_64-pc-mingw32-ld.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-21 13:41:57
UTC ---
Well, I would, if I could extract .xz attachments. Could you re-attach it as
bz2?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47423
Summary: Many testsuite failures caused by missing
gxx_visibility_sj0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47423
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-25 21:07:36
UTC ---
I tested patch and it works fine.
Thank you,
Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47351
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47584
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40722
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47596
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47596
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011.02.03 18:00:56
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-03 18:00:56
UTC ---
Hmm, this issue seems to be fixed already. At least for my installation
libgcc_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47142
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-04 09:33:58
UTC ---
Could you please check if this patch solves the issue for multilib? (It treats
multilib scenario like cross for installation of dll files).
Index: config.gcc
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47142
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-04 15:54:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > My next complete building will be started at 23:50 PM(UTC), if I got
> > different
> > answer, I will inform you.
>
> OOPS, libgcc
||2011.02.05 13:42:49
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-05 13:42:49
UTC ---
Does it help on cross-compile to do after 'make all-gcc && make in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-06 15:06:58
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Sun Feb 6 15:06:56 2011
New Revision: 169863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169863
Log:
2011-02-06 Kai Tietz
PR lto/47225
* Makef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 08:20:59
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Feb 7 08:20:56 2011
New Revision: 169877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169877
Log:
2011-02-07 Kai Tietz
PR lto/47225
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #26 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 19:37:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Kai?
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/tschwinge/tmp/gnu-Elephant_Bird/src/gcc.obj/lto-plugin'
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --tag=disable-stati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #27 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 20:32:24
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:32:17 2011
New Revision: 169900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169900
Log:
2011-02-07 Kai Tietz
PR lto/47225
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #29 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 20:53:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > (In reply to comment #23)
>
> > Could you please test attached patch at
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00469.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 08:03:22
UTC ---
Just out of interest. What binutils version you are using? As error message
indicates that the ld tool doesn't recognize -plugin command.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 09:25:38
UTC ---
Is binutils build using option '--enable-plugins'? It is worth a try. AFAICS is
there in ld's configure.ac a quirk about the header-check windows.h. It uses
here Windows.h, which can lead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 11:14:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I don't known where I report the following issue:
>
> C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c
>
> C:\>a
> Hello, World!
>
> C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c
> c:/gcc-4.6-w
||2011.02.08 15:38:59
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 15:38:59
UTC ---
Hmm, this could be related to wrapper and file-removing there.
Does this patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-09 09:40:28
UTC ---
So it seems to be an issue of lto and file-caching. There is a dangling
file-handle, which can cause this issue.
Could you please test the following patch, if it solves the unlink issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-09 13:10:24
UTC ---
So there seems to be another dangling file-handle on it ... you are sure new
plugin was used by ld? Another thing of interest, is the file it tries to
remove still existing or already remo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-10 08:57:27
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Feb 10 08:57:24 2011
New Revision: 16
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=16
Log:
2011-02-10 Kai Tietz
PR lto/47241
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-11 08:55:14
UTC ---
Yes, I know. The other part is related to binutils itself.
I just want to wait that patch for ld gets approval and a final test can be
done. AFAICS are now all issues in gcc already addre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-14 10:30:15
UTC ---
So, necessary patch is now committed to binutils. Could you please retest this
issue with a recent binutils/HEAD version?
Thanks in advance,
Kai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47753
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-16 21:09:07
UTC ---
I tested it with a 4.5.2 32-bit/64-bit with mingw-w64 runtime, and with current
4.6 trunk version 32-bit/64-bit and I can reproduce this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47753
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-23 12:38:59
UTC ---
Thanks for clarification. Closed as invalid.
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-25 13:15:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> For a detailed description of this bug see:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=1053052&group_id=2435
>
> In short
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28047
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-28 18:23:29
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Feb 28 18:23:25 2011
New Revision: 170570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170570
Log:
2011-02-28 Kai Tietz
PR debug/28047
* dwar
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-28 18:41:37
UTC ---
Fixed on trunk.
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-28 19:12:04
UTC ---
This bug should be already fixed beginning for gcc 4.6 after 12.2.2011. Please
update your sources and retry.
