http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #5 from gee 2011-12-18 22:02:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hmm, this might be another instance for already solved PR/50053. Could you
> recheck, if error is still present for current 4.7 trunk version.
>
> Thanks
Target is i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|temporary hack to make |make dejagnu work in
|dejagnu wor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #6 from gee 2012-01-16 13:17:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 26338
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26338
proposed patch for handling thiscall
adopted from
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552533
without a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-18 06:14:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm, this might be a duplicate for already fixed PR/50053. Could you please
> check, if you still have this issue here with current trunk version.
>
> Thanks
Startin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression]
|natObject.cc:58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057
--- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-18 13:28:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 26365
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365
proposed patch
it fixes invalid padding that caused the bug.
#include
#define DEBUG 1
#include
#include
#in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #7 from gee 2012-01-18 13:35:15 UTC ---
after applying pr50057 patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes2324
# of unexpected failures51
#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901
Bug #: 51901
Summary: [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty
throws ExceptionInInitializerError
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901
--- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-19 12:36:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Why the 4.7 regression tag? Does it work in 4.6? I think the amount of
> libgcj
> changes since 4.6 has been very small...
sorry for 4.7 regression tag. it worked be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26338|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051
Bug #: 52051
Summary: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O
flag
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051
--- Comment #1 from gee 2012-01-30 04:17:43 UTC ---
in dump.zip,
filename with prefix 0 : without -O flag
with prefix 1 : with -O flag.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901
--- Comment #3 from gee 2012-01-30 07:14:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 26512
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512
proposed patch for handling thiscall r3
FAIL: TestClosureGC output
FAIL: libjava.jar/TestClosureGC.jar executio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901
--- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-30 07:15:28 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 26512
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512
proposed patch for handling thiscall r3
invalid attachment. please ignore it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26499|0 |1
is obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500
--- Comment #11 from gee 2012-01-30 15:10:48 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 26513
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26513
proposed patch for handling thiscall r3
@@ -505,6 +508,23 @@ ffi_prep_incoming_args_SYSV(char *stack, void
ponent: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31793
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-05-02 19:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=13499)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13499&action=view)
demux_vqf.i
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31793
--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-05-03 05:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
confirmed. it works now. thanks
> Created an attachment (id=13499)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13499&action=view) [edit]
> demux_vqf.i
>
(In reply to
ot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-05-14 22:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13555)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13555&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32400
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-19 12:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=13735)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13735&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32400
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-19 18:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=13737)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13737&action=view)
source file that causes ICE
reduced. just three line for ICE
--
jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-19 18:18 ---
(From update of attachment 13737)
removing static keyword at the top resolves problem.
but is it workaround?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32400
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32413
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-20 08:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=13740)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13740&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32413
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32461
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-22 16:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=13762)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13762&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32461
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-22 16:06 ---
fails if given -Olevel level>2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32461
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32504
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-25 20:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=13786)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13786&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32504
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-25 20:44 ---
craches if -Olevel given level>1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32504
--- Comment #4 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-06-30 15:13 ---
confirmed. it seems fixed.
maybe i need to clean object files instead getting ICE.
--
jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-07-01 23:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=13820)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13820&action=view)
preprocessed file #1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-07-01 23:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=13821)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13821&action=view)
preprocessed file #2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-07-03 12:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=13833)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13833&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2007-07-03 12:02 ---
svn revision 126249
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Bug #: 55317
Summary: [i386-regression] just don't strip stdcall suffix in
gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
rflow -falign-loops -o
TimgFilterAvisynth.s
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 20100227 (experimental) (i686-pc-mingw32)
compiled by GNU C version 4.5.0 20100221 (experimental), GMP version
5.0.0, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
GNU
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 08:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=19973)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19973&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43196
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 08:44 ---
when given without -mstackrealign, it works fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43196
--- Comment #5 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-03-25 02:07 ---
well, this bug seems not active for now. works in current gcc
--
jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jojelino at gmail dot com
Host: i686-pc-cygwin
Target: i686-pc-cygwin
Build: i686-pc-cygwin
Created attachment 33783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33783&action=edit
prep
cygwin flag for gcc with host i686-pc-cygwin,
stdcxx wrappers for cygwin must be disabled because of libcygwin.a is not
linked with it.
