FIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jzhang918 at gmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27622
--- Comment #1 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2006-05-16 11:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=11475)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11475&action=view)
The test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27622
--- Comment #3 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2006-05-18 05:02 ---
Andrew,
Did you use voodoo.i as the test case? I can observe this issue using voodoo.i,
but not for very small test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27622
--- Comment #8 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2006-05-18 09:43 ---
With patch foo6.patch, I get:
gcc -c voodoo.i -o aaa/t.o -pipe
Assembler messages:
FATAL: can't create aaa/t.o: No such file or directory
src/vidhrdw/voodoo.c: In function âvoodoo_startâ:
src/vidhrdw/voodoo.
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jzhang918 at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2009-09-15 05:57 ---
The cause is that DW_TAG_variable references gomp_tls_data instead of
___emutls_v.gomp_tls_data.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357
--- Comment #9 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2009-09-15 14:21 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > The cause is that DW_TAG_variable references gomp_tls_data instead of
> > > ___emutls_v.gomp_tls_data.
--- Comment #5 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2010-01-11 09:36 ---
I just submitted a patch several days ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00130.html
I think it might be able to fix this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42662
--- Comment #7 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2010-01-11 10:11 ---
Sorry, I should have checked my patch with the test code you posted before I
added that comment. My patch does not fix this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42662
ersion: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jzhang918 at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-lin
--- Comment #1 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2010-01-16 12:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=19620)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19620&action=view)
The test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42767
--- Comment #2 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2010-01-16 12:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=19621)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19621&action=view)
The patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42767
--- Comment #3 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2010-01-16 12:37 ---
I'm testing the attached patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42767
--- Comment #5 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 10:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=19630)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19630&action=view)
The committed patch
--
jzhang918 at gmail dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #2 from jzhang918 at gmail dot com 2006-11-16 13:44 ---
I narrowed the cause to this change
2006-06-04 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/27819
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Process initializers for static data
members with non-dep
15 matches
Mail list logo
