-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42713
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42713&action=edit
Autoreduced testcase
Compiling the attached testcase wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83147
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 42714
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42714&action=edit
Experimental patch
This patch appears to fix the problem for me. However, it isn't really tested
yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83147
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
/home/dailybuild/gnu-dailybuild/arena/20160918/gcc-head/src/libgo/runtime/proc.c:
In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77642
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
On s390 32 bit size_t is "unsigned long". __splitstack_find in libgcc is
defined as follows:
extern void*
__splitstack_find (void *, void *, size_t *, void **, void **, v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77642
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 39660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39660&action=edit
Patch proposal
There was another location in proc.c which was in need of a conversion.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39780
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39780&action=edit
auto-reduced testcase
The attached testcase ICEs with a segmentation fault c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Nov 11 08:48:29 2016
New Revision: 242066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR77822: S/390: Add range checks for zero_extract operands.
Make sur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #28 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Nov 11 10:37:53 2016
New Revision: 242067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: Add PR77822 testcase.
For real this time.
2016-11-11 Domini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Nov 18 14:28:49 2016
New Revision: 242589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
RS6000: Fix PR 77359: Properly align local variables in functions cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Nov 18 14:44:54 2016
New Revision: 242590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Re-apply: Drop excess size used for run time allocated stack variable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60501
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Mar 24 17:38:09 2014
New Revision: 208796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-24 Andreas Krebbel
PR rtl-optimization/60501
* optab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60776
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Apr 8 14:18:46 2014
New Revision: 209221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-08 Andreas Krebbel
PR rtl-optimization/60776
* gcc.d
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Regression hunt indicates that r209897 might have caused a bootstrap failure on
s390 ESA mode:
Bootstrap dies reproducable with a segfault in bash:
...
make install-leaf DESTDIR=../.././gcc
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 35002
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35002&action=edit
Experimental and way too expensive fix
the combine pass sometimes gets confused by alrea
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Running the GCC guality testsuite on z currently shows many
fails. These fails need to be investigated, classified, and fixed.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66023
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Enable the AddressSanitizer in GCC for IBM z Systems. The goal is to pass the
AddressSanitizer testsuite on a z machine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66024
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66025
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Enable the ThreadSanitizer in GCC for IBM z Systems. The goal is to pass the
ThreadSanitizer testsuite on a z machine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66024
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Since this requires the base z Systems support on the LLVM side this BZ should
be addressed first: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23433
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66025
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Since this requires the base z Systems support on the LLVM side this BZ should
be addressed first: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23434
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> IMHO the nops should go immediately before the first real instruction in the
> function. The point of not emitting it earlier is so that the nops are
> already
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 35635
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35635&action=edit
Reduced testcase
cc1plus -O1 t.c
...
unsigned int linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset(unsig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #25 from Andreas Krebbel ---
The patch looks good to me. Please post it on the mailing list and I'll commit
it.
Jakub, thanks for your valuable comments! Does Dominik's last patch address
your concerns?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri May 29 14:26:56 2015
New Revision: 223867
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223867&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 66215: S390: Fix placement of post-label NOPs with -mhotpatch
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #31 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Jun 1 11:25:56 2015
New Revision: 223930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 66215: S390: Fix placement of post-label NOPs with -mhotpatch
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #32 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Jun 1 11:28:09 2015
New Revision: 223931
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223931&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 66215: S390: Fix placement of post-label NOPs with -mhotpatch
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #33 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Jun 1 11:29:46 2015
New Revision: 223932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 66215: S390: Fix placement of post-label NOPs with -mhotpatch
gcc
||2014-01-14
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
There is a secondary reload which is supposed to handle that case. I'll try to
figur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59803
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 31832
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31832&action=edit
Experimental fix
This patch fixes the problem. I'll post/commit it when it passed regtesting.
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Bootstrap on s390x started failing with r206941:
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 22 21:27:38 2014
New Revision: 206941
URL: http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59934
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59934
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 31948
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31948&action=edit
Preprocessed file
compile with: -O2 -Warray-bounds
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
The following testcase fails on s390x and Power. Constant folding and runtime
execution of a division of complex numbers produce different results.
The testcase works fine on x86 so it looks like S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60181
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
I'll keep the bugreport open with low prio. If I find the time I will at least
try to understand what's going on before closing it.
The testcase is extracted from gcc/testsuite/go.test/test/ken/cplx2.go wh
: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 32333
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32333&action=edit
Experimental fix
This actually is a follow-on to #57604.
While debugging 435.groma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60501
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60501
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Bootstrap with -mzarch -m31 -march=zEC12 as defaults passed. 108 testsuite
fails got fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60501
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #0)
...
> no lra:
> 4982a6: eb e6 00 01 00 df sllk%r14,%r6,1
...
> lra:
> 49823e: eb 9e 00 01 00 df sllk%r9,%r14,1 <-- cc set
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60501
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Do you have a testcase?