but, when building gcc for target i686-pc-cygwin ,
USE_CYGWIN_LIBSTDCXX_WRAPPERS and -mno-use-libstdc-wrappers seems to be
enabled.
then, CXX_WRAP_SPEC_LIST will be enabled although it must be disabled when
added flag -mno-cygwin. causing undefined symbol problem which i had.
but when linking with i686-pc-mingw32-g++, it has no undefined symbol problem.
because there is no --wrap argument.
please consider to fix this problem
--
Summary: undesired operation when working with mno-cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42609
_Linker::verify_class
../.././libjava/link.cc:1904
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-08 17:50 ---
here is vtable dump for klass
as you can see , klass->engine of dynamic version is NULL
whereas static version got proper instance though
so klass->engine->verify(klass); invokes SEGV...
but why does it
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 06:11 ---
maybe this could be linker problem. jcr section doesn't seem preserved in
shared library.
00ffd668 d ___JCR_LIST__
010021c4 d ___JCR_END__
004097b4 d ___JCR_LIST__
004097c0 d ___JCR_END__
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #4 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 07:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=19517)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19517&action=view)
diff file i used
here is configuration
./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-win32-registry --enable-thread
--- Comment #5 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 07:44 ---
(From update of attachment 19517)
here is configuration
./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-win32-registry --enable-threads=posix
--enable-languages=c,c++,java --with-win32-nlsapi=unicode --enable-tls
--disable-bootstrap
--- Comment #7 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 08:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=19520)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19520&action=view)
gzipped text
oh my. it counts more than 65535.. [167929]
and gzipped file exceed limit 1000k so i can'
--- Comment #9 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:24 ---
(From update of attachment 19520)
oh my i ran objdump -t instead of objdump -p
i'm sorry for this.
--
jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #10 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=19521)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19521&action=view)
undefined symbol list
this is undefined symbol list when i link without --export-all-symbols
when linking
--- Comment #12 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:56 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Ah. It's probably caused by --enable-java-awt. AWT isn't yet supported on
> cygwin yet; looks like it will need some adjustment to the way .o files are
> divided between
--- Comment #13 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 10:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=19522)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19522&action=view)
hdrs (with --export-all-symbols) which i should have attached
it counts 57439 whoa,
what happens if total
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 05:02 ---
linking executables with -Wl,--whole-archive libgcj-noncore.la libgcj.la
-Wl,--no-whole-archive solves this problem. excepts that it creates fatty
import symbol table approx. (28 megabyte). is there any workaround
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-21 04:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=19671)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19671&action=view)
patch
now it summons gcj-noncore dll and resolves classes which should have been
resolved. i know it's
on] ICE in verify_flow_info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build tripl
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-25 00:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=19698)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19698&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-25 00:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=19699)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19699&action=view)
testcase
other testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859
assigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42870
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-26 10:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=19709)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19709&action=view)
given __attribute__ ((dllexport))
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42870
--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-26 22:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=19719)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19719&action=view)
given __attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))
and test result
(given __attribute__ ((dllexport))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48619
Summary: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error: in
lower_emutls_function_body
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
--- Comment #6 from gee 2011-04-15 15:40:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 23996 [details]
> Proposed fix
>
> I don't have (easy) access to a platform exhibiting this bug but this
> patch should rather obviously fix it. It
--- Comment #17 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-14 10:07 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created an attachment (id=21196)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21196&action=view) [edit]
> patch
>
> Can you test this patch?
