http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
This seems a little counter-intuitive to me. However with delimiter="NONE" I
think the standard says that junk should be:
&MYLIST
MYSTRING=tue
/
With two spaces after the 'tue'
Agree?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Like this:
&MYLIST
MYSTRING= 'tue '
/
&MYLIST
MYSTRING= "tue "
/
&MYLIST
MYSTRING= tue
/
&MYLIST
MYSTRING= tue
/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The regressions are two fold:
1) Tests are specifically looking for a " or a ' when no longer generated,
and
2) We need to also revise namelist reading of character types which are no
longer delimited
name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:48:48 2014
New Revision: 207801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:48:48 2014
New Revision: 207801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:48:48 2014
New Revision: 207801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:57:35 2014
New Revision: 207802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:57:35 2014
New Revision: 207802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 15:57:35 2014
New Revision: 207802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:53:07 2014
New Revision: 207803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:53:07 2014
New Revision: 207803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:53:07 2014
New Revision: 207803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:55:19 2014
New Revision: 207804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:55:19 2014
New Revision: 207804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backpor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 15 16:55:19 2014
New Revision: 207804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-15 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59836
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59771
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59774
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59764
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. Do I need to backport this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59764
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 22 02:11:44 2014
New Revision: 208038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 22 02:11:44 2014
New Revision: 208038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208038&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Jerry DeLisle
Dominique d'Humieres
Stev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #25 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 22 02:50:39 2014
New Revision: 208039
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208039&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-21 Steven G. Kargl
Backport from mainline
PR fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Running into some snags here:
gfc -fdump-tree-original pr60148.f90
pr60148.f90: In function ‘namelistout’:
pr60148.f90:38:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
end program
I will be fixing this wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 32217
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32217&action=edit
Substantial patch
This patch is larger then it looks due to my editor judiciously removing
trailing space in wri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have reviewed and tested the patch from comment #7 on x86-64 with -m32 and
-m64 and I think its ready. Dominique mentioned to possibly add a volatile. I
have not tested on the other platforms.
I can commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Mar 4 04:33:40 2014
New Revision: 208302
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60148
* io/inquire.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Mar 4 05:46:06 2014
New Revision: 208303
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-03 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60148
* gfortran.dg/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 8 06:04:34 2014
New Revision: 208423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208423&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-08 Dominique d'Humieres
PR libgfortran/60128
* io/w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Patch submitted for the case in Comment #22.
$ gfc48 22.f gfortran version 4.8
$ time ./a.out
real0m26.320s
user0m26.184s
sys0m0.018s
$ gfc 22.f gfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Only documentation remains for this patch. Need to document gfortran extended
behavior for default behavior when writing to name lists whne no DELIM= has
been specified. gfortran defaults to DELIM="quotes"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45143
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The read:
read(buffer,'(i10)') i
is an entirely different code path then the example in Comment #22 because of
the format specifier. This is handled very differently from a list directed
read. In read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #31 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 9 03:17:16 2014
New Revision: 208438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/38199
* io/list_read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 32312
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32312&action=edit
New patch for case in comment 21
This is just a preliminary runtime patch.
Without:
real0m7.519s
user0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #33 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 9 05:34:34 2014
New Revision: 208439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-08 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/38199
* io/list_read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #34 from Jerry DeLisle ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-03/msg00079.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #37 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Here on NIST I do not get any failures. FM908 passes FM905 and FM907 require
inspection to confirm and they look good. I only need to adjust the reference
output file that is used by the script to do the in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #39 from Jerry DeLisle ---
OK, I can reproduce this here. The problem is the read is trying to go past
where we adjusted the string length due to things like 1X and / in the format.