I've tried for a while to reduce one but failed. Only under rare circumstances
GCC seems to be able to reuse the cc from the first comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60501
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #2)
> > Bootstrap with -mzarch -m31 -march=zEC12 as defaults passed. 108 testsuite
> > fails got fixed.
>
> So are you
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36289
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36289&action=edit
Autoreduced testcase
This bug has been reported on the Debian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #25 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 8 07:49:41 2015
New Revision: 228594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: Use create_tmp_var_raw in s390_atomic_assign_expand_fenv.
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Kre
||2015-10-20
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 36549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36549&action=edit
Experimental fix
I'm regression testing the attached patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 22 08:24:01 2015
New Revision: 229163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229163&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR68015 Fix ICE in s390_emit_compare
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-10-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Oct 22 08:28:57 2015
New Revision: 229165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229165&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR68015 Fix ICE in s390_emit_compare
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-10-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Nov 9 15:31:32 2015
New Revision: 230023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR debug/67192] Fix C loops' back-jump location
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Nov 9 15:35:10 2015
New Revision: 230024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR debug/67192] Further fix C loops' back-jump location
gcc/c/Chang
: critical
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 34699
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34699&action=edit
Experimental fix
The following testcase
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
The vector-compare-1.c testcase fails on S/390 when compiled with -march=z196
Steps to reproduce:
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix/-m31/-march=z196'
dg-tor
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
mv-search.c
SetupFastFullPelSearch
for (blky = 0; blky < 4; blky++)
{
LineSadBlk0 = LineSadBlk1 = LineSadB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to jgreenhalgh from comment #1)
> I'm happy to take a look at this, but I have no access to an s390 ESA mode
> environment, so will struggle to make much progress.
>
> If it is the case that s390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
While the patch fixes this particular case the problem appears to be more
fundamental. The S/390 backend only considers GPR register pairs starting with
an even register to be valid (REGNO_PAIR_OK in s390.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 33411
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33411&action=edit
Reduced testcase
compile with -O2 -mesa -m31 -march=g5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to jgreenhalgh from comment #6)
> As mentioned in the original patch submission [1], the effect is to allow
> removal the removal of temporary registers when shuffling arguments for a
> call.
Ok.
||2014-09-02
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Mine. Probably caused by my FPR save slot patchset.
: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 33435
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33435&action=edit
Preprocessed zsh 5.0.6 source file
zsh compilation runs into infinite loop on S/390:
cc1 bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
I agree that this is something we need to fix in the back-end. I was just
curious about when this surfaced first and keep that info for the records.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Sep 3 08:06:09 2014
New Revision: 214850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-03 Andreas Krebbel
PR target/61078
* config/s390/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 33450
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33450&action=edit
Experimental patch
I'm currently bootstrapping this patch with various combinations. It will take
some time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Sep 19 09:14:59 2014
New Revision: 215381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-19 Andreas Krebbel
PR target/62662
* config/s390/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Sep 19 09:20:38 2014
New Revision: 215383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-19 Andreas Krebbel
PR target/62662
* config/s390/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Sep 25 07:37:36 2014
New Revision: 215582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-25 Andreas Arnez
PR 63300/debug
* tree.c (check_ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Dec 2 07:26:30 2015
New Revision: 231146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231146&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR68603] Associate conditional C++ loop's back-jump with start, not b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68695
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #15)
> Providing that macro does fix the problem:
>
> #define PROMOTE_MODE(MODE,UNSIGNEDP,TYPE) \
> if (GET_MODE_CLASS (MODE) == MODE_INT
||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Caused by a small thinko in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231813&root=gcc&view=rev
Should be fixed by now. Bootstrap is still running.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68992
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Fixed with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231876&root=gcc&view=rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69247
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69247
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Jan 13 11:59:29 2016
New Revision: 232318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR69247: Fix bswap hi splitter.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-01-13 An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56194
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Jan 15 12:53:00 2016
New Revision: 232422
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232422&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: const9.C: Disable test.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58035
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In the following example r1 is being used as input to the inline asm although
the register asm definition forces it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 35723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35723&action=edit
Experimental fix
The attached patch fixes the problem for me.
There appear to be two problems:
1. When par
||2015-06-09
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 35730
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35730&
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
0x8059c283 gen_formal_parameter_die
/home/andreas/clean/../gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:18034
0x805a8b5d gen_decl_die
/home/andreas/clean
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66597
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1)
> Is that the actual line number (18034) with current mainline? 18034 does
> not look like a place we could ICE in.
>
> Perhaps it's the ICE in 25535, because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66482
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66597
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66482
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 35830
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35830&action=edit
Automatically reduced testcase from S/390 bootstrap failure
cc1 -fpreprocessed -quiet -g -O0 t.c
t.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66482
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2)
> Proposed patch awaiting review:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00943.html
As expected when removing the failing assertion - this fixes the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66482
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Jun 24 06:50:53 2015
New Revision: 224875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224875&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR66306: Fix match_dups on swapped operands.
2015-06-24 Andreas Kreb
||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Fixed in Glibc per comment #12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #15 from Andreas Kr
401 - 500 of 651 matches
Mail list logo