>
yes. attache
27
this is equivalant from code. OK.
but after applying chrec, i got
:
if (dwReason_20(D) != 2)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
# pfunc_26 = PHI <&MEM[(void *)&__xd_a + 4B](14)>
# DEBUG pfunc => pfunc_26
goto ;
:
# pfunc_62 = PHI
D.36698_25 = *pfunc_62;
if (D.36698_25 != 0B)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
pfunc_27 = pfunc_62 + 4;
# DEBUG pfunc => pfunc_27
# DEBUG pfunc => pfunc_27
if (pfunc_27 != &__xd_z)
goto ;
else
goto ;
we all know there is something wrong. it resulted segmetation fault because
pretest statement moved latter block so there is no way to prevent it...
it introduced from -O1. is it a bug or a intended one??
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] tree-chrec introduces broken asm code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44997
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-20 07:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=21252)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21252&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44997
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-20 07:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=21253)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21253&action=view)
tree dump with -O1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44997
--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-20 07:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=21254)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21254&action=view)
tree dump with -O1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44997
--- Comment #5 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-20 11:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=21260)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21260&action=view)
generated asm with -O0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44997
--- Comment #6 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-20 11:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=21261)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21261&action=view)
generated asm with -O2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44997
--- Comment #7 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-07-20 11:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=21262)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21262&action=view)
reduced testcase
(In reply to comment #4)
> I don't see anything wrong. Can you reduce your testca
i686-pc-mingw32-gcc returned 1 exit status
collect2: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit status
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts
failed with -fwhopr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45255
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-08-11 09:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=21451)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21451&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45255
--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-08-11 09:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=21451)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21451&action=view) [edit]
> testcase
>
and it is resolved by changing __attribute__
ng: get_format declared static but
never defined [-Wunused-function]
libmpcodecs/vd_ffmpeg.c: In function draw_slice:
libmpcodecs/vd_ffmpeg.c:489:13: error: type mismatch in binary expression
vector(4) uint8_t *
vector(4) uint8_t *
vector(4) unsigned int
vect_var_.106_83 = vect_var_.103_80 - vect_var_.104_81;
libmpcodecs/vd_ffmpeg.c:489:13: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45633
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-09-10 11:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=21764)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21764&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45633
--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-09-10 12:13 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are you really using the fortran-dev branch?
>
$ git branch
* trunk
it is trunk.
i don't recognize how fortran-dev version have been selected. maybe i've
mistaken.
--
ht
--- Comment #4 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-09-11 20:59 ---
this causes ICE
confirmed with gcc -O3 -msse2 -std=gnu99
reduced testcase
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef struct foo2
{
int offset[4];
uint8_t* ref[4];
} foo2;
int
foo(const foo2 *fooval)
{
uint8_t
ssa-ccp.c:1347
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 07:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=21827)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21827&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45716
--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 04:52 ---
seems fixed in rev 164528
--
jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: treelang
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin
GCC host triplet: i686-p
--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 14:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=21868)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21868&action=view)
preprocessed source with gcc -E
preprocessed source can't be made because it died before creating tem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45761
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
Summary: [4.6 regression] cc1 fails to generate target code
with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
--- Comment #1 from gee 2010-10-07 15:26:37 UTC ---
giving -O1 had no problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
--- Comment #3 from gee 2010-10-08 14:12:53 UTC ---
gcc without -mno-cygwin also fails to generate target code.. version of
binutils is 2.20.51.20101005
$ gcc -DHAVE_HYPOT -DHAVE_FILE64 -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN
-DHAVE_SETLOCALE -Wall -Ws
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 regression] cc1 fails |[4.6 regression] cc1 enters
|to g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
--- Comment #5 from gee 2010-10-16 19:28:07 UTC ---
#74655 0x00a146c0 in if_then_else_cond (x=0x7f2e6940, ptrue=0x4e7c64c,
pfalse=0x4e7c644) at ../.././gcc/combine.c:8490
#74656 0x00a146c0 in if_then_else_cond (x=0x7f2e6970, ptrue=0x4e7c6bc,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45936
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46709
Summary: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46709
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 regression] internal |[4.6 regression] internal
|compil
101 - 200 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
