Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: joey.dumont at gmail dot com
CC: joey.dumont at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #2 from Joey Dumont ---
How do I pass -save-temps to make? Is there a environment variable that changes
the gcc command options?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #4 from Joey Dumont ---
Created attachment 46831
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46831&action=edit
Preprocessed parallel_settings.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #6 from Joey Dumont ---
Sorry for the delay, had trouble setting up the test toolchain.
>From what I can see, this does not solve the issue. In fact, the generated
paralle_settings.ii is identical to the one generated before.
To te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #8 from Joey Dumont ---
I realized I made a silly mistake after I posted this. I was meant to try this
version for the target compiler, not the host compiler.
I successfully built the target compiler (mips64-elf) with r273174.
I ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
Joey Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9.1.0 |9.2.0
--- Comment #7 from Joey Dumont ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91474
--- Comment #11 from Joey Dumont ---
I can confirm that this revision fixes the issue. I'll try to lookout for the
gcc-9 version where this will be released. Thank you!
Component: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: joey.dumont at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50757
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50757&action=edit
Patch to fix -Werror=format-security errors
As menti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100431
--- Comment #1 from Joey Dumont ---
Created attachment 50758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50758&action=edit
Workaround for -Wno-format flag injected during build process.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100431
--- Comment #3 from Joey Dumont ---
I had tested with a simple printf:
#include
#ifndef N_
# define N_(msgid) msgid
#endif
int
main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
printf(N_("use of C++23 % integer constant"));
printf(N_("use of C++23 %%> int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100431
--- Comment #5 from Joey Dumont ---
I just started looking at these other cases (for some reason I didn't see them
in my initial compilation), but I am not sure what format specifiers should be
used. Are the format specifiers used by __gcc_tdiag
11 matches
Mail list logo
