[Bug fortran/91726] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91726 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Hi Paul! This seems to fix the ICE generated by using -ftrapv -fcheck=bounds Fixes "nelems" type and adds an optional assert to make sure it stays fixed. Best regards, José Rui diff --git a/

[Bug fortran/100018] New: ICE on missing polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100018 Bug ID: 100018 Summary: ICE on missing polymorphic argument Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100018] ICE on missing polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100018 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Path posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055916.html

[Bug fortran/100024] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100024 Bug ID: 100024 Summary: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: for

[Bug fortran/100025] New: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 Bug ID: 100025 Summary: ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: for

[Bug fortran/100027] New: ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027 Bug ID: 100027 Summary: ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug fortran/100024] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100024 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html

[Bug fortran/100025] ICE on subroutine missing explicit interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100025 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055921.html

[Bug fortran/100027] ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055922.html

[Bug fortran/84006] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com -

[Bug fortran/100029] New: ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 Bug ID: 100029 Summary: ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/100040] New: Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 Bug ID: 100040 Summary: Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/100094] New: Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 Bug ID: 100094 Summary: Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100097] New: Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097 Bug ID: 100097 Summary: Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100098] New: Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100098 Bug ID: 100098 Summary: Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/100103] New: Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100103 Bug ID: 100103 Summary: Automatic reallocation fails inside select rank Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100118] New: ICE on sizeof with derived type components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100118 Bug ID: 100118 Summary: ICE on sizeof with derived type components Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug fortran/100120] New: associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 Bug ID: 100120 Summary: associated intrinsic failure Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran A

[Bug fortran/100029] ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100029 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html

[Bug fortran/100040] Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100040 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html

[Bug fortran/100094] Undefined pointers have incorrect rank when using optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100094 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- (In reply to kargl from comment #1) > Isn't the code invalid Fortran because it references an undefined pointer? > If yes, the compiler is allows to do whatever it wants with the code. AFAIK th

[Bug fortran/100097] Unlimited polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100097 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html

[Bug fortran/100098] Polymorphic pointers and allocatables have incorrect rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100098 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055933.html

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055942.html

[Bug fortran/100132] New: Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 Bug ID: 100132 Summary: Optimization breaks pointer association Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100132] Optimization breaks pointer association

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100132 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055946.html

[Bug fortran/100136] New: ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136 Bug ID: 100136 Summary: ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug fortran/100136] [11/12 Regression] ICE, regression, using flag -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Only handles the ICE... Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055949.html

[Bug fortran/82376] Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055973.html

[Bug fortran/100245] New: ICE on automatic reallocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 Bug ID: 100245 Summary: ICE on automatic reallocation Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100245 --- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055982.html

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Patch (version 2) posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055991.html

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > Patch (version 2) posted: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055991.html > > Please assign the PR to yourself when y

[Bug fortran/92621] Problems with memory handling with allocatable intent(out) arrays with bind(c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621 --- Comment #12 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11) > Did you try to click on 'take' in > > Assignee: > Not yet assigned to anyone (edit) (take) > I do not have the "edit" or "take" link