Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kristopher.kuhlman at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I am building petsc, and the hypre library being built as part of that triggers
this ICE when using optimization. When building the same library with -Og there
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93268
--- Comment #1 from Kris ---
sorry. I guess I should add this version of gcc is built from the git version
pulled this morning.
gcc (GCC) 10.0.0 20200114 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93268
--- Comment #2 from Kris ---
It builds with -O2, fails with -O3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93268
--- Comment #4 from Kris ---
Created attachment 47653
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47653&action=edit
preprocessed source file
gzipped preprocessed source file attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720
Summary: problems with makefile dependency generation using -M
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90927
Kris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristopher.kuhlman at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90927
--- Comment #7 from Kris ---
Created attachment 46522
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46522&action=edit
petsc source file that ICE happens on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90927
--- Comment #10 from Kris ---
that fixed the problem for me. thanks!
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kristopher.kuhlman at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Latest version of gfortran gives error and ICE when compiling CGEGV from LAPACK
using the following command line (from petsc build).
home/klkuhlm/src/petsc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
Kris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kristopher.kuhlman at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
--- Comment #10 from Kris ---
Thank you for the effort.
On Thursday, June 2, 2016, pault at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350
>
> Paul Thomas changed:
>
>What
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kristopher.kuhlman at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36368
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36368&action=edit
test program
The attach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48428
Summary: gfortran internal error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #11 from Kris 2011-04-04
13:33:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> *** Bug 48428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I further reduced the code from bug 48248. I don't know if this helps, but if
you change the size of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720
--- Comment #2 from Kris 2011-05-25
19:36:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> May I ask what version of gfortran this is? (Trunk build of gfortran from
> yesterday is a bit ambiguous)
I was using a build of gfortran from CVS 2/12/2011.
> The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720
--- Comment #3 from Kris 2011-05-25
19:45:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I was using a build of gfortran from CVS 2/12/2011.
I meant SVN, not CVS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #15 from Kris 2011-05-27
03:33:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> *) The error is triggered by USEing a module in which a 'bad' procedure is
> defined.
> *) A 'bad' procedure is one having
> b) a dummy argument 'foo' which is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #29 from Kris 2011-06-08
13:12:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> r174416 fixes all the test cases in this PR (except comment #11, which is
> invalid). I'm glad we finally nailed this one.
>
> Closing as fixed. Thanks for reporti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #31 from Kris 2011-06-08
13:49:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > Will this fix be applied to 4.6 or 4.5?
> However, if your life depends on it, we could maybe consider having an
> exception from tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601
--- Comment #35 from Kris 2011-06-20
02:31:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Thanks, Janus -- you rock!
I concur. Thanks!
20 matches
Mail list logo