Good catch, thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #40 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 32335
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32335&action=edit
Updated patch taking care of NIST failures and cleaned up
This patch regression tests and passes NIST on x86-64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #42 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Mar 13 05:06:57 2014
New Revision: 208528
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-12 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/38199
* io/read.c (r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The patch committed as shown in comment #42 of pr38199 appears to fix this one
incidentally. Regarding comment 5, I am still not sure the code is valid, but I
do agree there is no reason to give an error eithe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 32346
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32346&action=edit
A proposed patch
The attached patch regression tests OK on x86-64-linux-gnu. Fixes the original
test case and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8)
> The patch committed as shown in comment #42 of pr38199 appears to fix this
> one incidentally. Regarding comment 5, I am still not sure the code is
> valid, but I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 15:12:01 2014
New Revision: 208591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/58324
* io/list_read.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 15:15:22 2014
New Revision: 208592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/58324
* gfortran.dg/l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 20:31:33 2014
New Revision: 208595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208595&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #43 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 20:31:33 2014
New Revision: 208595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208595&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 20:34:58 2014
New Revision: 208596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #44 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 23:06:44 2014
New Revision: 208599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 23:06:44 2014
New Revision: 208599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 16 00:18:21 2014
New Revision: 208603
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Dominique d'Humieres
Backport from mainline
PR l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 16 00:35:19 2014
New Revision: 208604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-15 Dominique d'Humieres
Backport from mainline
PR l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|---
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Not fixed. With the original test case. If one gives one or more empty
keyboard enters in response to the read from stdin, it then takes two Ctrl-D to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44489
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Mar 18 01:20:02 2014
New Revision: 208629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-17 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/58324
* io/list_read
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Wrong PR number in ChangeLog.
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Mar 18 01:20:02 2014
New Revision: 208629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-17 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58324
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Disregard comment 11. Wrong PR number in change log.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60128
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle ---
We can xfail the test case if we are certain of the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #29 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I happened to just get Cygwin installed and running on my Windows box. Let me
run some tests and see if I can understand this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Nov 7 18:13:17 2015
New Revision: 229935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-07 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 36805
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36805&action=edit
Expanded test case
Attached is an expanded test case. Could someone review and confirm this is
valid. I need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have done some experimenting. Since gcc supports OMP and I think to some
extent ACC why not come up with a MATMUL that exploits these if present? On
the darwin platform discussed in comment #12, the perf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
If I can get something working I am thinking something like -fexternal-blas-n,
if -n not given then default to current libblas behaviour. This way users have
some control. With GPUs, it is not unusual to hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Nov 23 00:40:51 2015
New Revision: 230734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/52251
* io/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21)
> > Hidden behind a -fexternal-blas-n switch might be an option. Including GPUs
> > seems even a tad more tricky. We have a paper on GPU (small) matrix
> > multip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #16)
> For what its worth:
>
> $ gfc pr51119.f90 -lblas -fno-external-blas -Ofast -march=native
> $ ./a.out
> Time, MATMUL:21.2483196 21.25444964601
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. Should we backport to 5 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #25)
>
> But, that is not particularly impressive, is it? I don't know about current
> low end graphics adapters, but at least the high end GPU cards (Tesla) are
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #29)
> These slides show how to reach 90% of peak:
> http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/
> the code actually is not too ugly, and I think there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 03:51:16 2015
New Revision: 219630
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219630&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/61933
* io.c (gfc_matc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 03:57:29 2015
New Revision: 219631
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219631&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/61933
* io/inquire
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jan 15 04:06:02 2015
New Revision: 219632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR target/61933
* gfortran.dg/inq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #26 from Jerry D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
You might notice that we redefined existence to be whether or not it is
connected. Units get connected when opened so your sample code needs only ask:
IF ((.NOT.is_open).AND.(istat == 0)) RETURN
Whether th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #11)
See patch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg01616.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 23 01:59:23 2015
New Revision: 220023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/61933
* libgfortran.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 23 02:06:17 2015
New Revision: 220025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/61933
* gfortran.dg/n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. I am going to add a test case in the testsuite for the example
in Comment #7 before I close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 23 02:01:10 2015
New Revision: 220024
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220024&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/61933
* io/inquir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
--- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jan 23 03:37:30 2015
New Revision: 220026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220026&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/61933
* gfortran.dg/m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64849
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64849
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Valgrind shows 5 instances of:
==20889== Invalid read of size 8
==20889==at 0x401241: __final_main_T2.3409 (in
/home/jerry/prs/pr64506/a.out)
==20889==by 0x400D51: __final_main_T3.3400 (in
/home/jerry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45608
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41711
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41711
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
1201 - 1300 of 2296 matches
Mail list logo
