ersion: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: karx11erx at hotmail dot com
GCC build triplet: X86
GCC host triplet: X86
GCC target triplet: X86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36576
--- Comment #2 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-19 15:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is a bug in opensuse's gjar.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***
>
How do I fix it?
--
karx11erx at hotmail dot com changed:
--- Comment #4 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-19 20:01 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Update your system. Report this bug to OpenSUSE.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***
>
My system is up to date. It is automatically updated several
--- Comment #5 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-20 09:58 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Update your system. Report this bug to OpenSUSE.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***
>
I have been searching around a little and found that the
--- Comment #6 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-20 11:00 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Update your system. Report this bug to OpenSUSE.
> >
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35257 ***
> >
>
&g
--- Comment #9 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-20 12:28 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > Because gcc 4.1 throws some errors on our
> > code that works flawlessly with MS compilers and gcc 3, and that absolutely
> > do
> > not seem to be justified, a
--- Comment #10 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-20 12:33 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > > Because gcc 4.1 throws some errors on our
> > > code that works flawlessly with MS compilers and gcc 3, and that
> > > abso
--- Comment #12 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-20 13:03 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> > There is also no ambiguity in this:
>
> Why that is invalid code is shown on http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html .
>
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Which
--- Comment #14 from karx11erx at hotmail dot com 2008-06-21 08:57 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> think of:
>
> template struct CBase
> {
> protected:
>T *i;
> };
> template<> struct CBase
> {
> protected: typedef int i;
> };
>
