Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: kirbyz...@sogou-inc.com
[root@djt-17-109-v06 tmp]# cat tvisi.cpp
extern "C" typedef struct __cook cook_t;
extern "C" cook_
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: kirbyz...@sogou-inc.com
[root@djt-17-109-v06 tmp]# cat tover.cpp
struct __cook {
virtual ~__cook() = default;
};
struct __cook1: public __cook {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53611
--- Comment #1 from Kirby Zhou 2012-06-08 11:16:36
UTC ---
gcc source base:
DATE 20120604
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/redhat/gcc-4_7-branch@188193
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53611
--- Comment #3 from Kirby Zhou 2012-06-09 09:43:09
UTC ---
If "myopen" returns "__cook", I will agree with you. But "myopen" returns
"__cook *", just a pointer.
I do not think it is reasonable to hide "myopen".
It is a usual method to hide the im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53613
--- Comment #3 from Kirby Zhou 2012-06-11 10:15:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixed on trunk by patch for PR 50043
Did this patch apply to 4.7 branch?
I retested with 4.7 branch 20120610, The bug is still exist.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53613
--- Comment #5 from Kirby Zhou 2012-06-12 02:39:44
UTC ---
It is a BAD NEWS about no fix on the 4.7.X branch, and "it's not a regression."
The bug breaks a lot of already exist oode which is workable with GCC-4.4.X
release.
(In reply to commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #13 from Kirby Zhou 2012-06-13 03:48:34
UTC ---
How about back port this patch to 4.7 branch?
It cause a lot of compile error which easily confuse programmers.
(In reply to comment #9)
> Author: paolo
> Date: Mon Apr 2 00:13:30 201
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: kirbyz...@sogou-inc.com
shared_ptr declares its copy constructor and assign operator by template (if
Y == T). But the nontrivial copy constructor is been
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50043
--- Comment #14 from Kirby Zhou 2012-06-15 02:14:48
UTC ---
I have tested to apply this patch to 4.7 branch, everythings goes well.
Since it breaks already existing code, anybody can do commit backport to 4.7
branch?
(In reply to comment #13)
>