This is a duplicate of PR lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anhvofrcaus at gmail dot
|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2011-03-03 21:46:48
UTC ---
This bug is invalid. The compiler did what you told him here. If you have the
opinion for 'char s[] = "text"' would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47980
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Target: x86_64-*-* i686-*-*
Following sample-code demonstrates that patterns for i386 architecture's md for
bt* optimizations are weak. In patterns is just ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed
||2013-08-06
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz ---
Change to gcc/prefix.c seems to make sense for relocatable-setup. The hack
part seems to be no longer necessary and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46501
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35300
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ---
Hmm, I tried to reproduce this case with testcase:
extern unsigned int __builtin_ia32_crc32si (unsigned int, unsigned int);
#pragma GCC target("sse4.2")
and I don't get this ICE. I might do here something wrong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56892
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2013-09-10
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
Yes, this is a libtool bug. If thing is solved on libtool, then we can
continue on that. So long I set bug in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whitequill at abstractions dot
me
--- Commen
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
Duplicate of PR/57848
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57848 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ---
Hmm, what I don't get is why there is a warning about -mno-fentry. So I would
assume there is something else broken.
Nevertheless this reminds me about pr/57848. This issue seems to be in
general no mingw speci
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
If this issue occurs with more recent gcc-version, please open an new bug. gcc
4.4 is no longer maintained (same as gcc 4.5).
So closing this bug
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ---
Due this issue is in 4.6 tree, which isn't any longer under maintenance by
gcc's team, I close this bug as won't fix.
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
Due issue is solved for gcc 4.7 (and upward), and gcc 4.6 isn't under
maintenance by gcc team any more, I close this bug as won't fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47596
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52217
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55543
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57495
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55491
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
--- Comment #41 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Sep 10 16:19:45 2013
New Revision: 202474
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk.
PR libstdc++/54314
* config/abi/p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55543
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ---
So 4.7.3, 4.8, and 4.9 are ok. That means this bug was fixed by side-effect.
No need to keep it open any longer. So I close it as fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18649
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ---
gcc requires c++ for building and bootstrap. Therefore libstdc++ isn't disable
and has to be built for stage 1 and stage 2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ---
Does the following patch helps to you?
Index: c/c-decl.c
===
--- c/c-decl.c (Revision 202491)
+++ c/c-decl.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3604,7 +3604,7 @@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ---
please note that bugzilla isn't the proper place to get end-user support about
how to use options. To cite your favorite sentence "please read first the
mail-archive". Actually you weren't the first person havi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Jacek Caban from comment #18)
> Created attachment 30806 [details]
> mingw-w64-headers intrins fix
Thanks Jacek for providing this work-a-round here, but I would like to ask
Dongsheng not to hi-jac
||2013-09-12
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz ---
Hmm, I tested with 4.8, and with trunk 4.9. It seems to work for me. Does
this error still happens for you with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Sep 13 17:28:25 2013
New Revision: 202572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202572&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/57848
* c-decl.c (c_builtin_function_ext_scope): Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz 2011-10-19 17:44:39
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Oct 19 17:44:35 2011
New Revision: 180200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180200
Log:
PR middle-end/50795
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2011-11-07 12:00:49
UTC ---
The issue is caused by bitfield layout. For mingw targets the -mms-bitfields
option is for 4.7 active by default.
So the mixture of different sized types in union is leading to this beh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2011-11-07 12:19:09
UTC ---
Suggested patch for this issue
ChangeLog
* quadmath-imp.h (ieee854_float128): Adjust
for ms-bitfield layout.
Index: quadmath-imp.h
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-11-07 22:04:00
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:03:51 2011
New Revision: 181125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181125
Log:
PR target/51007
* quadmath-imp.h (ieee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51007
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215
--- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz 2012-06-27 14:03:13
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jun 27 14:03:08 2012
New Revision: 189016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189016
Log:
PR preprocessor/37215
* c-ppoutput.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215
--- Comment #15 from Kai Tietz 2012-06-27 15:06:21
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jun 27 15:06:16 2012
New Revision: 189019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189019
Log:
Merged from trunk
PR preprocessor/372
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2012-07-06 18:54:24
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Jul 6 18:54:20 2012
New Revision: 189338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189338
Log:
PR bootstrap/52947
* config/i386/mingw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2012-07-06 18:56:15
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Fri Jul 6 18:56:09 2012
New Revision: 189339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189339
Log:
Backport from mainline.
PR bootstrap/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2012-07-16 14:13:02
UTC ---
Offending patch got reverted.
101 - 200 of 846 matches
Mail list logo
