[Bug fortran/100971] ICE: Bad IO basetype (7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100971 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/103054] [f18] Gfortran accepts invalid and rejects valid co_reduce argument keyword name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103054 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/107874] merge not using all its arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107874 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- I am seeing timeout failures with merge_1.f90. Can you look into this? Thanks, Jerry On Thu, Dec 1, 2022, 12:28 PM anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs < gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.

[Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read integer with decimal='point'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read integer with decimal='point'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- I should add, I am not saying this is right or wrong. The error message refers to F2003. $ gfortran -std=f2003 pr105473.f90 [jerry@amdr pr105473]$ ./a.out testinput = ";" n= 999 ios=

[Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read integer with decimal='point'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Hi all, I will be looking closer on this one. As I said have to look at the checking code. As soon as I noticed -std=f2003 allowing this it makes no sense at all. I can understand possibly the extension t

[Bug libfortran/105361] Incorrect end-of-file condition for derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/102619] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype, at fortran/trans-array.c:215 since r9-6493-g0e3088806577e805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle2 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/115689] New: Missed deallocation before exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115689 Bug ID: 115689 Summary: Missed deallocation before exit Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/115689] Missed deallocation before exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115689 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- Well I do not know about how all the hooks work but this is with the following configure: ../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/jerry/dev/usr --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-libgomp --disable-bootstra

[Bug fortran/115689] Missed deallocation before exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115689 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargls from comment #3) > The code you posted is standard conforming, and when > compiled, executes as expected. > > My point is that the program is exiting.  The operate system will > reap the

[Bug fortran/115689] Missed deallocation before exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115689 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/105361] Incorrect end-of-file condition for derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 58715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58715&action=edit Proposed patch, still testing The attached patch fixes this bug and passes regression testing. I want to try a

[Bug libfortran/105361] Incorrect end-of-file condition for derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105361 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- I am not allowed to close this PR. (???) It is Resolved/Fixed.

[Bug fortran/119054] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE on passing optional array to elemental procedure with -pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119054 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- I will do the commit. On Fri, Mar 7, 2025, 12:57 PM anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs < gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119054 > > --- Comment #2 from anlau